Why are most Judges such complete cucks?

Topic by Azureth

Azureth

Home Forums MGTOW Central Why are most Judges such complete cucks?

This topic contains 22 replies, has 17 voices, and was last updated by Constantine  Constantine 2 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #548747
    +7
    Azureth
    Azureth
    Participant
    255

    I mean most Judges and those in the legal system with power/influence are men. So why do these cucked pieces of s~~~ consistently screw over men and favor women by rulings and sentences and such whether it be family court, divorce, splitting assets, sentencing for a crime etc. etc. etc. It’s like these guys get a boner off of seeing other men screwed over.

    #548758
    +9
    Foolsgold
    foolsgold
    Participant
    5711

    I had a parking ticket when I was a 17 yo kid. It was in the early 80’s and the judge made sure to double the fine. I asked him why and he told me it was to teach me a lesson. I told him I would pay but the only lesson I learned is that he was a dumbass. That didn’t score too many points.

    #548762
    +2
    Wyr
    wyr
    Participant
    591

    I think they just follow the laws. So it’s the laws that are biased. But I know little about our legal system, someone else here likely knows better than me.

    Self-improvement is my religion. Sovereignty is my god.

    #548765
    +9

    Anonymous
    42

    Because they’re ivy league assholes that never lived in the real world and do as the reprobate and molested law mandates they do, and that’s to follow the law straight to the pits of hell if that what it says to do, and that’s what it says to do, no mercy, just toss us in the machinery grinding us and everything to pieces and paid handsomely to do so. A COLOSSAL DISGRACE!

    Society at large has decided that men are evil and we’re paying a heavy price for that wrongful decree. Many of us paying with our lives, many loosing our fortunes, loosing our well being. Loosing loosing loosing.

    Where are all the good men?

    They were destroyed in the Great Western Cultural Marxist Gender War, along with all the unicorns…

    #548770
    +9
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Personally, (and I admit, this only my opinion) but I would place the percentage of “cucks” / pussy pandering / blue pill / white knights / manginas at about 95%.

    . . . with maybe 5% of men having a “red-pill mindset”.

    You can also tell by reactions from women when you don’t put up with any of their crap. The majority of them react to a “no” like it’s UNTHINKABLE – as if no other man has ever told her that – or told her off when she’s being unreasonable.

    She doesn’t get her way, and now you’re a “jerk” or an “asshole” and you didn’t even have to treat her badly.

    Have you ever dated a woman who is only used to these guys? Holy s~~~. you have to undo all this conditioning. It’s exhausting.

    So I guess most judges are like that, because most western “men” are like that. Even my closest friend is a pudding around women. He sees a skirt or a cleavage and isn’t even in his right mind around women.

    I also found that guys who didn’t grow up around a sister(s) are the worst.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #548776
    +8
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    I also found that guys who didn’t grow up around a sister(s) are the worst.

    never really thought about that too much,
    but that’s true.
    my sisters let me see at a very young age how illogical females actually are.
    the stupid arguments they would have made me laugh at them.
    .
    i always wanted a biological brother !
    which is why i bond strongly with my friends.
    most of whom don’t have a brother either.
    .
    and yes,
    the judges are just living in a world of their own for the most part.
    insulated from the reality the rest of us share.

    #548789
    +4
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12053

    I think they just follow the laws. So it’s the laws that are biased. But I know little about our legal system, someone else here likely knows better than me.

    Quite the opposite: most divorce laws are SLIGHTLY biased in favor of women, the real damage is 70%-80% due judges interpretations.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #548796
    +13
    TaxGuy
    TaxGuy
    Participant

    What do you call an attorney with an IQ of 70?

    Your Honor.

    Order the good wine

    #548799
    +6
    President Camacho
    President Camacho
    Participant
    941

    Judges aren’t critical thinkers when it comes to women. They’ve got pressure to rule in the woman’s favor or to go easy on them so that’s what they do, it’s no skin off their back if men get screwed as long as they can afford that nice lake house and go fishing whenever they want (often times to avoid their aging nagging wives, ironically).

    A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

    #548809
    +6
    Ranger One
    Ranger One
    Participant
    16836

    Why did most people not care about the existence of slaves?

    Wasn’t as big an issue until John Brown went monkey-s~~~ on Harper’s Ferry. Then a couple years later Union soldiers were singing about John Brown as they marched into battle.

    The judges just haven’t met their John Brown yet. Someday, the chickens will come home to roost, for all the f~~~ers like judges that inflict their system on us.

    When that day comes, I’m going to pop some popcorn, watch and laugh. Then I will find the nearest courthouse that is a smoldering pile of ashes and urinate on the ruins.

    All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

    #548821
    +9
    BrainPilot
    BrainPilot
    Participant
    7640

    I suspect judges take money from men and give it to women because they know deep down that when women run out of money, they are going to go looking for government to support them. The government is 20 trillion on debt and the judges are hoping the paychecks they are getting from that same government don’t bounce one day. If I was a judge and I had to give some cupcake her man’s money, or my boss’s money, I’m gonna make sure I drain the man before I let her sponge off my boss. I’ll tell myself “at least the man got to screw her a few times…” :-/

    Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

    #548833
    +6

    Anonymous
    54

    White Night manginas like most men.

