Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Within campuses women cannot consent to sex with men, NEVER.
This topic contains 17 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by 
Varun 3 years, 8 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
According feminists women are too stupid to understand if they consented or not, so heterosexual sex is always rape
Grant Neal, a CSU Pueblo pre-med major and athlete, began a relationship with Jane Doe (as identified in Neal’s lawsuit), although she, as a student in the Athletic Training Program, was not supposed to fraternize with athletes. Jane Doe texted an invitation to Neal to come to her apartment. The following is from Neal’s complaint against CSU Pueblo:
“As the intimacy progressed, knowing that they both wanted to engage in sexual intercourse, Jane Doe advised Plaintiff that she was not on birth control. Accordingly, Plaintiff asked if he should put on a condom. Jane Doe clearly and unequivocally responded ‘yes.’ … They proceeded to engage in consensual sexual intercourse, during which Jane Doe … demonstrated her enjoyment both verbally and non-verbally.”
The next day, one of Jane Doe’s classmates, who neither witnessed nor was told of any assault, noticed a hickey on the woman’s neck. Assuming an assault must have happened, the classmate told school officials that an assault had occurred. Jane Doe told school officials the sex was consensual: “I’m fine and I wasn’t raped.” Neal’s lawsuit says she told an administrator: “Our stories are the same and he’s a good guy. He’s not a rapist, he’s not a criminal, it’s not even worth any of this hoopla!” Neal recorded on his cellphone Jane Doe saying that nothing improper had transpired, and soon the two again had intercourse.
Undeterred, CSU Pueblo mixed hearsay evidence with multiple due process violations, thereby ruining a young man’s present (he has been suspended from the school for as long as Jane Doe is there) and blighting his future (his prospects for admission to another school are bleak).
Finally, feminists are reaching – within campuses – their wettest dream: outlawing heterosexual sex, regardless the involved women enjoyed it or not.
So, I’m going to fix the policy of CSU with the truth
http://www.csupueblo.edu/CounselingCenter/SelfHelp/Pages/Rape.aspxMyth: When a woman says “no” to sex, she really means, “yes”.
Fact:
When a woman says no, that is what she means. Men will use violence and aggression to obtain sex. Women do not want to have sex against their will.Women cannot consent to sex with men – it doesn’t matter if women says “no” or “yes”: when women have sex with men it’s always rape – all men are rapists, all women are victimsFinally, the right version…
Worth noticing that even the original lines I deleted are horribly sexists and biased against men, defining women as victims and men as rapists…
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Great post.
It’s true. They want place maximum restrictions on men.
If college men must date, date Townie girls.
My opinion is this part of the radical lesibians who want females to go gay. Think about, if men cannot or will not date females they have a better chance of being recruited.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
Anonymous42Why is it that you never hear of lesbian rape on campus? Gay rape on campus? Always male on female rape? It shows just how far the roots of feminism with it’s 50 years misandry actually goes.
I go by U-Mass on every trip to Vermont, when the back road was closed a detour sent traffic straight through, I could spot the feminists from their circus like hair-doo, and butt ugly faces. I think feminism attracts mostly women that can’t get a man no matter what they do. I mean BUTT F~~~ING UGLY!Why can’t the campus leave it to the police?
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
Great post.
It’s true. They want place maximum restrictions on men.
If college men must date, date Townie girls.
My opinion is this part of the radical lesibians who want females to go gay. Think about, if men cannot or will not date females they have a better chance of being recruited.
Bingo.
There’s no such thing as an “heterosexual feminist”: “heterosexual feminist” is an oxymoron, a contradiction in terms.
Feminists also praise lesbian rape and lesbian paedophilia: Eve Ensler’s “The Vagina Monologues”, widely celebrated by feminists, shows in a very positive light an adult woman having sex with a 13 yo girlThe Little Coochie Snorcher That Could, in which a woman recalls memories of traumatic sexual experiences in her childhood and a self-described “positive healing” sexual experience in her adolescent years with an older woman. This particular skit has sparked outrage, numerous controversies and criticisms due to its content, among which the most famous is the Robert Swope controversy (see below). In the original version, she is 13, but later versions changed her age to 16. It also originally included the line, “If it was rape, it was a good rape”, which was removed from later versions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Vagina_Monologues
Feminists plays that every year, on V-Day, February, 14.
“why is rape only wrong when a man commits it, but when it’s by a woman committed against another woman, who just happens to be 13-years-old, it is celebrated and a university club sponsors it?”
“because men are adults and women are always children: children cannot rape each other!”SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Why can’t the campus leave it to the police?
Because feminists’ goal never had been about punishing real rapists: feminists’ goal is banning heterosexuality from campuses and hurting all boys just because they’re boys.
Under such rules:* A real rapist is expelled.
* A guy who is accused by his lover is expelled. Regardless the evidences.
* A guy who is NOT accused by his lover but just only a by random feminist is expelled, even if the lover says he didn’t rape her.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
I don’t think eliminating heterosexuality is their purpose. If it were, they would be against marriage too.
They’re just trying to inflate the rape statistics so that they can play the victim and get more
rightsprivileges.They ran out of problems to solve, so they are creating new ones to stay in business.
A man shouldn't make his life's objective to be on the side of the majority, but to avoid finding himself in the ranks of the insane. (Marcus Aurelius)
Great post.
It’s true. They want place maximum restrictions on men.
I am so looking forward to when the colleges are shut down. Colleges have become everything wrong with society. Colleges are toxic places where bigotry is spread against men. Colleges are tax funded welfare for Ivy League elitists. And colleges are a con game to make young adults debt slaves with no hope, nor future.
