Where have all the good women gone?

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

Women didn’t change; society changed. Male and female nature have been the same for the entire existence of our species, but societies change based on environments.

In a subsistence economy, women are far too dependent on men to treat them badly. If you nag your husband or cheat on him, he kicks you out and you starve. But once society changes to an abundance economy, though women still depend on men as a whole, they do not depend on individual men, because big daddy government takes care of them in place of the father/husband. Feminism is just the inevitable expression of female nature that is not constrained by law or necessity.

This.

All the rest is tradcon bulls~~~ and blue pill nostalgia for something that didn’t exist.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[sjt1975Participant 2536]

Eric Lauder wrote:

This thread is a shame. Pure tradcon bulls~~~, with a lot of blue pill nostalgia for a mythical past that, actually, was quite different from blue pilled dreams. Just my two cents.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Not everybody is at your level of acceptance, Eric. Whilst there is a lot of Blue Pill content and reflection in this thread, it is obvious that the content of this thread has lead to the exposure of the Blue Pill World, and so allows for the Red Pill to be taken.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

sjt1975 wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

This thread is a shame. Pure tradcon bulls~~~, with a lot of blue pill nostalgia for a mythical past that, actually, was quite different from blue pilled dreams. Just my two cents.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions. Not everybody is at your level of acceptance, Eric. Whilst there is a lot of Blue Pill content and reflection in this thread, it is obvious that the content of this thread has lead to the exposure of the Blue Pill World, and so allows for the Red Pill to be taken.

The old society was exactly what allowed actual situation: they gave to women the right to vote without asking them to perform military service, while men were forced to do it.

They didn’t even had the b~~~~ to ask women to perform a civil service to get the vote: they simply gave it to women without asking them to take some responsibilites.

This was Day 1, and they were doomed since Day 1.

Those men were morons.
Those “good women” didn’t have dignity or purity: they were bitches taking the right to vote without even proposing to perform a civil service in support of the elders, the soldiers, the disabled.
That was in 1920 in USA: so much for the “good women”.
They were the same bitches who few years before shamed the men to die with white featers.
Ungrateful hypocritical c~~~s, totally lacking dignity.

Then, later, it was proved that the “good women” of the 60’s didn’t really love their male children: by asking, and then cheering at, “no-fault divorce” those “good women” throwed their male children under to bus to favor someone else’s daughters. No fault divorce was signed first in California in 1969, and was campaigned through the whole 60’s.

Someone need further proofs?

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[sjt1975Participant 2536]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Someone need further proofs?

No, we (and I) don’t need further proofs. We just need more men to realise the truth, so that they can decide to Go Their Own Way.

I’m English and I think Feminism begun to get a strangle-hold over in England about 10 years or so after America, as England is only slightly behind America, culturally speaking.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

sjt1975 wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Someone need further proofs?

No, we (and I) don’t need further proofs. We just need more men to realise the truth, so that they can decide to Go Their Own Way.

I’m English and I think Feminism begun to get a strangle-hold over in England about 10 years or so after America, as England is only slightly behind America, culturally speaking.

UK have the most misandrist courts, they’re f~~~ing clowns, especially male judges, the epitome of manginas.
When it comes to courts it’s actually much worse than both USA and Sweden, just to say to, the only courts that are even worse than a regular court in UK are a kangaroo court in American campuses and, naturally, Spanish special courts for domestic violence.

Feminism is just women’s nature brought into politics, it’s around since at least 150 years, not 10. And “SCUM Manifesto”, the true feminist manifesto, is around since 1967: 50 years.
What we have yet to establish is if being mangina/blue pill is men’s nature: I hope it isn’t because if it would be so then I think that there’s a good chance that human males are going to disappear from this planet within 100 years.
Proofs are against us: the “strong men” who fought WW1 were too weak to ask women to take some responsibilities while they gave them the right to vote.

I’m not against women’s right to vote.
I just think that every person should be in such situation:
* To earn the right to vote you have to do military or civil service.
* Everybody have the right to vote, no need of military or civil service.

That’s not how it worked: it was and it still is, option 1 for men and option 2 for women, since day 1.
Even everywhere the draft is suspended or abolished, there’s still the fact that in case of war just only men will be called.
And yet most ministries of defense in Europe are women.
See? I’m not citing PM, prime ministers have a lot of different responsibilities: I’m citing precisely ministers of defense.

Dedicated to the “good women” of 1967, who already had vote without draft and “tender years doctrine” giving them the children after a divorce, and who successfully fought for no fault divorce (and got it in 1969), from a 1967 book, expressing the love and the empathy of “good women” of 1967:

Life in this society being, at best, an utter bore and no aspect of society being at all relevant to women, there remains to civic-minded, responsible, thrill-seeking females only to overthrow the government, eliminate the money system, institute complete automation and destroy the male sex.

It is now technically feasible to reproduce without the aid of males (or, for that matter, females) and to produce only females. We must begin immediately to do so. Retaining the male has not even the dubious purpose of reproduction. The male is a biological accident: the Y (male) gene is an incomplete X (female) gene, that is, it has an incomplete set of chromosomes. In other words, the male is an incomplete female, a walking abortion, aborted at the gene stage. To be male is to be deficient, emotionally limited; maleness is a deficiency disease and males are emotional cripples.

The male is completely egocentric, trapped inside himself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, or love, friendship, affection of tenderness. He is a completely isolated unit, incapable of rapport with anyone. His responses are entirely visceral, not cerebral; his intelligence is a mere tool in the services of his drives and needs; he is incapable of mental passion, mental interaction; he can’t relate to anything other than his own physical sensations. He is a half-dead, unresponsive lump, incapable of giving or receiving pleasure or happiness; consequently, he is at best an utter bore, an inoffensive blob, since only those capable of absorption in others can be charming. He is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, he is capable of a large array of negative feelings — hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt — and moreover, he is aware of what he is and what he isn’t.