    #548860
    +4
    Blade
    blade
    Participant

    I think they just follow the laws.

    Not in family court they are untouchable . There is no consequences for perjury .

    My mistake was writing a letter of complaint to the ombudsmen . The complaint was sent to the judge . It was game over from there .

    I have alot to prove my story but family court is untouchable and the tentacles run very deep . Its all in house and anything else a goverment department wants to change will also be served there .

    All in house

    THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

    #548872
    +6

    Anonymous
    42

    Not in family court they are untouchable . There is no consequences for perjury .

    My mistake was writing a letter of complaint to the ombudsmen . The complaint was sent to the judge . It was game over from there .

    I have alot to prove my story but family court is untouchable and the tentacles run very deep . Its all in house and anything else a goverment department wants to change will also be served there .

    All in house

    Hey Blade, would you push them off a ski lift onto the rocks below in a white-out snow squall? I would, just point him out to me and I’ll lift the safety bar and give him a good hard shove! I’ll try for head first, if I fail, please forgive me.

    #548911
    +5
    Ranger One
    Ranger One
    Participant
    16836

    I suspect the reason why judges act like they are God is for the same reason Xerces did in the movie “300”. They never have their power checked, they believe in their own superiority, and they never get a reality check like the spear in the cheek that Leonidas threw at Xerces.

    All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

    #548944
    +2
    IRuleMe
    IRuleMe
    Participant

    Judges are cucks. They’re mostly married themselves, so they cave to their wimmen all the time. I’ve had to go before a judge a couple of times. Wanted to punch the prick when I was done.

    #548952
    +3
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Prefer Peace to Piece
    Participant
    10809

    The United States represents 5 percent of the world’s population and 66 percent of the world’s lawyers.

    Lawyers donate to the Democratic Party over the Republican Party at 4-to-1 rates.

    97 percent of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democratic Party.

    From the Dailyherald.com, “Who and what is the Democratic Party?
    Simple, it is the party of lawyers. Think for a minute what all these politicians have in common: Barack Obama, Michelle Obama, Hillary and Bill Clinton, John Edwards, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. They are all lawyers.

    In contrast, in the Republican party George W. Bush and Dick Cheney were businessmen, Newt Gingrich a history professor, John Boehner a plastic manufacturer, former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon.

    The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work who are often the target of lawyers.”

    The majority of judges are liberal. The majority of judges are Democratic.

    #548971
    +5
    BrainPilot
    BrainPilot
    Participant
    7640

    Agreed Prefer Peace…
    I think yours is the more specific post of my more cynical one. (Follow the money)

    A few weeks ago, someone here posted a recommendation for the movie ‘Divorce Corp’ that did pretty good job of illustrating how corrupt the family courts and the legal industry that surrounds it has become. There’s an awful lot wrong that is explained by that documentary, but the thing I came away from that movie that was most eye opening for me was the interchangeability of the participants.

    Particularly the part that described how a judge on the bench one day making rulings one day, and the very next day going to work at jobs in the law firms that were arguing cases in his court the day before. Lawyers don’t need to bribe a judge when they already have his signed employment contract in their pocket months or years ahead of the end of his term on the bench. And it isn’t that the judge is being bribed to rule in such a way to help one side win (unfairly) over the other. It’s that the judge is ruling so drag out the process for as long as possible in order to maximize legal fees to his future employers.

    I have always been cynical enough to believe that once two parties are locked in to expensive litigation, the lawyers have little incentive to end it before the money runs out. But I always perceived the process to be two lawyers arguing before a third party (judge) about which way something was going to go. The documentary did a pretty good job of explaining that there is no third party. There is just a collection of lawyers who all take turns being the plaintiff attorney, defendant attorney, and judge. The positions change but the players don’t. Each of the three of them know what to do at each step along the way to maximize their own take from the process.

    The 2 lawyers know what arguments to make and the 3rd lawyer (when it’s his turn to be the judge) knows what ruling to make to maximize the profits to everyone involved. All that money comes from the higher earning party. It has to because of the 5 people involved, the man is usually the only one bringing money to the table, both lawyers, the judge and the cupcake are there to take money from the table.

    Judge makes sure that cupcake gets a share of the cash because if cupcakes don’t get a nice fat share, future cupcakes won’t continue to file 70% of the divorces. Judges award cupcakes the cash and prizes to help insure the future business continues to roll in.

    Deep down, I doubt any of them gives a damn about which side wins, as long as they drag it out enough to run up the maximum possible legal fees in the process.

    Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

    #548975
    +3

    Anonymous
    18

    Divorce Corp did a good job showing family court is a circus.

    More kangaroos dressed in black are found in a US family court than Australia.

    #548980
    +2
    Ranger One
    Ranger One
    Participant
    16836

    This “legal” system disgusts me so much, that if I overheard a plan by terrorists to blow up a bunch of courthouses, I wouldn’t say a goddamn thing to anyone, even if I would get a reward for thwarting it.

    A pox on them. Worthless, corrupt, vile, bone-marrow-sucking parasites that deserve worse than death. If I had the power of the Q, like in Star Trek, I’d kill a thousand of them in painful ways, then resurrect them from the dead and kill them all again in a different painful way, and so on, until I finally got bored with watching them die.

    All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 23 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.