Home › Forums › Political Corner › Trump: Guest workers are ok, if you have strong borders
This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by
Sky-O 1 year, 9 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
According to Trump, the unemployment situation is so good, American can afford to take in more guest workers.
This is per Breitbart:
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/04/28/donald-trump-to-farmers-were-going-to-let-in-migrant-guest-workers/“For the farmers, OK, it’s going to get good, and we’re going to let your guest workers come in, because we’re going to have strong borders, but we have to have your workers come in,” the president said during his campaign rally in Washington, Michigan on Saturday.
Trump said that the unemployment numbers were so good that it was possible to allow guest workers in the country to work the fields and do seasonal labor.
“We have to let people come in. They’re going to be guest workers, they’re going to come in, they’re going to work on your farms, we’re going to have the H-2Bs come in, we’re going to have a lot of things happening,” Trump said.
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
Good article and post. Thank you.
I would not put much on what Trump says on Twitter or MSM unless it is on White House paper with his seal on it. Perhaps not even then.
Production costs from smaller farms are such that employing more low-cost workers appears the only way farmers can overcome their labour issues. These are usually bona-fide immigrants
http://www.latimes.com/projects/la-fi-farms-immigration/
On the other hand there is a case to unionising farm workers so that more Americans will come back to the farms.
http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/immigration/349445-the-us-can-grow-its-own-farm-workers
It is not about having it so good as Trump suggests. The simple truth is many farms cannot afford that much higher salaries plus the other requirements like 401(K). However it is unlikely without these changes for workers the farms in general will attract non-immigrant American labour.
The implication from Trump is that currently most low-paid farm workers are illegals. This claim is refuted in this following article which presents data that illegal immigrants comprise about 26% of all type of workers in farming and this is only 4% of the total illegal immigrants employed in the US workforce. .
https://www.nationalreview.com/2016/09/illegal-immigration-american-farming-economic-myths-debunked/
Immigrants – legal or otherwise – do not want to work on farms if there are other better opportunities elsewhere. This is a structural problem in the economy.
It is very possible without low-cost labour some farms will go bankrupt – until finally the labour situation stabilises. This is the favoured approach by previous administrations that may put more farmers out of a job. In tandem farm imports will increase to make up the demand shortfall caused by loss of US farm production.
This case is similar to those affected by the tariffs imposed on steel and aluminum, whee companies depending on foreign supplies of the base materials will have to raise prices and compete against non-American companies with lower overall costs – even with tariffs added on. Again this will lead to loss of jobs and production plus increase of imports to compensate.
There does not seem to be a coherent policy on trade including immigration. Robert Lighthizer is a tariff man and during the Reagan years his tariffs against Japanese carmakers worked for other reasons. Now he is using the same tariff playbook against China and the EU.
In conclusion there seems to be little to suggest a positive correlation between strong borders and a significant increase in farm production. The labour problems in farming are structural. In my view this is just another tool to drum up support for The Wall.
I am interested to see how this progresses. Thanks again.
‘It’s going to be fabulous. . . .very amazing and it’s going to happen bigly. The workers, working hard. . . . and it’s going to be huge. Guest workers. Working’
LOL
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
