Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Woman wants to start boycott of MGTOW
This topic contains 79 replies, has 51 voices, and was last updated by 
Samsquanch 2 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Also, did anyone notice that she tried to link MGTOW with PUA culture? That was her entire basis for her whole bulls~~~ line of how we feel entitled to rape.
I was involved with the PUA scene about 15 years ago. I even went to a David D’Angelo seminar in NYC. I couldn’t buy what he was selling. He basically was saying you have to take on a specific persona (i.e. his patented “c~~~y & funny” routine) to get hot girls.
We all know while that tactic might get you a hookup every so often, it’s not sustainable especially if that isn’t your natural personality. And I would hazard a guess that, for most of the guys on here (being by our very nature independent thinkers), that this isn’t our natural personalities.
This “professor” also makes the faulty assumption that we still GIVE A S~~~ about women.
One should NEVER ASSUME…
–CNM
Quote from a former boss: "Don't get married...the fucking you get ain't worth the fucking you get."
[Female] Hmmm. The bulls all left, better close this gate. AND DON’T COME BACK, COW RAPISTS!
I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.
She wants men to value sex so highly that we would be willing to commit a felony to get it. As long as she has something that we value that much, then she has value. But the asking price is now so high, that buyers are leaving the market. No buyers = no value at all.
To paraphrase my favorite actor:
THE TRUTH IS THAT THE WALL IS GOING TO TAKE THAT VALUE FROM YOU!!! YOUR VALUE IS MAINTAINED BY ME!!! AND BY OTHER MEN LIKE ME!!! BECAUSE WE CHOOSE TO MAINTAIN IT. AND IN PLACES DEEP DOWN INSIDE THAT YOU NEVER TALK ABOUT AT PARTIES, YOU WANT ME TO PROTECT YOU FROM THAT WALL. YOU NEED ME TO PROTECT YOU FROM THAT WALL. YOU SPEAK OF THE TRUTH?
YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!
This professor hit the wall a long time ago. She probably never saw it coming. Now she crones on about how we want to rape her. She is in denial. Deep down, she knows that even real rapists wouldn’t choose her anymore.
Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you
Rebecca Sullivan from University of Calgary feels entitled to rape 13 yo girls.
I have the proofs: Sullivan praised “The Vagina Monologues” by Eve Ensler.
“The Vagina Monologues” by Eve Ensler depicts in a positive light an adult woman like Sullivan having sex with a 13 yo girl:“I don’t know if it was rape or not, but if it was rape then it was a good rape”.
Sex between an adult and a person under 16 is rape in Canada: even sex between Rebecca Sullivan and a 13 yo girl is rape – it doesn’t matter if she’s a feminist and/or lesbian. Being lesbian or feminist doesn’t give a pass to f~~~ 13 yo girls.
That’s what Rebecca Sullivan praise.
That’s what Rebecca Sullivan teach to her students.Sue me, Rebecca Sullivan.
I have the proofs for what I just wrote.WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse.
No way that a feminist could win against me.
I know too much about their ideology and how they think and act.SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Those who genuinely fear that documentary and wish it banned are personification of bigotry.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
the monologue “The Little Coochie Snorcher That Could”, in which an adult woman recalls being given alcohol and statutorily raped at 13 by a 24-year-old woman[22] as a positive, healing experience, ending the segment with the proclamation “It was a good rape.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vagina_Monologues#Robert_Swope_critique
THE SAME CRITICISM EVEN FROM SOME FEMINISTS!!!
http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2002/0212.htmlThe play is meant to decry rape and other violence against women. Yet, the original performances of the play and the published book eulogize lesbian “rape” of a 13-year-old girl by a 24-year-old woman who plies her with alcohol. The pedophile section is entitled “The Little Coochi Snorcher That Could” — Coochi Snorcher being the nickname of the little girl’s genitalia. Her vagina’s tale of seduction begins, “She gently and slowly lays me out on the bed…”
After becoming more graphic, the little girl gratefully concludes, “I’ll never need to rely on a man.”
Both by statute and by feminist definition, the “seduction” scene is rape. Nevertheless, the Coochi Snorcher declares, “…if it was rape, it was a good rape.”
Such idealization of child molestation would have created a firestorm of outrage if the offending character had been male. But the molester was female, so “The Vagina Monologues” won an OBIE Award on Broadway and noted actresses clamored to be included in the cast. When the New York Times reported the buzz about Ensler, it called her “the Messiah heralding the second wave of feminism.”
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Those who genuinely fear that documentary and wish it banned are personification of bigotry.
They are scared s~~~less of us. Look how they treat KKK documentaries and propaganda…its just kinda like “They’re just a small group of wingnuts just let them have their rally and a website nobody goes to and ignore them.”
Why are they coming down so much harder on MGTOW and TRP than the KKK? We don’t preach hatred or violence, we just want to do our own thing in life, and they view that as a threat? The cat is out of the bag and they are terrified of what the end result will be as more and more men realize the truth and GTOW.
Anonymous2BAHAHAHAHA! Let me get this straight: she’s going to boycott something that is about avoiding whiny, entitled bitches like her in the first place?! Oh, no! Whatever will we do now?!
MGTOW: “Pussy is overrated. I’m going to live my life doing what’s best for me, and focusing on what makes me happy. I’m not going to go spending all my money on women just for the chance to get some pussy, and I’m not going to go taking the chance of losing all of my money, assets, and future income by getting married, or risk losing the right to be a father to my children. I’m going to work on making myself happy.”
