Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Why Are We in Decline-Cultural Marxism (Video)
This topic contains 12 replies, has 6 voices, and was last updated by 
Phantom 4 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
I am still watching this video, and am finding it very informative, as well as being concerned about what our world will look like in 5-10 yrs from now. I know, as if now isn’t bad enough, right?
I decided for this new year, that I wanted to try and refine my plans on what I would like to accomplish in the next 5yrs, so I am trying to broaden my gaze.
I have never before really wanted to follow politics that much, so I am really behind on it, I wont lie.
The left, to varying degrees depending on the person, is diametrically opposed to the founding principles America was built upon. This is not debatable. Their actions are proof positive. Idealists are nation destroyers because they have no principles or adhere to historical precedents, just their fanatical devotion to ideas that never last once established in the real world. Their followers are nothing but bloodthirsty vermin lying in wait until they have enough power to unleash their fury through mob “justice”. They are cowards one and all.
The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.Just finished the video…damn, it’s cram packed with info.
Idealists are nation destroyers because they have no principles or adhere to historical precedents, just their fanatical devotion to ideas that never last once established in the real world.
I don’t see feminism going away, just continuing on and on. At any rate, a nation destroyed sounds lasting (to me) in the real world.
Their followers are nothing but bloodthirsty vermin lying in wait until they have enough power to unleash their fury through mob “justice”. They are cowards one and all.
I have never looked at riot police like that, but yeah, you make a damn good point there. Which brings me to one of my biggest concerns…Just how much more power will the government have to have, before they have enough, to unleash their fury through mob “justice” upon us men (citizens)?
Yes. This turd of a world is swirling down toilet bowl.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
Why does everybody act like the constitution is so great? The federalists were pushing for ratification and they didn’t want a bill of rights (cause well the states had that!). They wanted to be king. Anything good about the constitution is thanks to the ANTI federalists. Now we have a socialist oligarchy that no one can ever make smaller (even someone as conservative as Cruz). What we need are improved articles of confederation and scrap the constitution all together. They had it right before the federalist raped this brand new nation. All they needed to do was have a standing army, give congress the power to collect taxes (but only from the state legislatures, not the people directly), and we’d have been FINE! kay okay. I’ll shut up now.
-By the by, here’s my idea for what the future has in store for MGTOW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jtCiTvQ37E if anyone is interested.
F!@#Guilt YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6hQIbzFPm5RBfsjm2pCGgA
-By the by, here’s my idea for what the future has in store for MGTOW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jtCiTvQ37E if anyone is interested.
I just watched your video….Gonna have to agree to disagree with you on what it means for ME to be a mghow.
You say, among other things, that men are no longer holding society together. I don’t see all this work being done by females. engineers, construction, sanitation, hard labor on oil rigs, repairing machines, maintaining machinery in automated factories, etc. So, until that day comes…which imho, will be never, I am unable to subscribe to your point of view.
I have no desire to go back to the plantation, or the rat race, nor do I have any intention of being a sperm bank or walking ATM on any level, whether it be by a female or sanctioned by ANY form of ANY govt.
Nor do I have any intention to pay for sex to a gender that screams nothing but utter contempt (and that’s putting it mildly) of me being a man.
As for baby farms, and men, by law (as you stated it) having to give their sperm, to keep up the population quota to continue feeding the machine so-to-speak…I refuse to be subject to that as well.
Freedom is by far, always better than the illusion of freedom. Hell, it isn’t even the same freaking ballpark. Not only is it not a contender, it’s just flat out, no contest.
Having rights and liberties taken away, with all the shaming & degrading & hating on us….with, what seems to be a never ending cycle of it just being more and more, as time continues to go by is just beyond being obscene & absurd…even calling it a perversion isn’t harsh enough, IMHO, on these crimes of humanity against us men. As you stated in your video, you said you see feminism continuing to grow and dominate, etc….
I don’t know if you have checked this out, but it is certainly worth the time…
cheers bro,
RespectfullyPeace
Why does everybody act like the constitution is so great? The federalists were pushing for ratification and they didn’t want a bill of rights (cause well the states had that!). They wanted to be king. Anything good about the constitution is thanks to the ANTI federalists. Now we have a socialist oligarchy that no one can ever make smaller (even someone as conservative as Cruz). What we need are improved articles of confederation and scrap the constitution all together. They had it right before the federalist raped this brand new nation. All they needed to do was have a standing army, give congress the power to collect taxes (but only from the state legislatures, not the people directly), and we’d have been FINE! kay okay. I’ll shut up now.
-By the by, here’s my idea for what the future has in store for MGTOW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jtCiTvQ37E if anyone is interested.
