Truth within a hand's reach

[RigParticipant 52]

When I encounter an idea or philosophy i always try to challenge it. Also for MGTOW. I was exposing myself to a lot of YT content for about a month, registered here and started to verify the “truth of the red pill”.
Started to look for some women chats on FB, listening to them, asking some questions and even went to “how to be single” movie (sic!). Everything was to try viewing those thing in the red pill light.

Luckily it came by itself. On a forum about gentleman etiquette (not rubbish one with half naked chicks, man in suit, good watches, sports car and all in black and white… none of that s~~~. Young historian is interested in early 20th century gentlemen. Some good content there.) I saw a random lady asking her question. She registered only for that purpose.
She wrote that she have a problem with her man. She is a 43y old single mother of a grown son and the “man” is in “similar position”. They’ve been meeting for 5 years and she “don’t want to much and don’t want to press him”. But, what she fail to explain, was the problem that she had. All I could understand was that he was referring to her by her name and not “honey” stuff.
What she didn’t fail to say was that she was banging him a lot (with imagination) and that he have a lot of money (now questioned due to some problems in job). And that was TOTALLY IRRELEVANT to the whole thing…

Or was it?

She mentioned that he might “fall in love again in someone else” and she wants “something more after 5 years”.
And as I read that the “red pill truth” just blinded me. It was like the sun… directly into my eyes…

Imagine the situation… you are facing some real enigma, good riddle. It is just too difficult, you got all the clues but you miss the connection. And then someone comes and give you a hint. Thanks to it you are able to solve the puzzle. You see the solution and the answer. You are sooooo happy that you made it and soooo unhappy cause the answer is s~~~. It’s the other side of “red pill truth”, “the red pill pain”. I felt that when I saw it. And truly understood it.
The worst part is that she is totally unaware of that, she don’t know that she is hypergamic. She don’t know that it’s all about the money. It was totally subconscious. The rationalization hamster has taken care of that. She “love” him, and she “need” his personality… but not without the money.

And what is the most important, she need him to feel secure, for the rest of her life, without trying too much.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

Right on brother. She could care less about the guy. What she really wants is the security and easy life that comes with the guys money. She can write a long bleeding heart soliloquy if she wanted to; about how she loves the guy; wants to be called sweetheart; wants more than a five year relationship; and on and on. But it all boils down to the fact that she really wants the easy life that comes with the guys money.

Bingo. So now you see. Now you understand.

Your English ain’t that good brother, but you got the drift. All women are desperate to get a guy hooked. Without him she ain’t gonna’ get the life she dreams of and was told she is entitled to. Few, if any, woman get out of high school or university, get a job or start a business, or launch a career, assemble a down payment on a house, and start an investment or retirement fund. No that’s the job of the guy. No they get a dead end job, rent an apartment, start buying cloths, make-up, and breasts implants, make travel plans, hit the clubs with her girl friends ride the c~~~ carousel, bleed orbiters of their money. Her best bet at getting the life she’s dreamt of is by getting her hooks into a sucker, keeping him there, locking him down with marriage, because commitment is not enough. His only out is going to cost him a fortune.

Why is it so f~~~ing hard to get the message out, especially to the 18 to 20 year old guys.

[Author]

Posts