Wikipedia is sinking.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

Anonymous wrote:

Wikipedia does a donation drive at the end of every year. How do you think they stay up in the first place?

Also I don’t know why you classify it as feminist. I use it for tech and to check entertainment or athlete records usually. It’s a pretty solid source.

Wikipedia is s~~~. It’s basically snopes in disguise. A left-wing rag, like most free stuff. And yes, it’s feminist. The only info you can rely on are the stuff you already know. You can go to Wikipedia to verify stuff you already know to be true, and get the spelling or citation of something, sometimes, but other then that, it’s a left-wing rag.

ghost wrote:

Same here. I find Wikipedia to be very useful. Anyone can update the records on Wikipedia, provided that the information is factual and cited. You can also challenge the information if you have different facts.

Wikipedia is a solid website in my opinion.

Wrong on all accounts. Wikipedia is not useful because it lacks integrity. If half the info is bulls~~~, then you can’t trust anything on it. That’s how integrity works.

Not anyone can update records on it. Have you even tried? The pages are moderated, and when you update something, the moderator immediately removes it if it’s not left-wing propaganda.

On Wikipedia, you can cite websites. Uh…. ok, then. See the men’s comments from above regarding creating websites.

[Anonymous 14]

anonymousyam wrote:

Anyone can contribute to wikipedia thereby s~~~ will happen and that is outside of the owners being liberal.

And therein lies the problem. The ARMY of enlisted, paid shills for Israel and Leftist Globalist agenda are hands down the biggest players, therefore they shape the “Truth” via having the most resources to throw into the arena. Jewish influence has, hands down, been playing the game of control media/publishing for many decades now, maybe a century, far better than any other group on the planet. Wikipedia is just the latest battlefield.

[Remove me!Participant]

Carnage wrote:

MrMe wrote:

Numerator wrote:

Carnage wrote:

I don’t like Wikipedia, too much info for free is bad for me.

You are messed up dude. You know that. But don’t gloat, I am just nicer around the holidays.

How do you get to be a physician for such a morose man?

I agree, this guy doesn’t seem to fit the medical profile at all.

Ohhh I wasn’t like this, but I learned.

I used to care about the people, the family, the society, the patients, and I got s~~~ on.

Now I do my job, I’m a diligent doctor, but is for me, I treat you and heal you and tell you what to do to be healthy, if you do good for me (less taxes to pay medical stuff, more working people, better for economy)

If you don’t, better for me (I earn more money out of you).

Im not a bad doctor just a NFG person, I treat you with the intended to heal you, to keep my reputation as a Med up. I have no plans to abuse you, becouse at the end it will come out and I wold get screwed, but is all about ME.

If being a doctor wasn’t my job I wold not give a f~~~ about anyone health, IS NOT MY F~~~ING PROBLEM.

I like the fact that Carnage is a doc. It’s like he’s a walking contradiction.

Like a bird on the wire, like a drunk midnight choir, I have tried in my way to be free.

[Anonymous 1]

Monk wrote:

Myself and a few others actually experimented with this, and saw edits and re-edits removed within minutes.

Some entries definately have watchers.

I’ve tried editing some Wikipedia entries too. Same results, they removed within minutes. There are definitely full time censors on Wikipedia, maybe thats why they need money. They need to pay all their full time censors.

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

Anonymous wrote:

I think it’s s~~~. They removed the 9/11 Dancing Jews page, changed the definition of Semite awhile back, and push the Russian interference narrative as if it were fact. There are armies of paid people working hard to manipulate that site into Leftist / Hide S~~~ agenda 24/7. Spend some time snooping around to find out what kind of wars have gone on on some of these topics, do it long enough and you will feel violated even clicking on that site in the future.

Yep, I read a while back there’s actually a team of unwashed lesbians who trawl Wikipedia in relay “feminizing” all the contentious content.

If I want to know who was 2nd substitute on the bench for Tottenham Hotspur FC in the 1991 FA Cup final, Wikipedia is ace. If I want facts on news or history I avoid it, or read it with a bucket of salt ready to gulp down.

[Author]

Posts