Tripple decker oven of governmental matrimony…

[Anonymous 42]

Now that gay marriage is “official” here in the U.S., the divorce, legal, and judicial systems are poised to enlarge in epic proportions, vastly draining this already defective and fragile economy. Upon June 27, 2015, The U.S. Superior Court has mandated that the single door oven of marriage be enlarged by adding two more doors, making it three in total,

Door#1: Woman and “Man” (making the man mud at this point to be molded by the woman)

Door#2: Man and Man, (I can’t believe I writing this stuff) New Man/Man Divorce courts and subsequent divorce lawyers.

Door#3: Woman and Woman (again, I can’t believe I writing this stuff) New Woman/Woman Divorce courts and subsequent divorce lawyers.

Here’s where it gets tricky, now that we have a Governmental triple decker industrial oven for marriage; what happens when it’s a group wedding where multiple partners of different sexes want to form a corporation, uniting them in one large happy family of an orgy nature? Who goes where? will they expand the oven to include endless dinominations? or do they consolidate and invest in napalm to replace the oven, so as to streamline the government (of course).

What are your opinions on gay marriage, and the “implications” (as you see it) that it places on the legal system and society in general? Not that you give a damn, I know I sure don’t, these days I conciser any form of governmental matrimony as a toxic venture to explore the depths of misery…

Here is the only place one can ask such perplexing question and get an array of answers greater than a rainbow……Your comments are very much appreciated…

[BeerParticipant 11832]

My thoughts on gay marriage is jokes on them, who wants marriage at all?  I’ve come to realize years ago the institution of marriage is nowhere near what it was for my grandparents generation…divorce rates have skyrocketed, the whole concept of marrying a virgin is non-existent as most women I come in contact with have run their dick count up to disgusting numbers, and vows of til death do you part are meaningless.  Marriage for me these days is nothing but a bad business deal…if gay people are that desperate to make bad business deals just why stop em?  I’m just glad that this is one topic in the political world that will hopefully take a back seat now so we can start to focus on real issues that effect everybody and not less than 1% of the population.  Perhaps we can work on our budget deficit/debt now so we don’t end up the next Greece, or make some changes to the healthcare system that actually lower costs of care and not just spread insurance prices around.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Next up: marriage to animals and children.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[BeerParticipant 11832]

I’d marry my dog.  I’d get to file my taxes as married and end up in a lower bracket, plus I’d make sure she had some puppies so I could claim them all as dependents.  There would be no risk of divorce as dogs are actually loyal.

I’m already supporting her and cohabitating with her.  It would just be a sexless marriage like a lot of human to human marriages end up anyhow.  Actually it would be an open marriage…she’d have to get it from a dog have some puppies for me to claim as dependents, so if I had a mistress on the side it would be ok.

I started off typing that as a joke…but about 30 seconds into it I realized marrying a dog actually seems like a better decision than marrying a woman.

[MOWsince95Participant 1446]

1. Govt has no business in marriage, gay or straight.
2. If gay marriage further burdens the illegitimate judicial system known as family court, it’s irrelevant, as I choose not to partake in and be subject to that system – only people stupid enough to marry are subject to it.
3. Group marriage, inter-species marriage, marry a pine cone, I don’t care. Participants suffer the consequences, and I enjoy the s~~~-show.

I truly don’t give a molecule of a s~~~ about the ramifications of expanded marriage to society or the judiciary.  Both of those can collapse and I would not care, as they both deserve to. I do give a s~~~ about SCOTUS rulings in the past couple days that pervert and abuse the illusion of supreme court legitimacy by vastly and unconstitutionally expanding the role of the courts (and also bureaucrats) to rewrite legislation on a whim, or to bequeath “rights” on high by alluding to a founding document that does not give them or the federal govt the authority to do so.

Scalia said it perfectly in this zinger … “Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is ‘established by the State.’”  If that doesn’t scare the f~~~ out of people I don’t know what will. It literally means that judges can interpret things to mean the verbatim opposite of what they say, and soon this will extend to contracts, agreements, you name it, because if that can be done with the actual, unambiguous word of law then nothing is safe. And these assholes have the unlimited power of violence to enforce their whimsical decrees or desires.

 

If you are MGTOW when you are young you have no heart.
If you're not MGTOW when you are 20 you have no brain.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Gay marriages mean the moral decay of society is going down hill pretty fast. Married gays will be the norm and the the tradional family will be the minority. Gays are the true bigots like the feminists. The gay society and feminists actually work together to destroy the nuclear family. This will result in further population reduction and also the elite will be over take us because we are constantly at war against each other.

It is not acceptable to allow gay marriages, I am totally against it because marriages involves god and the bible doesn’t not agree with gay marriages. I don’t hate gays it is just that gay culture will destroy society. All this feminism and gay culture will be least of my worries. The thing that concerns me more is the elite enslaving us with more taxes.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Supreme court judges have been handpicked and blackmailed since before I was born.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Just a ManParticipant 934]

They had to legalize gay marriage to keep the industry going. Heterosexuals aren’t doing it much anymore and the income must still be gotten somehow. Taxation without representation was a great idea, too bad we are quintuple-taxed, or more, without most even knowing it and representation? What the f~~~ is that? Society has the IQ of a moss covered rock and I only deal with it on an as needed basis.

