US opens new $11 billion base in South Korea

[Anonymous 6]

http://www.nola.com/military/index.ssf/2017/07/us_opens_new_11_billion_base_i.html

____________________

Now this is sure interesting. I wonder what will come of it. I don’t think our guys will be on the front lines but South Korea and Japan should be the first people in line. And our special forces should back them up.

What do you guys think??

[Anonymous 42]

Use the DPRK for Minute man nuclear target practice, 5 minutes and it’ll all be over, no more Korean problem, gone, just a big hole…

[Anonymous 18]

I think US will design missile that Japan will buy for $4.25 million.

Then Japan will proceed to bomb and kill its civilian population.

US will attack North Korea.

WWIII might ensue.

The globalist powers will move a step closer to their wet-dream of ownership of planet earth.

Kim Jong-un’s hair stylist seems like the same guy who trimmed Osama’s beard.

Paid by CIA.

[Anonymous 14]

Uh, better idea, how about we stop f~~~ing with people and use this money for something else?

NK isn’t gonna do jack s~~~.

What do I think? I think there are thumb sucking scared of the dark Neo-Cons all around me. Maybe even a few founding members of the PNAC.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

NK isn’t gonna do jack s~~~.

I think the real concern is perhaps while f~~~ing around playing ‘Star Wars’ NK is going to f~~~ up one of these times and one of their toy rockets is going to accidentally miss the ocean…

[Anonymous 14]

Autolite wrote:

I think the real concern is perhaps while f~~~ing around playing ‘Star Wars’ NK is going to f~~~ up one of these times and one of their toy rockets is going to accidentally miss the ocean…

So, we should invade or assassinate or maybe start a nuclear war because they are testing missiles that haven’t killed anyone? S~~~, U.S. has killed 2 million in the last 15 years, based on LIES, and many were women, children, and non combatants due to accidents, so let’s not pretend that human lives have anything to do with any of this. Gaddafi kept his agreement to not get nukes, look at what happened to him. All wise countries not on board with Western Neo-Con Globalist policies should be doing what NK is doing, I applaud them, they are just saying “Don’t Tread On Me”.

Logic in Neo-Con logic? None. Just bulls~~~ting their way into war after war… Don’t listen to me though, things have been getting better and better for everyone obviously due to these policies in the last 15 years…

PNAC Globalists like William Kristol are popping bottles of champagne daily, and all you Neo-Con types are just the useful idiots of the Right.

[ghostParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Uh, better idea, how about we stop f~~~ing with people and use this money for something else?

NK isn’t gonna do jack s~~~.

What do I think? I think there are thumb sucking scared of the dark Neo-Cons all around me. Maybe even a few founding members of the PNAC.

I agree – we waste way too much money on this s~~~. Trump is nothing but a blue pill mangina in my eyes. He is a f~~~ head loser like the rest of the people in Washington.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

So, we should invade or assassinate

I get the impression that you say “assassinate” like it’s a bad thing…

[AttonParticipant]

If you’re going to do with North Korea go until an unconditional surrender.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 14]

Autolite wrote:

I get the impression that you say “assassinate” like it’s a bad thing…

lol It is when it is unwarranted, and it certainly is when those who have nukes say that any attempts at regime change, and they will use them.

Once again, until NK attacks anyone I see no reason to do anything, and they are not going to attack anyone, therefore do we really want to start a war?

At least wait until a decent false flag is staged to get it started… And none of this s~~~ like Venom posted before where Trump “Notified Congress that he launched missiles into Syria due to “reports” of Assad using chemical weapons” s~~~…

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Anonymous wrote:

So, we should invade or assassinate or maybe start a nuclear war because they are testing missiles that haven’t killed anyone

Joe is right lets wait until the North Koreans vaporize Seattle or San Francisco THEN we might do something.

[Anonymous 14]

PistolPete wrote:

Joe is right lets wait until the North Koreans vaporize Seattle or San Francisco THEN we might do something.

Oh my god, so many closet Neo-Cons here…

Uh, are you guys all thumbsuckers? Afraid of the boogeyman? Do you all sleep with a nightlight? Mommy tuck you all in at night still?

Sorry, if you go around killing every dude in the neighborhood who tries to get a gun so he wont be killed by you, who is the bad guy in this scenario? The paranoid mass murderer, or the people trying to get guns to defend themselves from the paranoid mass murderer?

U.S. has proven we will f~~~ whoever we want in the ass as long as they do not have nukes. Find the Gaddafi video on Youtube for evidence, Bowie Knife style, complete with Hillary Clinton laughing about it… He kept his agreement and did not get nukes, look how well that worked out for him…We have INCENTIVIZED other countries to race for nukes with out behavior.

So, some of you are saying go in now? What if they do have a nuke that could reach the West Coast? Who’s fault is it if they launch it because we invade? They would be acting in self-defense…

Pete, for a man who likes the right to bear arms and self defense, you sure seem to be able to only apply the logic in the micro sense, not macro.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Not to be a stick in the mud but the fact is that the US and North Korea are technically still “at” war. Now I don’t see them as a threat even with their missiles. I was just pulling your leg above. North Korea has a GNP roughly equivalent to West Virginia. War ultimately comes down to two things “will” and production. North Korea has neither. And I wouldn’t shed any tears over the loss of Seattle anyway–its a hub of latte-sucking mangina simp lefty kooks.

[AutoliteParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

And I wouldn’t shed any tears over the loss of Seattle anyway–its a hub of latte-sucking mangina simp lefty kooks.

I’d be more worried about Seattle being nuked by Montana than NK. They’ve been stockpiling ICBMs for decade now and I just don’t trust them. Montana could wipe out the whole state of Washington and not even have to worry about any retaliatory strikes…

[Joey AlfioParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

Joe is right lets wait until the North Koreans vaporize Seattle or San Francisco THEN we might do something.

Come on Pete you don’t really believe their junk is of any threat to us do you? Look at Russia and China they are way ahead of NK but even they have engineering problems and obstacles that do not match Western standards so I’m not going to lose sleep over NK engineering. Remember, the weakest dog barks the most and that’s all NK can do is just bark every once in a while to safeguard its criminal, mafia like state.

I have no doubt that our ABM’s are more than enough to handle NK. If anything, SK is capable of handling NK on its own as their first strike capability will wipe out most of their military assets.

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

[Author]

Posts