Women texting

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Out of boredom I persue on line dating. I admit I will occasionally use an “U” instead of “you” etc. But it seems recently that every woman is using this text code and I’m not sure If I’m texting a 40 year old woman or a 14 year old girl.

I have to read the texts multiple times to figure them out. Is this on purpose? Are they trying to play some game? Are they just lazy?

Does thus happen to anyone else?

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

I rarely text. It is a terrible form of communication. So much misunderstanding can occur. texting eliminates all non verbal communication cues. Therefore, there is no sarcasm, jokes aren’t funny, I hate it. Acrynoms are annoying too, i sometimes have to google them.

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[Tiga KParticipant 1693]

This is only partly related but I hate some of those abbreviations. IMO is the one that annoys me the most. “Blue is a pretty color IMO.” Of course it is your opinion. Why do you feel the need to remind me that it is your opinion? Was everything you said previously an undeniable fact? Why do you only include that when you text? Does that mean you only share your opinion when you text? I drives me crazy! “You’re just being picky IMO.”

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Only snapchat and instagram are more retarded than texting, but not by far IMO ))

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[RennieParticipant]

I remember when I was younger chatting to girls from my school on MSN, they would express contempt for my use of “big words” instead of their primitive acronyms.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Rennie wrote:

they would express contempt for my use of “big words” instead of their primitive acronyms.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[EekParticipant 1162]

I came of age, like many here, as the internet was blossoming. I know what all of their shorthand and abbreviation stands for, I just choose to acknowledge that I put a lot of time and effort into my education. Why should that effort go to waste?

I don’t make a living as a writer of prose, but almost all my work has to do with communication of some kind. Either giving instructions to computers in the form of code, or talking with coworkers and customers about requirements and documentation.

Being able to clearly and effectively communicate on many levels should be the most important thing taught in school, yet these days you are lucky if you get some random string of nonsense emoji out of some people.

Idiocracy is coming true… now I am going to get a drink of water, like from a toilet.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Eek wrote:

I came of age, like many here, as the internet was blossoming. I know what all of their shorthand and abbreviation stands for, I just choose to acknowledge that I put a lot of time and effort into my education. Why should that effort go to waste?

I don’t make a living as a writer of prose, but almost all my work has to do with communication of some kind. Either giving instructions to computers in the form of code, or talking with coworkers and customers about requirements and documentation.

Being able to clearly and effectively communicate on many levels should be the most important thing taught in school, yet these days you are lucky if you get some random string of nonsense emoji out of some people.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Tiga KParticipant 1693]

Eek wrote:

I came of age, like many here, as the internet was blossoming. I know what all of their shorthand and abbreviation stands for, I just choose to acknowledge that I put a lot of time and effort into my education. Why should that effort go to waste?

I don’t make a living as a writer of prose, but almost all my work has to do with communication of some kind. Either giving instructions to computers in the form of code, or talking with coworkers and customers about requirements and documentation.

Being able to clearly and effectively communicate on many levels should be the most important thing taught in school, yet these days you are lucky if you get some random string of nonsense emoji out of some people.

Idiocracy is coming true… now I am going to get a drink of water, like from a toilet.

Its my understanding rhetoric was taught as education first developed in the mideval ages. Oh how society has progressed. That single course of public speaking in college totally has prepared me to effectively articulate my thoughts into language….. NOT!

[Anonymous 18]

Online dating is breeding grounds for insecurity in men. I would advise against it. Boredom or not women feed off attention like parasites on online dating sites. I have had quite a bit of luck getting laid but I never met a normal, sane, baggage-less woman on there. If there is one she is expecting for Prince Charles to divorce and tag her ass.

Regarding the typing lingo of women I find most semi-educated (2-years of college) make it a point to converse using proper grammar and words without the shorthands. The crazy ones looking to trap a man are particularly good at being effective at communication.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Anonymous wrote:

Regarding the typing lingo of women I find most semi-educated (2-years of college) make it a point to converse using proper grammar and words without the shorthands. The crazy ones looking to trap a man are particularly good at being effective at communication.

Interesting observation.
I also noticed that dumb chicks are naturally not very good at manipulating, but the smarter (with proper grammar) ones are the best manipulators and more dangerous long term.
dumb chicks IMO are less dangerous long term because they fail at anything complex and serious and can’t even keep their stories straight. So it’s easy to deconstruct them and figure them out.
really smart chicks are the one that can murder you, cover it up and collect your life insurance – calculating and ruthless
both are equally dangerous, but dumb c~~~s are much easier to read which makes them less dangerous to you

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9544]

I don’t think texting is just a woman’s issue. I think it’s more of a Millennial issue. You see too many people texting (which I hate doing) instead of talking to people, they don’t know how to spell, they use initials which I don’t understand half of them. Plus you see young people on phones as if they don’t know what else to use. My aunt and her teenage kids are practically married to their phones; they take it with them at the dinner table, when it’s family time, everywhere they go. I think texting is an improper way of communicating; in the real world, you HAVE to have real life people interaction skills, and things like texting, Facebook, and Twitter make person-to-person interactions suffer. Besides it takes longer to type out something than it is to say out loud, plus it’s harder to type it than the say it. The most ridiculous thing I heard with those who text are those who text each other when sitting next to each other.

