Watch what he say before judging him

[It’sallbsParticipant]

X11 wrote:

Dude it’s common sense. The guy talks bogus s~~~ for money so f~~~ what he says.

If I have a dentist tell me that he believes tooth decay is caused by demons and my chakras are out of alugnment then f~~~ if I will let him near my teeth.

It’s called the fallacy of not being an idiot fallacy.

They tell you a deadly poison used by teh nazis in teh camps is good fo r your teeth so they can make money form edorsing toothpast on tv ads…

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[X11Spectator 4520]

Sure dude.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

X11 wrote:

Nah I’m fine, admit you are gullible.

Why do you care, remember this is not reality according to you.

But how do you know if I’m being gullible (and I said earlier I don’t agree with all he says nor all conspiracies) you never watched either of the videos.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

X11 wrote:

Dude it’s common sense. The guy talks bogus s~~~ for money so f~~~ what he says.

Appeal to Common Sense Fallacy

Description: Asserting that your conclusion or facts are just “common sense” when, in fact, they are not. We must ARGUE as to why we believe something is common sense if there is any doubt that the belief is not common, rather than just asserting that it is. This is a more specific version of alleged certainty.

Logical Form:

It’s common sense that X is true.
Therefore, X is true.

Applied here: Its common sense, the guy talks s~~~ for money. Therefore his arguments about the Las Vegas shooting can be ignored.

He may, on this occasion only, be talking the truth, he may not. But you came to your conclusion without seeing what he had to say. That’s not objective thinking, or logical.

It’s called the fallacy of not being an idiot fallacy.

That’s not a logical fallacy, that’s you talking without thinking critically or logically, but emotionally.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Cu you watse your breath unfortunately x11 is an immature kid who comes on here for teh sole purpose of aclling anyone who doesnt want to nuke everywhere a bluee pill or a tuna.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[X11Spectator 4520]

You argue all you want to support icke, that’s on you.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

X11 with regards to Cu’ slat post why do you think Hitler burned the books?

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[X11Spectator 4520]

It’sallbs wrote:

Cu you watse your breath unfortunately x11 is an immature kid who comes on here for teh sole purpose of aclling anyone who doesnt want to nuke everywhere a bluee pill or a tuna.

Pretty much nobody on this forum agrees with your crazy conspiracies ever.

Your buddy cu is not even agreeing with, he called icke an idiot and said he might be right or wrong.

I bet cu has not watched the clip either. Nobody else on this thread has yet.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

X11 wrote:

You argue all you want to support icke, that’s on you.

Either you have short memeory, acnt read or are an immature bafoon who wont admit when he is wrong.

Read my earlier posts I am not supporting anyone and don’t agree withe everything icke said.

I knew you and others would attack without watching the video that was the whole point.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[It’sallbsParticipant]

X11 wrote:

Pretty much nobody on this forum agrees with your crazy conspiracies ever.

Your buddy cu is not even agreeing with, he called icke an idiot and said he might be right or wrong.

I bet cu has not watched the clip either. Nobody else on this thread has yet.

He is agreeing with me 100% he saw what my point was. The video is spot on not all icke says is but that wasnt the point CU spotted that.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[X11Spectator 4520]

It’sallbs wrote:

Read my earlier posts I am not supporting anyone and don’t agree withe everything icke said.

I knew you and others would attack without watching the video that was the whole point.

Ah, you were just trolling, nice work.

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

X11 wrote:

Cú Chulainn wrote:

Which fallacy would that be??

You’re talking gibberish at this point.

You can suck icke’s dick for all I care, NFG.

The guy is a fraud, nuff said.

But hey I respect your right to believe he is the godhead.

Abusive Ad hominem fallacy and insults. Also irrelevancies to the matter at hand, I can suck Icke’s organ and believe he’s a godhead. Can’t recall alluding to either on this thread.

All I need now is the threat to knock me out in under ten seconds from someone thousands of miles away online, then I’ll be fully rewarded with your intellectual offerings.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

X11 wrote:

Pretty much nobody on this forum agrees with your crazy conspiracies ever.

Again you prove another of my points about you correct.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

X11 wrote:

You argue all you want to support icke, that’s on you.

Straw man fallacy. At no point did I support Icke’s views. You have posted a caricature of my position, a straw man easily torn apart – avoiding the true position I actually posited.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

I think that comment might have been aimed at myself but your point remains correct either way Cu. How he thinks your my buddy when I have never even engaged with you on a thread before is beyond me.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[X11Spectator 4520]

Cú Chulainn wrote:

You have posted a caricature of my position,

The one point I agree with you on.

I can’t take all the credit, your position was a caricature of itself from the get go.

[X11Spectator 4520]

Cú Chulainn wrote:

At no point did I support Icke’s views.

Quoted for truth.

that about wraps it up.

Thanks for the chat, that was easy.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

He didn’t support Icke’s views. Cu said in the video Icke said we should question everything and be sceptical even of what he himself says.

You have continually dismissed others views without reading their views.

You have made the very childish mistake of dismissing someone as never having any valid points because they have said some daft stuff as well.

When it was obvious you were losing the argument you then made threats to knock people out, you made some childish comment about how no one on this forum agrees with me (pppppppfffffffftt no one likes you.

You then say even my buddy chu doesnt really agree with me-i never even conversed with him so he isnt my buddy.

The only bafoon here X11 is you and anyone with a logical fair midn whether they agree with my views or whether they like or dislike me of Cu will reach the same conclusion.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant 4222]

In the mid 90s I was trippin on LSD at a bush party.
Was sitting there and some partiers started to morph into dinosaur looking things.

Like their legs turned all scaly, then it moved up thier body as they just talked and laughed. They truly looked like dinosaurs.

Was waaaay gone on acid.

Years later when I first discovered Icke I was like hmmmmmmmm.

Just sayin. Don’t do (too much) LSD.

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

Pretty much nobody on this forum agrees with your crazy conspiracies ever.

Appeal to popularity fallacy.

Description: Using the popularity of a premise or proposition as evidence for its truthfulness. This is a fallacy which is very difficult to spot because our “common sense” tells us that if something is popular, it must be good/true/valid,but this is not always so.

Logical Form:

Everybody is doing X. Therefore, X must be the right thing to do.

Here: Nearly everybody agrees that your conspiracy theories are wrong. Therefore they are wrong.

Just because an idea is popular doesn’t make it valid. Also, how do you know everyone agrees with you, did you make a poll and everyone voted?

Your buddy cu is not even agreeing with, he called icke an idiot and said he might be right or wrong.

I never called Icke an idiot, this is a false claim.

I bet cu has not watched the clip either.

How did you come to this conclusion? I watched the full video, I find Icke entertaining.

Nobody else on this thread has yet.

Again, how can you possibly know this?

[Author]

Posts