Many men are either timid and pathetic or have self-obsessed-misogynistic-man-whore syndrome. We would rather be alone than be with a men like these, no matter how much they have to offer us materially. We will not allow lesser men into our hearts or beds.

My question is: Can there be such a thing as WGTOW?
And by the way, behold the bitch behind it! (or could be a random image)

Read more here: WGTOW/about

EDIT: Added a link.

IDIOTS

Nuff said 😆

P.S. Went to the link ILive provided and noticed they needed allies. Off to a roaring start, eh? HAHAHAHAHAHA

PROs

• They define feminism as “Corporate, hypocritical, brainwashing, ignorant, anti-academic, and in many cases, annoying.”
• They don’t want to be accepted for jobs, scholarships, school placements, programs, or projects simply for being women. They want to earn everything they get.
• Their personal note.

CONs

• Their tag line for WGTOW is “Why should men have all the fun?” which somehow indicates that they’re doing it just for the sake of “we want a similar thing for women too”.
• Their “All or Nothing” philosophy which I defined in my first post.
• They want to redefine feminism. To quote them, “I think we all know that feminism as an idea and concept can mean so much more than it does right now! Let’s change the discussion and focus on what we as women can positively do to make a better world!” which could be an insidious agenda to repackage feminism and sell it as something different.
• They “don’t want men to dominate them, necessarily ;-)” I can feel the double standard bulls~~~.
• They “don’t want to police men, tell them how to speak or how to think” as if policing men is their birthright and they are doing everyone a favor by refusing to police men.
• Their object is “To create a stronger language bond between females. This site is made by women for women! Nothing typed will be said in acknowledgement of male readers; the equal and opposite of MGTOW spaces.” which again feels like they’re just imitating us.

All in all, 3 PROs vs 5 6 CONs. Still, let the discussion begin.

EDIT: Added a CON.

The Blog, Links, and Misc are under construction as we wait for feedback, responses, and allies!

-wgtow.com

Because God forbid a woman have to build something on her own.

Nuff said.

😛

Based on what I’ve seen from WGTOW, they are striving to redefine feminism. That’s not GTOW. It’s a movement. Perhaps they have a reading comprehension problem. If they successfully repackage feminism, it will be called feminism 4.0, and I want no part of it.

The Blog, Links, and Misc are under construction as we wait for feedback, responses, and allies! -wgtow.com

Because God forbid a woman have to build something on her own. Nuff said.

Anyone who is looking for allies doesn’t understand the TOW part.  Allies are for those who are war against another group, and you need them to partner with you to defeat an enemy, and there will be compromising.  Allies?  Really?

Many men are either timid and pathetic or have self-obsessed-misogynistic-man-whore syndrome. We would rather be alone than be with a men like these, no matter how much they have to offer us materially. We will not allow lesser men into our hearts or beds.

If this is a claim of independence, there won’t be many women behind the movement. This means work and a job! A woman may be capable of claiming to be a WGTOW perhaps, but women, will NEVER have this mentality aside from in very small numbers. Why work when you can con a man into doing it for you? A woman’s logic is always going to land on having the man do the work because most of today’s societies justify it and endorse it. There’s no real reason for a woman to go their own way unless they are the anomaly amongst the very extremely large majority.

I don’t see anything wrong with any of it really. I mean I could pick it apart for sure, but I’m only saying I don’t see anything wrong with it to the effect that if they want to try and form a band and gather reinforcements, they are more than welcome. I won’t stop them. I’ll casually observe and see what comes of it. See if any of them can actually maintain their claims without being hypocrites in the process (I think I could expose some hypocrisy and predict even more just with the little bit we have here). We already know we can support our reasons over here.

And I notice they made it very clear what they DON’T want in a man, but made no mention of what they do want in a man. I didn’t notice any clear distinction being made that they are swearing off men altogether based on the criteria they present, or if they are saying what they don’t want, and are holding out for their white knight of unknown criteria?

They’ll obviously need to further define their standards and hash some things out if they want their actual stance and worldview to be defined in a clearly understood manner.

As MGTOW it’s not that difficult. We are refusing to engage with females based on individual experience and observation, and we are each fully and readily capable of giving the reasons as to why this is.

Their overall ideology doesn’t seem quite so simple since we don’t know if they just don’t want to engage with men, or if this is the typical female “white knight” bulls~~~ where they are holding out for “the one”.

So, that’s my two cents since Vats wanted this to be a real discussion.

“I never said I wanted that! I want this!” She said.

So, these women may well believe what they are saying today. Tomorrow, who knows? I’ll bet even they don’t.

the equal and opposite of MGTOW spaces.

In other words: Wahh wahh wahh – I wanna pway tooo – wahh wahh wahh wahh wahh

F~~~ing imbeciles.