Feminist response: “OMG! You MGTOWs just want to rape women! I’m boycotting all of you!”
Can somebody please tell me where the F~~~ the logic lies in that response?! Does this bitch even have a f~~~ing brain in her head? How f~~~ing spoiled and entitled do you have to be when your response to men no longer wanting to deal with your bulls~~~ and taking part in a system that only benefits you is to accuse them of being rapists? There is absolutely no logic to this at all.
Frankly the thought of having a sexual encounter with another human being disgusts me. But I’m sure she’d get p~~~ed off at that because “gasp” a man doesn’t want to have sex with her.
No one knows the true worth of a man.
BAHAHAHAHA! Let me get this straight: she’s going to boycott something that is about avoiding whiny, entitled bitches like her in the first place?! Oh, no! Whatever will we do now?!
MGTOW: “Pussy is overrated. I’m going to live my life doing what’s best for me, and focusing on what makes me happy. I’m not going to go spending all my money on women just for the chance to get some pussy, and I’m not going to go taking the chance of losing all of my money, assets, and future income by getting married, or risk losing the right to be a father to my children. I’m going to work on making myself happy.”
Feminist response: “OMG! You MGTOWs just want to rape women! I’m boycotting all of you!”
Can somebody please tell me where the F~~~ the logic lies in that response?! Does this bitch even have a f~~~ing brain in her head? How f~~~ing spoiled and entitled do you have to be when your response to men no longer wanting to deal with your bulls~~~ and taking part in a system that only benefits you is to accuse them of being rapists? There is absolutely no logic to this at all.
That’s not what she’s doing.
She is asking protection to Big Daddy Trudeau screaming “HELP ME! THOSE EVIL MEN WANT TO RAPE WOMEN!”
She’s asking Trudeau to declare both MRA and MGTOW being “hate groups”.
Now there is, on such group, a reference to her support for lesbian statutory rape through her praise for “The Vagina Monologues”.
I can go much further: in the library of her department there are the S.C.U.M. Manifesto by Solanas, books by Sheila Jeffreys, Sally Miller-Gearhart, Mary Daly, and so on.Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and destroy the male sex.
Those are the first lines of the S.C.U.M. Manifesto.
This is state-funded hatred towards half humanity – including the moronic mangina named Justin Trudeau.Rebecca Sullivan can claim that it’s just a joke.
Rebecca Sullivan can claim that it was just a rant.
What Rebecca Sullivan cannot claim is that MGTOW support men raping women.Her main error, however, was attacking The Red Pill movie, that’s due her ignorance.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
But I’m sure she’d get p~~~ed off at that because “gasp” a man doesn’t want to have sex with her.
Dude, no man has wanted to have sex with that woman in a lonnnnnggg time.
A little lesson to all brothers.
The feminist discourse:
First they agree with you, and they’re “empathic”
Then there’s the “BUT”
You can simply select the part containing their requests by using “search text” and selecting “BUT”
That applies to EVERY feminist speech asking for advantages while wanting to keep unfairly down men, always.
Let’s try with Rebecca Sullivan
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/mra-political-parties-1.4016680Sullivan says the rhetoric has muddled the message of the men’s rights movement, which has some legitimate and complex concerns.
“[They] point to a number of very real issues in our society. There are very few resources available to men who experience domestic or gender or sexual violence, to the fact that suicide rates are very high for men, incarceration culture, high drop-out rates, lower participation in post-secondary education,” she said.
“There are very real and pressing and urgent issues, but they go from there immediately to ‘it’s women’s fault’ because they are denying men their natural rights as men … It is pathetic but it is also dangerous and really, really scary.”
See what happen after the first “but” found by the search text. You can skip every part before the first “but”, it’s just a smoke screen.
This kind of speech is the same that wives use to convince husbands:
“I love you, you’re a good man, I’m aware that you make sacrifices…blablahblah…BUT…”
Every MGTOW who have been married will immediatly recognize the scheme.
Feminism is just female nature brought into politic realm.
Feminism is the wife of the state.
The wife is just asking her husband to beat the guy who did made her uncomfortable.SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Boycott MGTOW? That shows you how stupid and crazy the average feminist is, one can’t ban an acronym.
Sovereignty above all else.
How would you actually boycott MGTOW?
Change laws that don’t f~~~ over men?
Stop acting like woman are the center of the universe?If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.
she’s confusing words “boycott” with “criminalize”
proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome
<iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/mPMbelZWhRo?feature=oembed” allowfullscreen=”” width=”500″ height=”281″ frameborder=”0″></iframe>
You heard it, gents–they’re going to start a BOYCOTT of us in Canada! Gee whiz, I’m going to have to sell off my 463 shares of MGTOW stock. Dammit…there goes my 401(k)!
Why this BOYCOTT of our valuable products and services??? Because apparently we want the right to rape women! That’s right! This GORGEOUS SJW is afraid that we want “to have sex with whom we want, when we want.”
How much you wanna bet that this MOP-HEADED WITCH-BITCH has NO PROBLEM wanting sex with whomever SHE wants, when SHE wants???
Those grapes must be REALLY SOUR…EH???
–CNM
BUT….MGTOW is a BOYCOTT of Women! So a Woman want to Boycott Men who are Boycotting Women…well…that will be effective! I’m sure it will shut MGTOW down! What an IDIOT!
Cheering this RP MRA movie is a huge waist
frankly my dear i don't give a damn
she’s confusing words “boycott” with “criminalize”
It has been tried before.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachelor_tax
If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.
Someone should correct her and refer to it as a:
Mancott
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