Well, for decades, the Ivy League elitists have been preaching for a communist revolution. With each passing day that looks more like a possibility. But, when that communist revolution happens, the Ivy League elitist are going to be the first victims as the communist revolutionaries tear into their bourgeoisie asses.
The whole feminist agenda is a death sentence for men.
Evil.
As in satanic evil.
Anti life.I don’t think eliminating heterosexuality is their purpose. If it were, they would be against marriage too.
They’re just trying to inflate the rape statistics so that they can play the victim and get more
rightsprivileges.They ran out of problems to solve, so they are creating new ones to stay in business.
Feminists on campuses wish to eliminate heterosexuality from campuses.
Most women – so called “not feminists” – are quite content with this approach, not because they dislike heterosexual sex on the whole but because for most women heterosexual sex is a mean, not a goal – sex on campuses is usually casual sex or unserious relationships: most women don’t wish such things, they couldn’t care less, they wish long-term relationships with a lot of commitment from men, then marrying up them. After 7 years, divorce-raping men.SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Is it any wonder why men are abandoning higher “education”?
@el You are right when you say ‘any form of heterosexual sex is rape’. From all the examples, I can infer only this: sex is rape.
Now even if the woman says that it was consensual and she had not been raped, the guy woud still face some sort of ramification.
Their loss. What would be the result? At last, women would be left alone to fend for themselves, no matter how good or bad they are, each and every woman will face the consequence of their brethren’s actions.
I pity the women who would have to face the consequences; even though they might never have hurt anybody, they’d stil have to pay the price.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
Men need to avoid marriage and universities these days lol
Feminists agenda? They just make it up as they go along.
Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.
@el You are right when you say ‘any form of heterosexual sex is rape’. From all the examples, I can infer only this: sex is rape.
Now even if the woman says that it was consensual and she had not been raped, the guy woud still face some sort of ramification.
Their loss. What would be the result? At last, women would be left alone to fend for themselves, no matter how good or bad they are, each and every woman will face the consequence of their brethren’s actions.
I pity the women who would have to face the consequences; even though they might never have hurt anybody, they’d stil have to pay the price.
Why do you pity those women?
Having a man is not their right, just like having a woman is not a right for a man.
Women have to earn a man, just like men have to earn a woman.
The rules of the game have changed, and the rules will continue to change.
We have to adapt.
Sex is dangerous? Sex toys.
Women tried all those things before men, in order to gain power over us: dildos had been invented more than 100 years before fleshlights, in the Victorian era in UK, and are widespread since at least 40 years.
Feminist separatism was already a thing years before I was born, and I’m 43 yo.
Women totally failed at being separatist, and gained a good empowerment from dildoes, making them even more entitled and feeling precious.
Now it’s our turn: we are deploying the male versions of their same weapons.
I bet the outcome will be very different, much better, because men are not exactly like women: we are generally much more focused on the goal 😀SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
You know…my mother has had two husbands in her lifetime. She married her first one, had my sister, then divorced him and married my dad. So OK, strictly speaking my sister and I are step-siblings, but I can’t usually be bothered with technicalities. It’s just easier to address her the conventional way.
Anyway, my mum has said in the past that me and her daughter are the best things to ever happen to her (she doesn’t know that I’m a MGHOW. I doubt that she’d stop loving me if I told her, but for the sake of avoiding drama, I don’t feel it necessary to bring it up).
Now I wonder how she’d feel if I was to inform her that me and my sister are the results of rape. Because apparently, feminists – the same ones for whom my mum has occasionally expressed admiration – believe that all heterosexual encounters fall into this category. Should I mention that at the next family dinner? “Mum, did you know that your first two husbands raped you? Because you’re too stupid to properly consent to sex. That means that being raped was the best thing to ever happen to you. It also means that you planned to get raped, given that I was a planned child.”
Somehow I don’t think that she’d react favourably to this. And that’s what these s~~~heads don’t understand – every time they make their pathetic little declarations, they’re insulting everybody. They’re calling my dad a rapist and my mum stupid. Because EQUALITY!
To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell
Of course women have managed to ruin college and university, by making it all about them and their stupid problems, whether imagined, or real.
Why do you pity those women?
What you said is true. But “earned” is not the type of education that they’ll get. “Entitled” is more like it.
My purple-pilled visions depicted of a world where there are socialy responsible women who took liability for their actions; albeit their shaming, reckless fighting, feminist mentality… just one or two traits wuld have pushed me back over the fence. But even after activey searching for it, I didn’t get one. All those ‘anti-feminist’ women had ulterior motives of their own. Once they acquired that, they couldn’t caer to give a s~~~ about men’s issues.
Think about this: women aren’t born with the “entitlement” attitude; its ‘taught’ to them. Its alright to tell an 8 year old girl that she is a “fairy princess” but by the time she reaches 14-15 they must be given the “you get what you earn” education. But we don’t see that. They would only get told “The world is yours *smiley face* Do whatever you want. You are supreme. *more smiley faces*” when actually it should be “Don’t expect another to pay for your needs. You must work at east to satisfy your basic needs.” <- I believed this could have rid them of their “entitlement” issues. I know its harder than it sounds like, but this is where rea injustice is bred. Had they beed given a better education, they would have actually made a difference; they could actually be valuable.
If there was a real hard-working, self-sufficient woman anywhere in this word, she’d have know exactly what I was talking about.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