Although completely physical, the male is unfit even for stud service. Even assuming mechanical proficiency, which few men have, he is, first of all, incapable of zestfully, lustfully, tearing off a piece, but instead is eaten up with guilt, shame, fear and insecurity, feelings rooted in male nature, which the most enlightened training can only minimize; second, the physical feeling he attains is next to nothing; and third, he is not empathizing with his partner, but is obsessed with how he’s doing, turning in an A performance, doing a good plumbing job. To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he’s a machine, a walking dildo. It’s often said that men use women. Use them for what? Surely not pleasure.

So much for the “good women” of 1967.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[sjt1975Participant 2536]

Eric Lauder wrote:

The UK has the most misandrist Courts.

I agree; the British legal/judicial system is a complete joke, as it currently stands. The Courts are terrible, but Tribunals are even more of a joke than The Courts. There is so much ingrained hatred/distrust of men, both in the law and with legal decision-makers, that there is no true justice for men anymore. This is another reason why men must turn away from co-habiting/marrying with women; even having sex with a woman is ultimately risky nowadays. The best thing that a man could do is to just stay clear of women altogether, if he could.

[Anonymous 1]

Eric Lauder wrote:

That was in 1920 in USA: so much for the “good women”.

Yeah, Woodrow Wilson and the Socialists pushed hard for women to get the vote. This is because women will always vote the way they are told to vote. Women are emotional thinkers so mass advertising is really targeted at women.

Women will vote based on, who has the best Propaganda. They are not capable of making a rational logical decision. This was the only way to control the free thinking western men by destroying our voting power. Now the majority of voters are women. The free thinking man can no longer control democratic government and that is why Socialism has become the dominant force in our Country. Feminism and Women’s Suffrage was just a tool to implement Socialism here in America and undermine the American Man’s Sovereignty.

[ghostParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Women will vote based on, who has the best Propaganda. They are not capable of making a rational logical decision. This was the only way to control the free thinking western men by destroying our voting power. Now the majority of voters are women. The free thinking man can no longer control democratic government and that is why Socialism has become the dominant force in our Country. Feminism and Women’s Suffrage was just a tool to implement Socialism here in America and undermine the American Man’s Sovereignty.

Where do we go from here?

[Anonymous 1]

ghost wrote:

Where do we go from here?

[ghostParticipant]

touché @Heavicidal

[Anonymous 3]

Arthur Schopenhauer wrote “On Women” in 1851.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

I still see people from the WW2 generation on a daily basis. In my opinion, these people are different. They espouse different values.
I honestly don’t know what has caused society to change so much. I remember reading about the rise and the fall of the Roman Empire. I think we are following the same path as Ancient Rome. We have the rise of the wellfair state, the currency debasement, and the corrupt politicians for starters.

[ghostParticipant]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

I think we are following the same path as Ancient Rome.

Agreed. This has been mentioned several times.

is our only real solution as smart, independent men.

[Anonymous 3]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

I still see people from the WW2 generation on a daily basis. In my opinion, these people are different. They espouse different values.
I honestly don’t know what has caused society to change so much. I remember reading about the rise and the fall of the Roman Empire. I think we are following the same path as Ancient Rome. We have the rise of the wellfair state, the currency debasement, and the corrupt politicians for starters.

Not just Rome, the same thing that happened to Babylon, Sparta, Greece, the Arabs and the Ottomans.

Feminism has destroyed every civilization it arose in. The West is nothing new, it will fall. Such is the way of the world.

America will end up just as a footnote in history. 200 years from now, only historians will ever discuss it. It is really just a blip compared to all the other empires through history. I don’t know the fate of China and India, but they also had ancient empires. Wouldn’t surprise me if both also got gutted the same way.

I don’t think any Democratic Republic has lasted long. Pretty much all the history I know is Emperors and Monarchs.

[goodkid43Spectator 550]

Autolite wrote:

jd anderson2010 wrote:

My grandpas generation, the greatest generation, fought WW2, then came home and had children. Women back then took great pride in their purity.

I read that it was quite common for the women ‘back home’ working in the defense plants to sideline as prostitutes. I guess we must have different sources…

I call this bulls~~~. Site some sources on this. No doubt that this happened. But it was UNCOMMON.

God bless, Michael

[goodkid43Spectator 550]

NomadicExpat wrote:

In every aspect of human interaction, I see the Baby Boomer generation as the spoiled, bratty “have my cake and eat it too” generation that permanently poisoned the well for the following generations.

.

As a baby boomer myself, I frequently state that the baby boom generation is the most blessed, the most fortunate generation in human history. No major wars, no devastating diseases, no invasions of foreign entities, access to unprecedented health care, abundance of food beyond imagination and material wealth for the common man that was literally unimaginable less than 100 years ago.

As a boomer, I sense an obligation to create enough wealth for my daughter and others because they may not have what I have had. I have been blessed beyond what I deserve. I despise that sticker that states, “We are spending our children’s inheritance”.

Having said that, Women are made in the Image of God and are capable of being Holy even though they are weaker than men. Modern, secular atheism which undermined Christianity which emphasizes the fundamental importance of family for a stable society is the fundamental reason for women becoming bad. Even the pagan Emperor during Jesus’ time outlawed orgies to Bacchus because it was destroying his empire.

No fear of God, leads to no fear who you f~~~ (which includes the destruction of good husbands)

God bless, Michael

[Author]

Posts