Why?

[Anonymous 0]

Why should any man, who is much more emotionally, financially, and psychologically self-contained, risk total and absolute destruction of himself and any children he gives a feminist when he can have a full and fun life without the heartaches and impoverishment feminism brings men, women, and children?

Feminism is the ultimate female movement for dependence and entitlement.

Feminist policy goals are to make someone else, a man, the government, society, anybody, responsible for their discontent and desired lifestyle level.

Feminist avoid responsibility by blaming men for the feminists’ own bad decisions. Accountability only counts for men according to them!

Feminists are so angry at men because when the feminist demands for ultimate and totally unaccountable female relationship and financial power became too heavy a trade-off, the men walked. Slaves aren’t supposed to be able to walk, so they must be punished and demeaned. Women have been peripheral in men’s lives.

Men have never needed a woman ‘to complete’ them, or we would not have adventurers, sailors, or early world trade caravans. We would still be sitting in the savannah waiting for some predator to come and eat our slower members, the very young, elderly, or pregnant women. As women demand evermore enslavement of men, politically, culturally, socially, legally, emotionally and financially, men, as men in the ghettos have done, walk.

What sane man will build permanent ties with a woman who espouses man-hate, man-abuse, and man-enslavement?

When feminists become mothers and do not appreciate the gifts men bring, every thing the man does will cause the feminist to be angry no matter how supportive or enriching the man’s acts are towards the feminist.. As with any Narcissistic woman, she will be angry if the children get too much attention, the birthday gift was less than $10,000, not buy her the newest SUV or if he asks her to cut back on her twice a week day spa. The woman retaliates with divorce that forces wage slavery and punitive measures on a man who gave his all for giving his all. This will show him, it will destroy his career, create a tragic prognosis for the children’s adulthoods, and impoverish all. But, by God she showed him how mighty she is. Now, in a divorce, the courts will state that he must provide for the family and his ex as if he were still receiving all of the benefits of his marriage plus pay her attorneys who stole from the family as a whole, plus carry another home, plus pay for ‘visits’ with his own children, plus, plus, plus….. Just this one factor will drive many of the more intelligent and capable single young men away from marriage, commitment, and family.

Why should any man honor a woman with a lifelong commitment of support when she demeans him and his gender as well as the many gifts he brings? Feminists are such spoiled little children who have long ago lost all appreciation of others.

Men are not STUCK in pre-adulthood, we choose it because there aren’t any desirable American women. They’ve been bred to abuse all men.

[TheSpiceParticipant 2644]

Amen to that!

"I've been thinking about what it would be like if we got back together."
"You know it's too late for that."

[Anonymous 42]

Agreed, MGTOW is a fire escape on a burning building! We didn’t light the fire nor should we perish in the flames!

Not our BBQ!

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

We all suspect that if a particular woman could arrange her life exactly as she would most prefer it to be, she would screw chad, get pregnant and force some beta wallet pay for her and HER kid. Women will universally deny this when they speak of it. But when they ACT: they screw chads from about 15 to 30 years old, then get married to the beta wallet and pump out a kid or two. Maybe it’s beta’s kid. Maybe it’s chad’s kid. It doesn’t make much difference really. Either way, they have a hostage and someone is going to pay her.

Wether she says with beta or not, he’s paying the ransom. If she stays, he pays her directly. If she decides she didn’t get enough of chad in her 20’s, she can bail and the government will still force beta to pay her.

If she miscalculates and ends up having chad’s kid, it’s much harder to get beta to marry her, and often impossible to get any cash from chad. But no problem. Since she can get the government to force beta to pay taxes, she can go on welfare and beta still ends up paying her.

Either way, the government will make sure she gets paid money earned by a man. But one way pays much more than the other.

Marriage is just the formality she has to go through in order to get the divorce jackpot and collect the maximum from the wealthiest man willing to have unprotected sex with her. Once she has the hostage from the wealthiest man, she has successfully max’d out, and can go back to banging as many chads as will have her.

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[xanthineParticipant 4903]

The thing most women cannot even contemplate, is that there is a better alternative to them. It’s called, keeping your money and freedom. Instead of giving it to her, you keep it all for yourself and spend it however you wish. It is so much better that they cannot even begin to compete, yet they are so convinced they have the market cornered they do asbolutely nothing to be pleasant or enticing for men. They don’t believe they have to act feminine, be healthy and fit, or have any domestic skills. They can drink, do drugs, get tattoos, be promiscuous, have babies out of wedlock, and go deep into debt with a worthless degree and lots of trips to “find herself” f~~~ing chads abroad and none of that matters. They all believe they will still have an army of simps for life. Until they hit the wall, that is…

[ConstantineParticipant 4417]

Hear hear, Blood_King. The goal of feminism is make rules that only apply whenever they feel like it.

When my friend went to see Black Panther the other night (SPOILERS COMING UP, READ NO FURTHER IF YOU DON’T WANT TO KNOW), he said that a group of girls who sat next to him were gushing about how, finally, every female character in the movie was a strong-assed, bad-ass bitch.

But apparently there’s a scene where Martin Freeman’s character still takes a bullet for Panther’s love. Because no matter how strong a woman is, a man should always put himself in front of a fire that’s aimed at her.

By the way, I didn’t even realise that Black Panther was male up until that night. And I’m a comic book freak. D’you know why? Because Imdb had paid so much attention to the female characters, I assumed that that’s what Panther was.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

I didn’t go see the movie, and I probably wont. But it doesn’t surprise me about the behavior of those women in the theater. They’ve become much more emboldened with the idea that they are all bad asses now due to the artificially imposed rules of the ‘gender war’.

And I have become much more emboldened with the idea that I will be bailing off to another quieter country when I’m done making money in this one.

Every country that has embraced feminism has seen its divorce rate sky rocket and its birthrate plummet. The real debate on immigration (that no one ever talks about) is the decision politicians face: how many immigrants are necessary to maintain the population in sufficient numbers to make the interest payments on the debt the government has run up.

It’s an idea that will be extinct soon…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Anonymous 42]

BrainPilot wrote:

Every country that has embraced feminism has seen its divorce rate sky rocket and its birthrate plummet.

BP, that’s only the tip of the iceberg, these same societies have become Police States where the government is the new head of the family and men are the children of that form of family!

I REBUKE EVERY BIT OF IT AND CAST IT INTO THE LAKE OF FIRE WHERE IT BELONGS!

You’ve heard; “you’ve come a long way baby”?

My answer; “burn baby burn”!

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

Brain Pilot wrote:And I have become much more emboldened with the idea that I will be bailing off to another quieter country when I’m done making money in this one.

Not a bad idea at all.

I created my own political jurisdiction and became
A refugee there. Like MGtower I am a foreigner in my
own lawless uncivilized society.

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[Author]

Posts