Women and societal collapse

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Just stole this off of a comment on Niche Gamer but think it worth a post here. The West is going off the cliff thanks to female influence. I can’t switch on TV or films without being confronted by endless women and with the barbarians being invited in by feminist approved Govs all over Europe, it is only a matter of time before it all crashes and burns….and then women end up at the bottom again before the cycle begins again

[Anonymous 12]

Women never had to work for anything at all so if they burn something down it was never built by their hands anyway.

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant 6253]

Jim01 wrote:

Just stole this off of a comment on Niche Gamer but think it worth a post here. The West is going off the cliff thanks to female influence. I can’t switch on TV or films without being confronted by endless women and with the barbarians being invited in by feminist approved Govs all over Europe, it is only a matter of time before it all crashes and burns….and then women end up at the bottom again before the cycle begins again

Excellent points you raise, brother!

Everything happens in cycles. Energy and frequency all occur in cycles.

It seems like most people do not learn from past mistakes.

The universe re-balances itself out when there is an imbalance, i.e perhaps women trying to behave like men.

When the nurturer role is abandoned, it causes all sorts of issues; job scarcity for men, higher prices of food and services, more crime (men are frustrated that they cannot be a provider and protector since they struggle to find a job), men getting kicked in the face for trying their very best to provide and be a good husband and father etc.

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[Anonymous 38]

There are just so many problems now which all trace back to women’s growing influence. It would be a great topic for writing a controversial but eye-opening book.

[Anonymous 1]

Yes, History is Cyclical. Civilizations rise and fall. Feminism has always been correlated with the decline and fall stage of the Civilization. “Patriarchy” is always correlated with the rise and wealth building stage of Civilization.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

The more we do for them the worse it gets. And the s~~~ thing is the second we men try to live in a place where we don’t want women to move in, and their Government Protectors, they just keep f~~~ing s~~~ up.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I don’t think that feminism is in any risk of imploding in the next 20 years. Feminists are just gaining real political influence. Sweden has a feminist government and feminist foriegn policy not informed by toxic masculinity. The EU has a feminist party in it’s parliment.

The U.S. is infested with feminists. Feminists are a large lobbying block and determine much public policy today. Trump is trying to disarm these but the bias is so ingrained in people that their leftist ideology could never allow them to see men as victims.

Feminism will get much worse over the next 100 years with straight men relegated to jobs women can’t do and otherwise placed in single man ghetto’s.

Reproduction will eliminate the last notion standing in the way of full female control of the children, the idea that children need a father.

Despite all the studies, the feminist muscle is being flexed to eliminate the idea that children need a father. The last argument that men have for having any involvement in the lives of children.

Society will become more hostile to men and men will go their own way. The rate is huge and increasing.

Men are going their own way, but feminism will mold society for the next 100 years, IMO.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

I don’t think that feminism is in any risk of imploding in the next 20 years. Feminists are just gaining real political influence. Sweden has a feminist government and feminist foriegn policy not informed by toxic masculinity. The EU has a feminist party in it’s parliment.

The U.S. is infested with feminists. Feminists are a large lobbying block and determine much public policy today. Trump is trying to disarm these but the bias is so ingrained in people that their leftist ideology could never allow them to see men as victims.

Feminism will get much worse over the next 100 years with straight men relegated to jobs women can’t do and otherwise placed in single man ghetto’s.

Reproduction will eliminate the last notion standing in the way of full female control of the children, the idea that children need a father.

Despite all the studies, the feminist muscle is being flexed to eliminate the idea that children need a father. The last argument that men have for having any involvement in the lives of children.

Society will become more hostile to men and men will go their own way. The rate is huge and increasing.

Men are going their own way, but feminism will mold society for the next 100 years, IMO.

don’t agree

within 20 -30 years max birthrates mean that Europe will be islamic – that is a fact because they will gain more and more influence over our politicians and start getting more MPs (plus Islamic parties will start springing up)

Our politicians will probably put down any nationalist movements but even if they don’t then Europe will be Balkanised at the very least. Either way – feminism will end once all that starts and they realise that calling air conditioning sexist won’t stop an islamic gang from raping her

and also c~~~s like barbara spectre won’t be in charge even though they think they will be

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Jim01 wrote:

within 20 -30 years max birthrates mean that Europe will be islamic – that is a fact because they will gain more and more influence over our politicians and start getting more MPs (plus Islamic parties will start springing up)

Correct. The next generation is slated to be a sweeping demographic displacement. Native Europeans have 2-3 years, tops, to start s~~~ting out kids to keep up. Islam plays the long game.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[MonkParticipant 16978]

But who opened the door to women, knowing that they would cause havoc?

[Gravel PitParticipant]

I’m so sick of women’s s~~~. I dealt with a psychotic bitch over the weekend. Women have no idea what a warranty is, they just want everything for free and expect everything to be handed to them, free and perfect. They have no sense of accountability. If they aren’t bad enough, their pussy whipped husbands are just as irritating.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Monk wrote:

But who opened the door to women, knowing that they would cause havoc?

