Why the f~~~ are women allowed to vote?

[The Skank SpankerParticipant 1372]

1. Men build this world, every brick you see was put there by a man, why should women get a say in what we do with it?

2. Women are guided by emotions while our world is ruled by logic. They live in a sugarcoated fantasy world. Whichever politician makes them feel “good”, get her vote. Why should they vote?

3. Women mainly don’t know s~~~ about politics (unless they talk about welfare or alimony). They do not care about it, they rather find out about the latest fashion trends.

4. Judicial bias: men are more often convicted and get harder sentences than women do. Why should women get a say in this?

5. Women cannot be drafted or serve in combat positions, so why should they decide in politics that send brave soldiers in war? Sickening. If Hillary would become the president, she would be allowed to send thousands of men to their death.

6. Women do not contribute to society in an equal way men do. Women should start doing their fair share first. They have part-time jobs and are on paternaty leave for the most time. Heck never work again after getting kids.

7. Ever since women were allowed to vote, the system took a turn for the worse. Look what happened to our world ever since women got to vote? Everything went to s~~~ due to women rights movements and changing legal aspects.

I just wrote these freely, feel free to add some more.

PS, I like this quote: “If women ruled the world there would be no war, just a bunch of jealous countries not talking to each other”

[HitmanParticipant]

Their husbands were the politicians. .they sucked those c~~~s.they got the vote. …something like that. .

[Anonymous 11]

Easy, who else would rabidly support any passing any law under the Sun “For the children”. The politicians need these hordes of gullible women for a solid power base.

[Anonymous 26]

Canadian women, simps, white knights and manginas just recently voted in a new inexperienced silver spooner as prime minister because he’s got sexy hair. The f~~~er never earned a blister in his life for minimum wage on a 10 hour shift!

Thanks bitches…. the worse is yet to come, and I’ll be standing there ready to say….. “I told you so” !

[OldBillParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

The politicians need these hordes of gullible women for a solid power base.

Bingo. Women have the vote for the same reason governments have spent the last few generations creating a permanent underclass. Women and people swilling from the public trough can be counted on the vote for continued and expanded statist policies.

Alexis de Tocqueville toured the US in the 1830s in order to investigate the only large democratic republic in existence at the time. While the term didn’t exist as the time, de Tocqueville was a essentially a political scientist and was interested in explaining a working democracy to a French (and European) population slowly groping towards the same political system.

In his works, de Tocqueville famously observed that the American republic would last as until Congress began bribing the citizenry with their own money. Such bribery began during the pre-WW1 Progressive Era, picked up steam with FDR in the 30s, and grew explosively in the 60s with LBJ. We’ve entire generations now who cannot conceive of the government not providing them with any number of benefits and, when roused by their masters, such people can be counted on to flood the polls.

Thatcher observed that the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other peoples money. Sadly, only a collapse of our current system will wean those filth from the public teat.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

I blame women’s suffrage on manginas. Women are master manipulators, and while MGTOW’s may not be easily manipulated, manginas are easy targets.

A lot of men somehow lost their masculinity. All we can do is walk away from the current system. And maybe educate others who are looking for answers.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Saudi Arabia just granted women the vote. They have a monarchy so I didn’t even know they had elections. It’ll be interesting to see what happens there in the next 20 – 30 years.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[EekParticipant 1162]

Women are allowed to vote, because after 5 years of war in WW1 (10 Million mostly men dead), the Spanish Flu (50 Million dead), and 40 years of the Women’s suffrage movement nagging they were too tired to smack them down. Bingo, 1920 you get UK and US both allowing the women’s vote. That sound you heard was the toilet flushing on western society, and we have been circling the drain ever since.

[RoyDalParticipant]

The causes of women’s suffrage are rooted in economic reality.
Back in the bad old days, when an entire generation of men had died off in WW1, there was a severe shortage of male breadwinners (and let us not forget all those women handing out white feathers). The result was a surplus of women who had to support themselves.

Yes, they sent their men off to war with a grand parade, and then they ended up making war materials in a dingy factory — probably the same factory their men had enlisted to get out of.

Of course they needed the vote! They had to support themselves for the first time in the past two centuries. (This applies to middle & upper class women only: The poor women always had to support themselves. But who cares about the lower classes?) Literally, their physical survival depended on their ability to get paying jobs. As an unforeseen side effect, their struggle for survival would also give rise to Modern Feminism. Once the majority got the vote and discovered the infinite source of money (us, the taxpayers), then the doom of Western Democracy was fixed — just as de Tocqueville predicted, oh so long ago.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[narwhalParticipant]

I wouldn’t really do anything about women voting. I actually think there are a lot of women who vote with a more educated viewpoint then quite a bit of men. Besides, it was pretty much inevitable as the modernizes, and you’ll never get that cat back in the bag.

Personally, I don’t think the founding fathers were that far off when they required property ownership to vote. I don’t think that would work today, but I think it would definitely help if you were required to pay taxes (federal income taxes) in order to vote. That would cut out a lot of the “spending other people’s” money. Perhaps a better solution would be to have a congress that decides government spending, where only tax payers vote in the delegates, and a second congress that all citizen’s could vote in for laws that do not have anything to do with spending. For example, the 1st congress would deal with military, education, etc funding. The second congress would deal with laws regarding citizen rights like right to work, regulations, etc. The 2nd congress could do something like Obamacare, but would require the 1st congress to agree on funding.

The there is the idea that you must serve time in the military to earn your vote. Not a huge fan of that, but it’s better then an “unearned vote”.

The point is, the vote shouldn’t be free. Those that contribute to the welfare of our country should be the one’s deciding it’s direction. That said though, I’m not suggesting there should be no welfare or assistance programs, or that those who don’t pay taxes should be ignored. Just that those who have nothing should be able to use the government to indirectly take money from those that do.

Ok. Then do it.

[NotMyProblemParticipant 965]

I’ve been wondering this myself.

Not my property... Not my problem

[Author]

Posts