This is one time I won’t blame an issue squarely on women, but on the younger generation. It’s the technology that the young are addicted to, not just woman alone.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Ned TrentParticipant 4894]

Regardless of what they fancy to achieve with their texting and no matter what style they use in that regard, one thing is for sure:

Over the last few decades women have gradually overstrained their own constant attention cravings as well as their ego up to an overinflated tipping point, which in essence gives us the very leverage that we now have to make them responsibly picking up the pieces.

And texting them back is one of the most counterproductive methods on our part.

I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

[RoyDalParticipant]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

Are they just lazy?

I’m going with “just lazy” on this one.
* Some messages can be compressed into the text message format. E.g., “meet you at our place at 7.”
* Many messages require tone of voice. E.g., “I love you.” (Is he running a con on the bitch, or does he really mean it? The tone of voice will provide her many valuable cues, which texting strips off.)
* Most messages require one human being facing another. Some sage said, “all communication is body language.” Given a world of con artists — and all women are natural born con artists — only face-to-face confrontation will suffice.
** Even then, you have to have a near-overdose of red pill to spot the con.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Women are grammar nazis, then turn around and misspell words. Another rule that’s set by them and later broke. So they control your actions, but don’t have any responsibility for their own actions. Typical hypocritical c~~~.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Anonymous 3]

Women are really just that dumb. The entire Western society is rigged to try and make them look less dumb, and it fools the dumber males among us, but if you have a decent IQ and some awareness it is too glaringly obvious to pretend otherwise. That’s probably why the system needs to tout 24/7 propaganda that women are equal or intellectual superiors. If it were really true they wouldn’t have to desperately keep pushing it. But if they stop for even a little while reality sets in so they can’t.

If you ever see “professional” female writers, their writing is generally awful. They hide behind “form” or “grammar” that is esoteric and transient, rules they themselves can’t adhere to but simply don’t allow themselves to be criticized for. One of the best tricks to use when a woman is trying to criticize you on something is to put on a fake countenance and ask her to show you how to do it because you can’t figure it out. Then repeat her exactly. She can’t criticize her own “teaching” and will hate having to show an example each time. Extra points if you innocently start asking about random bulls~~~ points and pointing out inconsistencies. Since you’re being too nice she can’t be passive aggressive and throw a fit, so she will just run away the first chance she gets.

In my lifetime I have yet to meet a woman that is objectively skilled at anything. They all feel they have the right to judge others, but they suck at everything. I now find it very funny and am incapable of even the tiniest bit of respect towards women, while ironically, they seem to accept my general dismissive behavior towards them without complaining.

[Anonymous 11]

There’s nothing sadder than watching a guy in a new relationship getting a text from the love of his life every 5 damn minutes. You really can’t even enjoy his company. Excessive texting is rude as hell.

F~~~ trying to have a conversation via text. I do use text, but it’s only for quick and dirty stuff not needing voice contact. “Be there at 1430” or “Need me to buy ice for the beer”.

As Roy mentioned, tone is damn important. With women being the way they are, I need tone to be able to detect and spin my way out of any hamster malfunctions. That can’t be done via text.

[XSDBSParticipant 3598]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

they take it with them at the dinner table

Whenever I go out to eat with a group of people, it takes about 30 seconds for the first phone to come out.
I’ll announce “The first person that looks at their phone pays the entire check.”
That phone is quickly stuffed away!

At Thanksgiving, I went around the table, collected 8 phones, and put them in another room so we couldn’t hear them.

[narwhalParticipant]

I actually like texting for quite a few situations. Many times I just want to contact someone quick and don’t want to end up getting drawn into some useless conversation. Say for example, you need to tell your mother something, but don’t want to hear the latest gossip about the neighbors. I have a buddy that I never talk to on the phone. We would much prefer to talk in person, so text to figure on when and where we’re meeting up works best.

As far as dealing with a woman, a text not only allows me to not hear her endlessly talking, but it always me to chose my words carefully. It’s said that the words are only a small part of communication, the rest is tone, facial expressions, etc. When you read a word, the tone etc is whatever the reader wants to “hear”. So that works in your favor too.

But I do agree that a display of bad grammar is a turn off, texting while in the company of others is rude, and you should not completely give up on actually talking with someone in favor of texts. Texting has it’s place and usefulness.

Ok. Then do it.

[black saltParticipant 25]

you guys that hate texting are missing out on its best benefit: it forces women to get to their point without all the rambling.

[Author]

Posts