[MonkParticipant 16978]

Jim01 wrote:

within 20 -30 years max birthrates mean that Europe will be islamic – that is a fact because they will gain more and more influence over our politicians and start getting more MPs (plus Islamic parties will start springing up).

This has already happened – there has been a shadow ‘Muslim Parliament’ based in Birmingham for 30 years.

The Labour Party is steadily being taken over by Islamics. Which is ironic, given that Labour first opened the doors to mass immigration. They never expected that THEY would be ousted.

Our politicians will probably put down any nationalist movements but even if they don’t then Europe will be Balkanised at the very least.

Balkanisation is actually the EU’s stated objective. Nation states will be split up into small euro-fiefdoms which will then be centrally controlled.

A map of the proposed ‘New Europe’ was first published in the late 1970’s.

In the UK, you will notice that boundary changes (police, fire, local authorities, NHS regions etc), invariably coincide with these boundaries.

‘Seats of regional government’ (which frequently masquerade as ‘regional devleopment councils’ and the like), are already up and running and have been for decades.

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Monk wrote:

Jim01 wrote:

within 20 -30 years max birthrates mean that Europe will be islamic – that is a fact because they will gain more and more influence over our politicians and start getting more MPs (plus Islamic parties will start springing up).

This has already happened – there has been a shadow ‘Muslim Parliament’ based in Birmingham for 30 years.

The Labour Party is steadily being taken over by Islamics. Which is ironic, given that Labour first opened the doors to mass immigration. They never expected that THEY would be ousted.

Our politicians will probably put down any nationalist movements but even if they don’t then Europe will be Balkanised at the very least.

Balkanisation is actually the EU’s stated objective. Nation states will be split up into small euro-fiefdoms which will then be centrally controlled.

A map of the proposed ‘New Europe’ was first published in the late 1970’s.

In the UK, you will notice that boundary changes (police, fire, local authorities, NHS regions etc), invariably coincide with these boundaries.

‘Seats of regional government’ (which frequently masquerade as ‘regional devleopment councils’ and the like), are already up and running and have been for decades.

great post – thanks for the info and shame on me for being so ignorant

[No CountryParticipant 759]

Hopefully I am taking a dirt nap by the time it is all said and done. I am thankful I have no children to witness this.

[narwhalParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Yes, History is Cyclical. Civilizations rise and fall. Feminism has always been correlated with the decline and fall stage of the Civilization. “Patriarchy” is always correlated with the rise and wealth building stage of Civilization.

Although there are lessons to be learned, and history repeats itself, I can’t say with enough certainty that history is going to repeat again. The reason being that there a numerous other factors that change ‘the game’ that were not a factor in previous civilizations. The level of technology, communication, infrastructure, propaganda, placated masses, volume of people….are off the charts in comparison to past civilizations. I’d argue that Western civilization would have already collapsed without these factors.

Not saying a collapse won’t happen, just that I can’t say it’s a guarantee, that a reversal or status quo is possible, or anything like that.

I would say that I don’t think the future of the US and of Europe are tied together. It’s entirely possible that that Europe collapses while the US doesn’t, or some other variation.

Ok. Then do it.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

It is funny, growing up always heard that women were the peace makers. Then I got married and found out how untrue that whole notion was, my second wife would start fights with other people just so something would be going on.

Last thing we need is a woman in power anyplace.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[SamsquanchParticipant 4226]

Every civilization that has previously collapsed had better technology than the previous civilizations. We won’t be immune to the collapse.

[Anonymous 3]

narwhal wrote:

The level of technology, communication, infrastructure, propaganda, placated masses, volume of people….are off the charts in comparison to past civilizations.

… and I think this makes everything more fragile.

One has to consider what would happen to a modern country without electricity. People could not even access their money, because most of it is on computer databases.

The reliability of the whole system is compromised. There is no paper backup of records, as an example.

Oil rising to 200$ a barrel will shut down everything. It will start by transportation, then it will affect consumption, and suddenly all this “economy of scale” is gone.
Production is actually being centralized, and that model depends on transportation, global financial system, and a global production level only possible due to the excessive consumption.

One only has to remember that most products are being manufactured with programmed obsolescence (they are s~~~) to understand the magnitude of the problem. Once people cannot afford to buy a “new” same product, them the factories are going bankrupt.
And there will be no more products to buy, even if you had the money for it. Then we just have to wait until every s~~~ty products dies without a replacement.

With luck we will could go back to the 19th century technology, but unfortunately we no longer have 19th century population. So, we would have the “great dieoff”.

My guess is that governments will go tyrannical in order to keep the ball rolling. Soyent Green comes to my mind.

But then, I am an optimist. Maybe a natural pandemic will finish us quick. Or nuclear/biological war. One has to think positively.

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant 6253]

I use to work in a mine doing 2 weeks on and 1 week off……it is BOILING HOT……working on jumbo drill rigs like this:

What next:

> the office smells like man (spray the office with flower fragrance)
> the office chairs are designed for men’s backs
> the office furniture is man colors (change it to pink)
> the office water cooler is too cold

This how a company collapses.

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[Author]

Posts