Washington Post spins "non-report" about Sex Robots

Topic by

Home Forums Computers, Games and Technology Washington Post spins "non-report" about Sex Robots

This topic contains 17 replies, has 15 voices, and was last updated by Bloody Heartland  Bloody Heartland 1 year, 7 months ago.

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #820597
    +7

    Anonymous
    1

    In predictable fashion, the Washington Post took the very PC, pro-female stance implying sex robots are a bad thing. They had nothing to report, from a report that had nothing to report, but used the headline:

    “New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is healthy.”

    WHAT?

    The article goes on waxing idiotic with female “researchers” reporting “no evidence” opinion like it is some method of science.

    “Kathleen Richardson, an ethics professor at De Montfort University in Leicester, England, grew so concerned about the intrusion of machines into human relationships — an area “traditionally off-limits to the market” — that she launched the Campaign Against Sex Robots in 2015.”

    “It offends me that they think a human woman is like a machine,” she said.

    WaPo could have gone with many headlines…like:

    “Nothing to report about sex robots, but we will anyway.”

    “So-called female researchers frightened that female SMV will plummet due to sex robots.”

    “Female academicians make pathetic attempt to disparage sex robot trend.”

    and the obvious

    “New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is UNhealthy.”

    At least many of the comments that follow the article demonstrate that there are male thinkers out there who see the pro’s of robots over the con’s of human women. There is a glimmer of hope.

    LinkTo ArticleHere

    #820602
    +3
    Carnage
    Carnage
    Participant
    22113

    dildo.

    To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

    #820610
    +6
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    “New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is healthy.”

    I saw the “Solo – A Star Wars Failure” movie (just last night)…. and remembered Disney plugging the concept that “Lando is pansexual” before the film opened. What a joke.

    He’s actually “in love” with a goddam droid and cries when she “dies”.
    First thing I thought of was a sexbot.

    Even in the film, they paint in this chemistry between them and the female droid fully implied copulation would actually “work”!! It was spoken out loud and verbally.

    It offends me that they think a human woman is like a machine,” she said.

    It’s the other way around.

    They call them “sexbots” and some of the new ones even do dishes!
    But really…. it’s just a dishwasher you can screw.

    So while Kathleen Richardson is offended™ about the idea that a woman is like a machine…. no no no, sweetheart… if a man-made machine can actually replace a woman, well NOW you have reason to be “offended”.

    “New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is UNhealthy.”

    Plenty of reports out there can tell you sex with women is unhealthy.
    Christ, even commenting on it can land you in jail.

    They brought it upon themselves.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #820613
    +6
    FrostByte
    FrostByte
    Participant
    19005

    Who cares what woman think. She will mock and degrade for no other reason that it’s her nature to do so. If you like the doll you’re perv if you don’t like it you’re busy exploiting woman. Can’t win. So why bother asking a woman’s opinion on male issues. I don’t ask my dog how to do my taxes.

    So while Kathleen Richardson is offended™

    TM lol I just saw that.

    If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

    #820624
    +10
    Xanthine
    xanthine
    Participant
    4903

    They thought this day would never come. But now that prototypes are being built, we are seeing more and more articles like this. The one thing these articles have in common is a comments section filled with men who are p~~~ed off, tired of all the hate and bulls~~~, tired of the low quality women, and tired of living in a society that demonizes men for being men.

    This is the logical conclusion, and it is exactly what they asked for. Men will finally stop objectifying women, talking to them, trying to have sex with them, or really wanting anything to do with them at all. Men will simply buy one of these bots and forget about women forever. Women will be safe from any sexual interests or advances from men, forever. Finally. That should make them happy. I can’t wait to see it…and to own my own harem of sex bots, of course.

    #820627
    +6
    NerdTunneler
    NerdTunneler
    Participant

    Why are they afraid of an appliance? They are not afraid of a washing machine or a toaster or a vacuum cleaner…Is it because sex is their only bargaining chip and their tool of control over men?…So much for the empowered women…

    I stand with feet apart and let my balls hang free...Manginas dont have balls...See how they stand and sit at the whim of their masters...

    #820630
    +6
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Participant
    22507

    In predictable fashion, the Washington Post took the very PC, pro-female stance implying sex robots are a bad thing. They had nothing to report, from a report that had nothing to report, but used the headline:

    “New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is healthy.”

    WHAT?

    The article goes on waxing idiotic with female “researchers” reporting “no evidence” opinion like it is some method of science.

    “Kathleen Richardson, an ethics professor at De Montfort University in Leicester, England, grew so concerned about the intrusion of machines into human relationships — an area “traditionally off-limits to the market” — that she launched the Campaign Against Sex Robots in 2015.”

    “It offends me that they think a human woman is like a machine,” she said.

    WaPo could have gone with many headlines…like:

    “Nothing to report about sex robots, but we will anyway.”

    “So-called female researchers frightened that female SMV will plummet due to sex robots.”

    “Female academicians make pathetic attempt to disparage sex robot trend.”

    and the obvious

    “New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is UNhealthy.”

    At least many of the comments that follow the article demonstrate that there are male thinkers out there who see the pro’s of robots over the con’s of human women. There is a glimmer of hope.

