U.S. Women's Soccer does not understand basic economics

[Masculine_ManParticipant 2735]

U.S. women’s soccer think they deserve equal pay because once every couple years they draw a crowd. They recruited the efforts of Lesbian tennis icon Billie Jean King who defeated an over the hill, old man (Bobby Riggs), while she was still in her prime in the 1970s battle of the sexes. Check out the video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x9GqWoy6__s

Here’s fact, once every two years people watch women’s soccer. The rest of the time, no one watches women’s soccer. NO ONE. So when you fill the stands on a regular basis, and your star players sell their jerseys like cocaine in Florida in the 1980s, then you can ask for more money. Don’t believe me? A woman agrees with me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KfDynQFUHys

In the video above, feminists believe the answer is just to increase coverage on women’s sports, and be more enthusiastic. So in other words, force feed this s~~~ to the public until the public takes it. This is delusional and these social scientists need their heads examined. They want men and women to be treated the same, and paid the same however they need to be on separate teams. Logical fallacy? The factual feminist actually calls on coed teams. If this was the case, a woman would never make it.

If it costs you your peace of mind, then it is too expensive.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

That’s because US women do not understand simple economics. This is what happens when you give women the right to vote. They demand their version of equality [which translates to preferential treatment].

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Here is how economics work. If those doing the playing can full of the stands then they will get a bigger paycheck.

This does not mean showing more skin, but more skill.

Don’t just play to win, play to entertain the crowd. That is the whole point. Do a Harlem Globetrotter style soccer game. With more skills in use of the ball. That will help up the attendance.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

We’ve talked about this topic a few times before, but I think the biggest point they miss is this:

In EVERY men’s sport, they have walked out and demanded more pay. Basketball, baseball, football, and hockey in the US have ALL missed a part of a season at least once to force the owners to pay better.

If these women were smart they would just wait until the plane was taking off for Rio and then not get on the plane. Then make their demands. And be willing to sit out the Olympics if that’s what it takes.

The MEN in every other sport sacrificed part of their season and pay to ensure the future generations were paid “more fairly” than they were.

If they want to fight this issue, then put on your big girl panties and fight for yourself. Because, you know, strong and independent and that other stuff…………… Men have already showed you what to do, you just have to get off your ass and, well, sit on your ass.

Women, can’t even do nothing right.

Order the good wine

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Faust For Science wrote:

Here is how economics work. If those doing the playing can full of the stands then they will get a bigger paycheck.

This does not mean showing more skin, but more skill.

So true. The major players of the USWNT, have decided to pose nude in their search for popularity. Amy Waumbach and Hope Solo have both posed nude in ESPN’s body issue with white trash Solo going full frontal. Alex Morgan was full frontal nude in Sports illustrated Swimsuit Issue with only a skimpy bikini painted on (paint ain’t clothes). I support U.S sports teams but I cannot root for this bunch of sluts.
Funny they are not happy with their salaries when they haul in a ton of money with their porn photo shoots.

[narwhalParticipant]

I honestly don’t have too much issue with what they are doing. It’s not really different then what men do in similar situations. There big issue is they just don’t have the leverage men do.

As pointed out, women’s soccer doesn’t pull in as much revenue. In soccer, the disparity may not be quite as big, but it most certainly there.

Both men and women will leverage public opinion to their side. This actually for better for women because of our feminist state. For men, it tends to just look like crying babies.

As far as walking out, the women have very little leverage here. Sitting out is a double edge sword, as it hurts you as well as the owner. You get no pay at all and customers lose interest in your product. The NBA, NFL gets away with it occasionally, but they know they must get their s~~~ together or the whole boat sinks. But can you imagine if the women boycotted the Olympics? That’s 4 years without having a major national tv event. They could very well be a blow women’s soccer can’t recover from.

Ok. Then do it.

[TuneoutParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

Here is how economics work. If those doing the playing can full of the stands then they will get a bigger paycheck.

This does not mean showing more skin, but more skill.

Don’t just play to win, play to entertain the crowd. That is the whole point. Do a Harlem Globetrotter style soccer game. With more skills in use of the ball. That will help up the attendance.

LOL,thats why I can’t take women’s beach volleyball seriously!

TaxGuy wrote:

We’ve talked about this topic a few times before, but I think the biggest point they miss is this:

In EVERY men’s sport, they have walked out and demanded more pay. Basketball, baseball, football, and hockey in the US have ALL missed a part of a season at least once to force the owners to pay better.

If these women were smart they would just wait until the plane was taking off for Rio and then not get on the plane. Then make their demands. And be willing to sit out the Olympics if that’s what it takes.

The MEN in every other sport sacrificed part of their season and pay to ensure the future generations were paid “more fairly” than they were.

If they want to fight this issue, then put on your big girl panties and fight for yourself. Because, you know, strong and independent and that other stuff…………… Men have already showed you what to do, you just have to get off your ass and, well, sit on your ass.

Women, can’t even do nothing right.

People cared when the already overpaid (IMO) male crybabies went on strike,however I don’t believe the same would work for the women.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[TaxGuyParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

But can you imagine if the women boycotted the Olympics? That’s 4 years without having a major national tv event. They could very well be a blow women’s soccer can’t recover from.

Then I guess they aren’t really underpaid. The only way to find out is to boycott.

I guess the end game is that they most likely aren’t underpaid and if they show their hand they’re f~~~ed. So, like a whiney little bitch they will just p~~~ and moan about it until the SJW’s and mangina’s fix their problem. Which is exactly what they are doing.

Order the good wine

[Anonymous 24]

Masculine_Man wrote:

They recruited the efforts of Lesbian tennis icon Billie Jean King who defeated an over the hill, old man (Bobby Riggs), while she was still in her prime in the 1970s battle of the sexes.

It was rigged, there are tons of articles about it all over the web.

[BigDParticipant 3024]

There’s an all women’s fighting league. They fight in the nude, and the winner gets to ravish the loser with a strap on. It’s all staged, but there’s more of an audience for that than most women’s sports.

Maybe if the winners got to dominate the losers with strap ons, more people would watch women’s soccer.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[RyshParticipant 134]

Women’s Soccer has a Paralympics flair.

[Author]

Posts