What is your 'type'?

[VictorParticipant 124]

I’m wondering if I’m the only one who has this take on women.  On the rare occasion I’ve discussed women with other men, I’ve tended to find that these men find certain types of women attractive that I wouldn’t go for.

I don’t like women who ‘try’ too hard: heavy make-up, flirty clothing, showing off breasts and so on.  I also don’t like blondes particularly.  Obviously they are good-looking (though I’ve also noticed they age poorly and from about 25 onwards can look ugly when not made-up), but I think it’s possible for a woman to be ‘too good-looking’, either because she tries too hard or because her looks just make her seem bland.  But I just don’t really find blondes attractive on the whole (there are exceptions).  Another thing is that I dislike it when women get themselves a fake tan.  I find that very off-putting, but I’ve noticed that most other men seem to like that.  I also hate seeing tattoos on women – I find it very unsexy.

I prefer averageish-looking women who have natural sexiness/beauty and a thin figure, with dark or red hair, pale skin and small breasts.  I especially like women who have physical or emotional idiosyncracies – a facial characteristic that is unusual and that men generally might find unattractive, or an unusual personality quirk.  I also prefer women who have some level of intellect.

I think this is based on one of the major crushes of my teens, which was for a girl who had short dark hair, small breasts, thin and was fairly intellectual.  I worked alongside her one summer on an archaeological site for some months and we talked a lot and she found me funny.  Her quirk, that I liked, was that she giggled a lot.  I can still hear that giggle now.  I eventually worked up the courage to communicate my feelings to her in an indirect sort of way that made things obvious, and she seemed upset by it and didn’t speak to me again – which didn’t help my confidence.  I suppose I’ve roughly applied that template ever since in implicitly ‘screening’ women, and that might be part of my problem – looking for an ideal that might not exist.

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

If you are a MGHOW then having an ideal when it comes to women doesn’t matter.

I don’t think they exist anyway.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Soldier-Medic wrote:

If you are a MGHOW then having an ideal when it comes to women doesn’t matter. I don’t think they exist anyway.

 

Bingo.  I don’t have a type.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[WolfParticipant 890]

I like the “strong and independent” type….so all women are my type.

On a more serious note, I don’t really have a type. If she’s fit with a nice ass and smile, I’m attracted. In order to hang around with her she needs to be somewhat sane. That’s all I need for some short term dating and fun. As for long term, I’m not looking for that.

[Anonymous 12]

I’m similar to Victor. I like the girl next door type, someone who looks approachable, little make up, when I was in a strip club recently I was more interested in the barmaid she was easily the best looking woman in the room and probably had the better body too.

That said I don’t have an exact type. She could be blonde, brunette, red head, slim, a little curvy, big boobs, small, I’m fairly open with that, I go on a case by case basis. I once got into an argument with a woman because she didn’t believe me when I told her I don’t have a type. I don’t as my preferred type is more intrinsic and complicated than just big boobs, blonde hair tight butt for example.

 

 

[FermatParticipant 3478]

Categorizing women is similar to the act of categorizing m&ms.  different color.  Same thing on the inside.  Having types is an exercise in futility.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[VictorParticipant 124]

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t as my preferred type is more intrinsic and complicated than just big boobs, blonde hair tight butt for example.

I think this about sums it up.  The ‘type’ I hold to is a combination of qualities and difficult to define.  I just know it when I see it.

[QcummerParticipant 652]

I like type ‘new’.

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

My requirements are brainy and well-educated, plus good character.  The rest is negotiable.  If any of those three are missing, we don’t have a deal.  End of story.

 

[Anonymous 5]

I definitely don’t like the cheap plastic (welded vinyl). They only last two or three good f~~~ings.
I go for the mid range un-welded polyurethane/latex models with a solid heavy construct vagina.
High end silicone women are a bit out of my range considering I appreciate variety.
For those of you who still have the desire for the security and stability of long term relationships, I think the silicone models are the way to go.

[Helen be DamnedParticipant 480]

Animatronic.

"You can keep your soul, I don't want a cell-mate." - Them Crooked Vultures

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Easy going, average looks, healthy and not take herself that seriously.

She must be able to change a wheel on 4×4 in the desert not sit there looking dumb. She can’t do that …. she’s gone. ☺

[Anonymous 2]

I used to have a “type”.

Then I met a woman who was my type and a total goddamn bitch. She broke my heart.

Then I met a woman who was not my type but a pretty good lay. She fixed it.

So f~~~ types. I now consider “type” to be the total sum of fenotypical characteristics in a women. That is not a factor that should govern anything ELSE but raw physical attraction.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

“Type” – I can much more easibly get on board with this type of language, than I can with other verbage on the manosphere… Just my idiocancy.

There are severel elements to “types”. Physical, peronality, and spiritual/moral values.

I used to think I had a “type” physically. That would be dark hair and eyes, sexy skin, and a certain allure about her.

Now, with age? I desire a NATURAL woman. Give me natural, young, perky breasts with doe eyes and no pretenses, slinky legs and a small waist, and Ill be happy. Does that exist? Doubt it. Rare if it does. Bit THAT would be my type. Oh ya, coupled with an innocent childish nature thats nourishing. Ok. NOW I know Im dreaming lol.

Resident cynic.

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

I do have a weak spot for gingers without makeup. Luckily they don’t come around too often and the rest of the female population I don’t really care about.

[Author]

Posts