    LinkTo ArticleHere

    She doesnt seem to be offended that women replace an entire man with a vibrator or giant dildo. Or bedpost. Or stick shift knob. Or bottle. Or baseball bat. Or their fist. Or a big dog they own. Or a cucumber. Shampoo bottle. Beer can. I dont have to go on anymore even though there is plenty more they shove up there replacing a man.

    Nope only guys taking care of themselves with a un piece of equipment bothers women. Not their huge cache of crap they use.

    Female hypocrisy knows no bounds.

    Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

    #820634
    +7
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    She doesnt seem to be offended that women replace an entire man with a vibrator or giant dildo.

    Not “entirely”. They still want his wallet.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #820644
    +3
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22521

    I saw the “Solo – A Star Wars Failure” movie (just last night)…. and remembered Disney plugging the concept that “Lando is pansexual” before the film opened. What a joke.

    Ouch.

    Honestly, for new movies, Avengers Infinity War is a solid sci-fi epic that tabled politics and just went for straight action. Like Star Wars use to be before SJWs took control.

    In addition, Deadpool 2 is good for lampooning SJW ideals, wonderful laughs, and emotional scenes.

    Also, if you have not seen the series. Check out Cobra Kai. It is an awesome sequel series to the Karate Kid franchise.

    As for the Wash Post. I am surprised they made such a article considering sex robots might become a major seller for Amazon in the future.

    #820651
    +5
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    Honestly, for new movies, Avengers Infinity War is a solid sci-fi epic that tabled politics and just went for straight action. Like Star Wars use to be before SJWs took control.

    Heard that. Historical opening too. And called it when Social media exploded with that SJW / Lando crap – Disney trying to have an even bigger opening – but I knew it would bite the bag. Sure enough, ABYSMAL box office take in the second week.

    Seeing a movie on a Monday night is awesome.
    Damn near the only one there.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #820680
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22521

    Honestly, for new movies, Avengers Infinity War is a solid sci-fi epic that tabled politics and just went for straight action. Like Star Wars use to be before SJWs took control.

    Heard that. Historical opening too. And called it when Social media exploded with that SJW / Lando crap – Disney trying to have an even bigger opening – but I knew it would bite the bag. Sure enough, ABYSMAL box office take in the second week.

    Seeing a movie on a Monday night is awesome.
    Damn near the only one there.

    I could care less about SJWars films. I am more interested in Deadpool 2.

    Given Deadpool 2 was put between Avengers and Star Wars, Deadpool 2 gaining $600 million is a good haul for that R Rated movie.

    #820723
    +2
    Hmskl'd
    hmskl’d
    Participant
    6406

    “It offends me that they think a human woman is like a machine,” she said.

    .. not to worry .. Professor Richardson, my future bot will not be patterned after a human woman ..

    I’m currently toying with the idea of either a Vulcan with pointy ears, an Andorian with antennae

    .. or more than likely just a plain old DS9 Dabo Girl.

    No human finalists that made the cut or in the running for my new Bot .. so never fear and rest your mind .. I won’t be having a Bot designed after any AWALT. I simply find the alien forms more pleasant, honest and therefore desirable ‘creatures’ to have around the old homestead.

    #820748
    +1
    Experienced
    experienced
    Participant

    Sex bots “bother” THE LAYDEEZ, because they exemplify the reality of men replacing the laydeez’ presence.
    It’s as though laydeez no longer have any socially redeeming value whatsoever.
    At some point, even the best mechanic will say, “It’s not worth it, too wrecked, replace the whole thing.

    "It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

    #820757
    +2
    Ranger One
    Ranger One
    Participant
    16836

    I wouldn’t use that filthy rag Washington Post to wipe my ass after suffering a case of norovirus.

    Funny that little invention called “dildos” that women have used for thousands of years doesn’t objectify men.

    Couldn’t imagine the “family” courts would ever objectify men as wallets.

    LOL.

    Article must have been written by stupid c~~~s for stupid retards that can’t see through their thin layer of bulls~~~ like I do.

    All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

    #820772
    +1

    Anonymous
    12

    Even if it wasn’t healthy, so what, why would I care/not use one?

    Sounds like women are feeling threatened.

    #820855
    +1
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    New report finds no evidence that having sex with robots is healthy

    Here is some evidence by virtue of being dolls, they do not allow for the person to person transfer to disease. Making them useful in limiting sexual partners during the era of evolving stds such as hiv.
    Myth busted!

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #821277
    +1
    KevinStyles
    KevinStyles
    Participant
    2580

    How can it NOT be healthy? If you’re not having sex, you’re getting some which is healthy. As long as you’re not sharing, there’s no chance of STDs which is…. healthy. And there’s none of the traditional mental stress of maintaining a relationship with a woman which less stress is again…. healthy. Plus all the money you’ll save so if you need medications for something you can actually afford them keeping you ….. healthy.

    I see absolutely no down side for MEN ditching women for sexbots. All the negatives are from the womans side, if they can’t control sex they have no power.

    #821720
    Bloody Heartland
    Bloody Heartland
    Participant
    693

    It’s only when women feel threatened that they “care” about men’s health. What a joke. If these ever get more sophisticated than a mannequin, I’ll have to start offending women all the time.

    "I have the fury of my own momentum." "With this ring I thee wed. Fire walk with me."

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.