The anti-federalist AND the federalist like Madison were both right in the end. We needed to enumerate the structure and the rights. Because they are written in the founding has made them the best defense. I completely agree that anti-federalist like George Mason were right to be suspicious, but both sides working together made the Constitution the supreme law of the land and the best way to say “no f~~~ you progressive/marxist/socialist/liberal s~~~bag, this is what was intended”.
Yes. George Mason was f~~~ing awesome and we owe a ton, but Madison was wise enough to write down his points and make them historically viable. What’s the difference between Cinncinatus and Washington? We know what Washington looked like and have a clear picture of him.
It matters. It is a GREAT document. And yes do shut up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jtCiTvQ37E if anyone is interested.
Nice vid btw!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jtCiTvQ37E if anyone is interested.
Nice vid btw!
Thanks man. And I realize my view on the constitution runs counter to most everyone. But most people see the constitution as this perfect document that was given by a celestial power or something (conservative idealism maybe?). Once I became aware of the Articles (I never learned about them in high school), I realized that there really was an alternative to the constitution, a document which gives one single person the power to veto/strike down any and every act of law produced by our representatives. We basically have Rome, complete with emperor and puppet legislature. One man should not have unlimited veto power (we see this coming to its full scope with Obummer-the-feminist using his phone and pen to not only write and strike down codified law, but also to manipulate the legislature by making the veto threat against future law and spending restrictions. Here’s the reason the “opposition party” gives for never winning: “Well, he’s going to veto any bill we pass to stop spending or restrict federal power over anything (like healthcare) so, well, just vote republican in November then we’ll show em!” We’ve all heard this right? This presidential office has complete control over the legislature. As far as I’m concerned, that gives him, not de facto, but literal and sanctioned total dictatorial power; and this power comes DIRECTLY from the federal government. We are rolling straight toward an elected monarch. Afterall, if the opposition has no way to oppose anything he does, how can we call that any kind of separation of powers?
The constitution is fundamentally flawed IMO. Yes, its the best thing since the magna carta, sure. But the Articles (strengthened in various ways) would have kept the states sovereign and in control. We wouldn’t be sending more money to the central government than we do to our state houses like we do now. Imagine if the tax rates were flipped. Imagine the states no longer required the feds to send money BACK to their states along with all welfare programs fully turned over to the states. Think our debt problem would probably be solved? Yeah, I think so.
Finally, the US under the articles would look alot like how the EU is set up. Remember when the muslim invasion was underway? Hungary put up a fence and told the Schengen Agreement to go f~~~ itself. Wouldn’t it be great if Texas could do the same thing to the federal government over immigration prosecutions? But they have to beg and plead to protect our national southern border which is ridiculous IMO. I’m no anarchist nor am I an uber super “government has no value” uper super duper libertarian. I see any move toward centralization of power to be a direct infringement on the power of the people and anybody can see what centralization has brought us 200 years later. I really see the obsession with seeing the constitution as this final perfection of law (as we constantly hear in the media) to be counterproductive to fixing the real problem: centralization. Every time we hear Washington describe a solution, we are offered a little more centralization or ALOT more centralization. As long as the constitution is held as the perfect guide to freedom and government, we will continue the process of death by a thousand paper cuts. We need to change the conversation; I’d be happy with Texas governor Abbott’s proposed amendments: The nine proposed amendments are:
· Prohibit Congress from regulating activity that occurs wholly within one State.
· Require Congress to balance its budget. (YEEEEEEEEESSSSSS!!!!!! FOR GOD SAKE PLEASE!!! If the states can do this with a f~~~ing 5-10% income tax, the feds should damn sure be able to do this with a 25-35% income tax! Of course they’d have to have an exception for war or emergencies or whatever, like say a Mars colony needs rescuing and it the middle of the FY, but this should require a simple majority vote by state legislatures.)
· Prohibit administrative agencies—and the unelected bureaucrats that staff them—from creating federal law.
· Prohibit administrative agencies—and the unelected bureaucrats that staff them—from preempting state law.
· Allow a two-thirds majority of the States to override a U.S. Supreme Court decision.
· Require a seven-justice super-majority vote for U.S. Supreme Court decisions that invalidate a democratically enacted law.
· Restore the balance of power between the federal and state governments by limiting the former to the powers expressly delegated to it in the Constitution.
· Give state officials the power to sue in federal court when federal officials overstep their bounds.
· Allow a two-thirds majority of the States to override a federal law or regulation.
Damn. Sounds like another video idea. LOL.