Philosophy, the female repellent

[Anonymous 42]

What’s to stop brother and brother, or sister and sister? Once that’s established it would be seemingly discriminatory to stop brother and sister, or mother and son, or father and daughter from marrying…

This is what you get from the reprobate minds created in the feminist altered institutions of higher learning (ivy league)

I live in the aftermath of a reprobate court decision, Trust me, I know!

It’s all over for any semblance of good public order. The real chaos is about to begin… These asshole liberal reprobate judges are mostly to blame for all the misery that plagues and endangers this nation, “once upon a time” is going to apply to EVERYTHING! Eventually MGTOW will be the only human beings left alive. Seems like Armageddon is becoming more and more a reality on the horizon, not some storybook fantasy as it’s mocked and ridiculed by the same people to bring it on.

I’m getting some more popcorn, This is one HELL of a show!

 

[NO WAYParticipant 87]

You are right, brother. Pure genius. I feel the same way since my divorce.

The divorce lawyers will be mostly against it. It’s time for all dog owners to rise right now.

[griffinParticipant 189]

personally I don’t care, no one was ever going to prevent or stop people from being gay anyway…so why not let them get married?…now they can all suffer through the completely f~~~ed up court systems like the rest of us…good for them!

 

[Anonymous 42]

griffin wrote:

now they can all suffer through the completely f~~~ed up court systems like the rest of us…

@automation, it’s only the ink from a pen that f~~~s you in the end! If men could see the surgical tube connecting the pen to their neck (for endless ink to be drawn) to fill both your pen, the lawyers pen, judges pen, police pen, and all the others pens connected to his neck (like the Matrix) he would look at the woman holding the original pen (telling him to sign) and tell her to shove the pen and all it’s medical apparatus up her ass, then walk away a free man full of life supporting blood to empower his dynamic future! >>>>>>>>>>>>>M.G.T.O.W

We MGTOW are the only ones that can see in the darkness of feminism…..

[Executor MaxwellParticipant 591]

Beer wrote:

I’d marry my dog. I’d get to file my taxes as married and end up in a lower bracket, plus I’d make sure she had some puppies so I could claim them all as dependents. There would be no risk of divorce as dogs are actually loyal.

I’m already supporting her and cohabitating with her. It would just be a sexless marriage like a lot of human to human marriages end up anyhow. Actually it would be an open marriage…she’d have to get it from a dog have some puppies for me to claim as dependents, so if I had a mistress on the side it would be ok.

I started off typing that as a joke…but about 30 seconds into it I realized marrying a dog actually seems like a better decision than marrying a woman.

And that is why I always say I’d never call a woman a bitch.
I don’t think it’s okay to disparage dogs in such a manner.

[nerowolfeParticipant 13]

The SC ruling is unlawful, using the word “law” in its natural sense, not in the sense most people use it.  Since the FedGov has never followed its own laws, is it any surprise that 1/3 of it decides to interfere from the bench? Again? Using the same logic  the Supremes used, concealed carry permits must be recognized throughout the empire, too.

Not that I care if men or women want to marry each other. Makes no difference to me. Marriage is a religious sacrament, and has no place being regulated by state, local, or federal parasites. Along with a myriad of other human activities that Leviathan deems under its purview.

I refer the 9 lawyers in black robes to LysanderSooner.org for their education on what the Constitution says about enumerated powers. They just dont care.

[Anonymous 42]

nerowolfe wrote:

The SC ruling is unlawful, using the word “law” in its natural sense

@Nerowolf, I agree, I’m natural laws’ biggest fan!

It’s more than simple when you understand the basics! “Natural order” accompanies “natural law”, by overstepping the enumerated powers and molesting their limitations of powers, combined with each branch of government growing it’s limbs into the others responsibility, it all becomes an ill managed area of overgrowth, and like any overgrown ill managed property, it will surly decay into the ground, if it’s not consumed by fire first….

NATURAL LAW: CAN’T BEND IT, CAN’T BREAK IT, CAN’T CHANGE IT… However, be my guest,  you may challenge it, but remember, you can “die” trying…..

[nerowolfeParticipant 13]

@Tower Thanks for that. I put the wrong website address, it’s LysanderSpooner.org, not Sooner, late night typing.

 

Yes all human rights are derived from natural laws and, like natural laws, are immutable and universal to all people at all times.  Like George Carlin said, unless all rights are granted, then none are! If we allow those in power to determine what our rights are, then they are no longer rights, they are privileges.

Like the supposed privilege of driving a car.  Imagine going back a few years and demanding licenses to drive a horse. The progressives took that away from men, too.

[Anonymous 42]

@nerowolfe, thanks for the site, I saved it, I’m going to read it in detail, he’s from Athol, Mass., not far from here, a few miles North, also Shays rebellion was camped somewhere on rte.202 just North West off here.

And what do I get in my town for history? A “The” feminist c~~~ named “Lucy Stone” the suffragette that got women into university! F~~~ me!

As for me, instead of going along with the “corrupted master plan”, we not only made history, we were judicially snuffed out as a Massachusetts corporation and became history! A ruination of this republic’s body politic, the corruption of law and order has rendered a dead body politic and a criminal reckless endangerment on human life (a well documented human death trap) with a long and mighty train of judicial and executive abuse.

It’s not a total loss, Ben Franklin set the mile markers on what was rural rte 1 Boston post road (the first continental inland route.) they moved armaments from Springfield along this route during the revolutionary war.

I swear I can hear our forefathers cheering as we reject and point out all the abuse and how this progressive deviation has set this nation on a course to destruction……

[Author]

Posts