Gentleman, let me pose a enticing question.
What if the undesirable actions of citizens stems from alienation from civic pride?
The notion has been applied to the general populous, but not women at least as so far, the last few centuries. (if memory serves correct)
My Hypothesis is, this standard of behavior is culled from the nurturing of being outside of ones own nation. This has been spoken about before. But I don’t think its ever been applied to women. In fact, I don’t think its ever been expected at all.
We say that women do not have any skin in the game per say for their own biological imperatives. That is well known. A copy is just as well as another copy. However, it stands to reason that our crumbling of our civility towards one another is a product of not responsibility, but self alienation from voluntary means.
The introspection still sounds a bit daft, till we understand the relationship between the two conjectures. Meaning, we have been blindsided to the painting of events that lay before us.
While the behavior witnessed by the female in question appears before us to be quickly written off as a tantrum. A tantrum requires the outburst to serve the purpose of accommodation to bequeath on the the woman in this case, Chicken nuggets.
This falls out of the realm of the typical scope of female behavior to acquire what it deems the desirable outcome. In this case its access to a good or service.
Taking into account variables such as her SMV, or Social status; In tandem with the psychological aspects such as we see here the height of the window. The relative innocuous nature of the Intercom muting her perceived importance of female machismo, it seems what we are seeing time and time again is the product of alienation of role as a female in this transaction. I.E., As a woman, she is unable to leverage her gynocentric preference that our society has deemed acceptable nature of females. E.G. , in a manner she has been able to do with normal face to face interactions.
Outbursts of this nature are not exclusively relegated to just females. Typically, lewd or unruly traits exhibit themselves manifested in a deeply rooted desire for the acceptance of visual communication cues; Imparting significant emphasis to their chosen method of communication with others. For males, physical attributes imparting physical presence, stature of wealth through display of fragments of their personality emphasis non verbal and visual cues of communication.
Males who can not use their desired physical communication traits and stature to attain the desired outcomes, don’t suffer from the same unless they experience a discontent from their surroundings.
Think of it as a person who cares of the environment. There is no doubt they are passionate. This passion comes from being not at odds with the earth and its environment. However, they only focus now on themselves. (instead of the earth) and now they disregard all others around them that do not have the same unity that is exhibited in their own values.
1. People no longer see value in other people.
2. People see the world around them as an appliance or a throw away single use item.
This could change if indeed the drive thru was imparted with qualities that made them feel like this was in fact their own.
I wonder if the large reason would be more that these people seem to be portraying traits of being treated with “Equality”.
Oh dear.. That may be the Canary in the coal mine.
You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home
sidecar 1 month, 2 weeks ago.
