"Women Were First!"

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

Know what really drives me crazy?

When women try to “show off.”  I know, they do this non-stop, but in this case I’m talking about how they’re trying to take credit for being the first “author” and the “creator of superheroes.”

Women are taking off with this.  They’re now saying things like:

“Actually, the first person to ever have their name associated with an original written work was Enheduanna, a Sumerian princess and priestess born in 2285 BC.”

My thought is, so fragging what?  While men were raised to go to war and, like today, take up life-risking work, the women were allowed to write?  It’s taking a lot in me not to add:

“What’s the point of this post?  To prove that there was maybe ONE time in history that women were useful before they became the lazy, self-entitled land whales they are today?”

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

The jealousy they have is pretty astounding.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[MaillesmithParticipant 64]

Currently, the statement that the “first person to have their name attached to an original piece of writing” being a woman is true.

 

However, this statement is misleading. It does not say that the first writing was done by a woman, but that the oldest piece of writing that can be traced to a specific author was signed by a woman. There is older evidence of writing, but the authors are forever unknown as they did not have the presence of mind (or the narcissism) to sign their name to their work.

Like many statements of facts, or compilation of evidence, the meaning of what was discovered is skewed to fit the agenda of the voice that speaks it.

I think it bears mentioning, this first evidence of a person signing their name to an original piece of writing was a princess. That writing was taught to her by Royal scholars, and she would have been able to improve her writing skills while not fettered with the need to provide for herself.

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

Maillesmith wrote:

There is older evidence of writing, but the authors are forever unknown as they did not have the presence of mind (or the narcissism) to sign their name to their work.

That’s kind of what I was thinking.  I mean, what about the men of the Bible when they wrote their books (in their original language, before the more recent translations).  What about Gilgamesh, who preceded Enheduanna by a few hundred years at least?

[sidecarParticipant 35851]

Maillesmith wrote:

It does not say that the first writing was done by a woman, but that the oldest piece of writing that can be traced to a specific author was signed by a woman. There is older evidence of writing, but the authors are forever unknown as they did not have the presence of mind (or the narcissism) to sign their name to their work.

Also people remembered the woman’s name for the sheer novelty of it.

I think it bears mentioning, this first evidence of a person signing their name to an original piece of writing was a princess. That writing was taught to her by Royal scholars, and she would have been able to improve her writing skills while not fettered with the need to provide for herself.

It’s also highly likely she merely commissioned the piece and didn’t actually write it herself. Because that’s what royalty does.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Did girls invent Gilgamesh? Did girls invent Orion? Did girls invent Perseus? How about Hercules; did girls invent him?

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Just a ManParticipant 934]

Tell them….of course a female had time to invent a superhero to fantasize about over 4 millennia ago.

Men were out working….and DYING

Men were out soldiering….and DYING

Men were out doing all the things the female could not and would not do….and DYING.

Thank you for your “support”.

 

BTW….how’s that superhero working out for ya?

Philosophy, the female repellent

[BurgundyParticipant 1525]

So, narcissism of women is both ancient and timeless.

 

Somehow, I’m even inclined to believe that one woman may have taken credit from someone else, as that’s what seems to f~~~ing common in the work place today, any way.

 

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

a vigilante with a costume and a secret identity is not a superhero.  A superhero has super powers.  The Punisher, for example, is not a superhero.  Batman, I would also argue, is not a superhero.  Superman is.  I would even go so far as to say a vigilante is not necessarily even a hero.  I would have to know more about the character.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[UntamedParticipant]

They try to take credit for everything. They even say that God is female. Mother Nature, Age of Aquarius, Gaea’s spirit, Inner Female-child side of man ( that one had me rolling), Matriarchal Alien Civilization, Male-Eating spiders, Vampire Killers…

All we men are good for is blow s~~~ up and get blown up.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Mana KnightParticipant 333]

Oh God.
The God one does get to me. Now, whether you believe or not (I do as it happens) The Bible and Jesus are very clear of “The Heavenly FATHER”.

Women cannot be fathers, though I am sure there are lesbian couples who will argue the toss about that they can.

[Mana KnightParticipant 333]

Another one to add to the “firsts”.

Human.

There was a female scientist a while back who said that All men are born women, but then change in the womb (technically true, but born is a strong word to use in this instance).

So therefore WOMEN FIRST!!!!

But if you want to accept this, they must also acknowledge that a foetus of mere days is actually a life: therefore abortion is murdering it. Murdering your own sisterhood even.

You can’t have it both ways.

And how many abortions were there in America again last year? Not sure, but 2011 had 1.6 million.
I expect it can not have been more than few thousand off that give or take.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

The concept of heroes and hero worship came from the Egyptians, Babylonians and Greeks.

All three civilizations were ruled by men.

Women were first, my ass!

 

 

[slardy mcbardfastParticipant 118]

Interesting that she chose to vest hero status in a man. Perhaps were she alive today, the baroness would reject feminism outright.

[DurdenParticipant 1051]

How does this add to their accomplishments. That’s like saying because I am American I was first on the moon. I was not even f~~~ing alive when the moon landing happened. Yet some people take pride in that. They take pride in accomplishments they had no involvement in.

We won our independence from the British. Really because I don’t remember being there and neither were you.

 

 

It's only after we've lost everything that we're free to do anything

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

F~~~ Bob Chipman. He’s just a fat loser piece of f~~~s~~~ who willingly and publicly supports Anita Sarkeesian.

Second of all, Percy Blakeney (main character of The Scarlet Pimpernel) didn’t have superpowers. He only kept his identity secret, much like Zorro or Batman. He was a “hero”, not a “superhero”. Chipman needs to check himself before saying this s~~~.

The first reported “superhero” was Mandrake the Magician, made by Lee Falk, a MAN.

And Enheduanna existed in an era where women were more…..reasonable? And gentle? Not as s~~~ty as they are now? Correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s what I see. This doesn’t mean that there weren’t more poets and writers before her that were men. She’s the first KNOWN person.

[Author]

Posts