F!@#Guilt YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6hQIbzFPm5RBfsjm2pCGgA
“I just watched your video….Gonna have to agree to disagree with you on what it means for me to be a mgtow. You say, among other things, that men are no longer holding society together. I don’t see all this work being done by females. engineers, construction, sanitation, hard labor on oil rigs, repairing machines, maintaining machinery in automated factories, etc. So, until that day comes…which imho, will be never, I am unable to subscribe to your point of view.”
-I can see how my view might sound confusing and I will be expanding on the idea in the future. All the work you see being done (medicine, engineering etc), so much of it is corporatized and committee run. Men have no autonomy. I mean hell, they have machines to turn people over in bed in hospitals now (women don’t even need men to push a patient SIDEWAYS anymore). Imagine all men were restricted from working. What jobs could a woman literally not do now (with modern automation and technology)? Woman can do anything that requires the skills of a monkey pushing a button and damnit, that’s pretty much how most jobs are now.
-Trash men push a button and the hydraulic arm picks up the bin. We have cars that drive themselves. Miners use power tools. Put that power hammer on a stand and a woman could do it (if she was wearing a space suit with lavender smelling breathing filters of course). When I worked as a diver in the oil field, we had female divers and roughnecks out there (and no, not the huge butch bitches you might think of).
-Sure we aren’t there yet but, I guarantee, should this legislative feminism continue to expand, men will continue to be tasked with designing technology to put themselves out of work in the future…you know..for safety and equality and stuff…“I have no desire to go back to the plantation, or the rat race, nor do I have any intention of being a sperm bank or walking ATM on any level, whether it be by a female or sanctioned by ANY form of ANY govt. Nor do I have any intention to pay for sex to a gender that screams nothing but utter contempt (and that’s putting it mildly) of me being a man. As for baby farms, and men, by law (as you stated it) having to give their sperm, to keep up the population quota to continue feeding the machine so-to-speak…I refuse to be subject to that as well.”
-I’m not suggesting that a centralized scheme is a good idea for personal freedom. But if you see where we are now, we already HAVE a centralized scheme (to a lower degree than china or North Korea). If feminism continues to envelope the legislature, it will become more and more socialistic and centrally planned.
-Once MGTOW FINALLY catches up to feminist numbers, our “freedom based” government will have turned into nothing but a shell of what it once was; a centrally planned de facto dictatorship on which all citizens depend for their livelihood. Should THIS be what MGTOW inherit, I can see no other option than dictating population expansion should the voting population be composed of feminists and MGTOW oriented men (of course there are many ways to do this but, on way to eliminate any rape accusation is to make insemination completely blind).
-To see my point, you have to imagine our current government, expanded toward its logical conclusion, and then dropped smack in the middle of a population composed of nothing but feminist women and MGTOW oriented men. Ultimately, my real point is that, I don’t see society collapsing. If society never collapses and continues to be overrun and controlled by feminist rhetoric, what do we do as men? Imagine the voting population becoming a two party system: feminism vs MGTOW men. Now what? That’s what I was exploring in the vid.“Freedom is by far, always better than the illusion of freedom. Hell, it isn’t even the same freaking ballpark. Not only is it not a contender, it’s just flat out, no contest. Having rights and liberties taken away, with all the shaming & degrading & hating on us….with, what seems to be a never ending cycle of it just being more and more, as time continues to go by is just beyond being obscene & absurd…even calling it a perversion isn’t harsh enough, IMHO, on these crimes of humanity against us men. As you stated in your video, you said you see feminism continuing to grow and dominate, etc….”
-Absolutely. And what you describe here is happening en masse, and WILL continue. The question in my mind is, as our rights and freedoms decline and disappear, what do we men do about it? MGTOW isn’t, as I see it, a surrender. It is fighting back in the ONLY way a single oppressed citizen (who doesn’t desire to become a serial killer) can under a feminist oligarchy. We can’t “improve” the system. We must DOMINATE or completely change the system. My video outlines one possibility: domination. There are many ways men, once freed from the standard feminine goddess complex, can really create a government designed for independence and freedom. What we have now, expanded, will do the exact opposite.
“I don’t know if you have checked this out, but it is certainly worth the time…”
-Holy…4 hours is a long one. Is this the whole book on tape essentially? I’ll listen or…just go by the book LOL. I prefer reading. Sounds interesting though. Thanks for the reference.
-Thanks for watching and commenting on the video and this thread. I really see MGTOW as the ultimate fix for civilization. I want to see MGTOW thought spread far and wide. Only when we men reverse the accepted rhetoric (ie feminist rhetoric) will we ever reverse the future course of western civilization; and I think we can all agree the current future course is a very very bad course indeed. The more discussion there is in the public sphere, the more difficult the screeching, bitching, and whining of feminists (and well, all females alike) will be to hear. Cheers brother.F!@#Guilt YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6hQIbzFPm5RBfsjm2pCGgA
“we aren’t males. We are men. Stand up and be counted.”
You know…you have a very good point here. Transsexuals are also male. But they aren’t men. Good point.
F!@#Guilt YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6hQIbzFPm5RBfsjm2pCGgA
-Holy…4 hours is a long one. Is this the whole book on tape essentially? I’ll listen or…just go by the book LOL. I prefer reading. Sounds interesting though. Thanks for the reference.
-Thanks for watching and commenting on the video and this thread.Yeah, it’s long, lol. Thank you as well. Have really enjoyed reading the comments posted. A lot to think about, from everyone’s view and input on this whole site.
I actually listened to one of your other vids regarding purpose. I am still thinking about it, but I think you may be on to something there, with it.
Anyway, back on topic. I have also given more thought to your posts here, as well as your vid you linked.
Imagine all men were restricted from working. What jobs could a woman literally not do now (with modern automation and technology)? Woman can do anything that requires the skills of a monkey pushing a button and damnit, that’s pretty much how most jobs are now.
I think I can understand you more, after your last post, but with how much we men get taxed to death to keep the economy “somewhat” going, I can’t help but wonder how viable this scenario would be in terms of being more likely than not.
Even if all men were restricted from working, which is hard for me to fathom such a reality (assuming, it ever came to pass), but even harder still, that all taxes on us men would be dropped. I don’t see women ever accepting that kind of deal. How would men pay the taxes without any work?
Seems like utopian society for females & slave camps for men would be the only way around it. Which brings the fema camps, etc., back into my rearview mirror, so-to-speak.
Should THIS be what MGTOW inherit, I can see no other option than dictating population expansion should the voting population be composed of feminists and MGTOW oriented men (of course there are many ways to do this but, on way to eliminate any rape accusation is to make insemination completely blind).
I could and should have explained myself in more depth, in my previous post. My bad on that. I can see your point more clearly now. How would us MGTOW, in this scenario, have any way of knowing that the insemination process would not be botched? To put it bluntly for example:
Let’s say this were to ever be implemented, wouldn’t the feminazis just abort more and more males, to ensure the female voting is always the majority? So, even if it ever came to this, and we decided, or were forced, to comply, without us having any say over the procedures, etc., to me, it would just be one more way for us men to be shafted & exploited. I certainly do not see us having any rights over it, seeing that we just keep having more laws, liberties & rights stripped from us, as things are currently.
Imagine the voting population becoming a two party system: feminism vs MGTOW men. Now what? That’s what I was exploring in the vid.
So, as much as I like the idea you propose here, with the example & concern I just made, it would make this problematic, if the aforementioned scenario were to be the case, in regards to this.
Don’t get me wrong here. The thought of us men being able to get organized and grow in number enough, to bring some semblance of balance back to the sexes, by way of laws through voting power, sounds better than not ever being in that position. I just question how viable of an option, if any, at this point, it is or would ever be.
MGTOW isn’t, as I see it, a surrender. It is fighting back in the ONLY way a single oppressed citizen (who doesn’t desire to become a serial killer) can under a feminist oligarchy. We can’t “improve” the system. We must DOMINATE or completely change the system. My video outlines one possibility: domination.
Perhaps herein lies my issue, and/or possible lack of understanding. Hence why I stated previously, on what it means for ME to be a MGTOW. In short, it’s me gone fishing. I have checked out of the whole scene with the modern female & all that entails in our society, currently.
I neither see it as a surrender or even anything to fight over or for. What incentive would I need to get me to engage again? I have no idea. However, saying this against all odds, if I were to ever be enticed to help shape or mold a new reality for us men, then yes, I would want to be a part of that.
For me, this is of course complete speculation, as the title of this thread clearly states. Even if a 180 were to happen at some point in the future, regardless of how, I am very confident that it will not be anything 5-10 yrs from now.
With rape laws becoming even more f~~~ed up, manspreading, etc., I can’t help but wonder, what kind of f~~~ed up laws will hit the books in the next 10 yrs.
One of the things I do know about females. They are never satisfied, they never quit bitching, taking & wanting more, more & more. With that being said, I am afraid us men will continue to see that manifest, and undoubtedly, at our expenses, as usual.
The more discussion there is in the public sphere, the more difficult the screeching, bitching, and whining of feminists (and well, all females alike) will be to hear. Cheers brother.
Agreed, and thank you also for your comments and feedback as well. Have enjoyed reading everything that has been posted, not only in this thread, but the threads of others as well.
My apologies to those that commented, and me not responding or engaging. As the disclaimer in my op states. I am really behind on the whole politics scene, so your comments either went over my head, and/or gave me food for thought.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
