Trading Places

[RealityBitesParticipant 2198]

Men Trade Stocks on the Stock Market
When a guy makes some great trades other guys congratulate him for it

Women Trade C~~~s on the C~~~ Market
When a woman plays a man and makes some great trades other women congratulate her for it

[AwakenedParticipant 35221]

I guess I really don’t get what the big deal about the wealthiest man in the world getting divorced.

His standard of living is not going to change. H will not be sleeping in the Hotel Toyota. He will not have to suffer incarceration if he can’t make the court enforced extortion payments.

He will get divorced and pay her a half of a zillion dollars, and still walk away with a half of a zillion dollars.

He’s still a relatively young man with a HOT company that will make him many more Kazillions of dollars if he plays his cards right.

WHY GIVE A F~~~ ?????????????

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[JVBParticipant]

Like I said in a previous post. He won’t feel a thing.

Peace is > piece.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Come on jeff get lonely, miss your kids, pull a robbing williams.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22589]

Awakened wrote:

I guess I really don’t get what the big deal about the wealthiest man in the world getting divorced.

The divorce itself is not the issue. The issue is what the soon to be ex-wife plans to do with the stocks and other types of wealth she will gain be the courts through her divorce.

The economy right now is a bubble/house of cards. If she decides to cash in her stocks the whole tech bubble could collapse in her wake.

Such a situation would be poetic. For years the social media/tech companies have been pushing feminism SJW politics while censoring voices of sanity. It would be ironic if a feminist was the cause of a major tech stock crash.

[AwakenedParticipant 35221]

Faust For Science wrote:

If she decides to cash in her stocks the whole tech bubble could collapse in her wake.

And, it could also cause nothing more than a hiccup in just another day of an OVERLY INFLATED stock market that is already WAY OVER DUE for a correction….could, might, maybe ???????????

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22589]

Awakened wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

If she decides to cash in her stocks the whole tech bubble could collapse in her wake.

And, it could also cause nothing more than a hiccup in just another day of an OVERLY INFLATED stock market that is already WAY OVER DUE for a correction….could, might, maybe ???????????

Well, 70 billion, which is half of JB’s worth and is the minimum the wife is expected to get, is roughly around half of one percent of the total annual gross domestic product (GDP) of the U.S. economy. That do not sound like much until you realize that the actual liquidity (cash on hand) in the various markets is only single percentage points compared to the total values of the markets due to “debts” being considered “assets”.

If she decides to cash in her stocks there might not be enough cash on hand to do so, even though by law all stock transactions have to be paid in full at the end of each day. This is a type of liquidity trap and that is how stock bubbles are popped and sections of the market crash. While the “plug protection team” which is the government literally stopping the market from crash by shutting it down, a liquidity of the nature might be to much for simply holding a digital finger on the scales to keep the appearance of the markets to continue to appear to be fine.

[AwakenedParticipant 35221]

Faust For Science wrote:

Awakened wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

If she decides to cash in her stocks the whole tech bubble could collapse in her wake.

And, it could also cause nothing more than a hiccup in just another day of an OVERLY INFLATED stock market that is already WAY OVER DUE for a correction….could, might, maybe ???????????

Well, 70 billion, which is half of JB’s worth and is the minimum the wife is expected to get, is roughly around half of one percent of the total annual gross domestic product (GDP) of the U.S. economy. That do not sound like much until you realize that the actual liquidity (cash on hand) in the various markets is only single percentage points compared to the total values of the markets due to “debts” being considered “assets”.
If she decides to cash in her stocks there might not be enough cash on hand to do so, even though by law all stock transactions have to be paid in full at the end of each day. This is a type of liquidity trap and that is how stock bubbles are popped and sections of the market crash. While the “plug protection team” which is the government literally stopping the market from crash by shutting it down, a liquidity of the nature might be to much for simply holding a digital finger on the scales to keep the appearance of the markets to continue to appear to be fine.

First, I can’t imagine why she would want to liquify ALL her stock on any given day. Second, the way that I understand the market to work from my personal experience years ago is she can she can put in a sale order, but if there are not enough buyers to buy the stock she’s offering her sale will just stay open until enough buyers purchase her stock. Just because you put in an order to sell doesn’t mean that they will all be sold within one business day. If they are sold then yes it is recorded as a transaction, but until then it remains an “open order’. The market forces would dictate when and for how much her stock were sold.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[AwakenedParticipant 35221]

Faust For Science wrote:

If she decides to cash in her stocks there might not be enough cash on hand to do so, even though by law all stock transactions have to be paid in full at the end of each day.

Double Post……When I went to post it the first time; it looked like it got deleted. so, I re-wrote it ????

The way that I understand the market to work, and could be wrong, is that I may choose to put in a sell order to sell all of my stock in ABC company lets say at market rate to make them sell quickly. If I have more stock to sell than there are buyers then theoretically my “open” order to sell just remains an “open” order until the stocks are actually sold to buyers, and then the transaction is paid for and completed, and this may take much more than one day to complete. This is not taking into consideration that by dumping a HUGE amount of one stock on the market on any given day would also cause the stock to dramatically decrease in price. therefore, it would be financially devastating to herself as well as others to put in a sell order for 70 billion of stock. Just because she may own stock that the current market value is 70 Billion dos not equate to her to being able to liquify that amount over night.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Awakened wrote:

First, I can’t imagine why she would want to liquify ALL her stock on any given day. Second, the way that I understand the market to work from my personal experience years ago is she can she can put in a sale order, but if there are not enough buyers to buy the stock she’s offering her sale will just stay open until enough buyers purchase her stock. Just because you put in an order to sell doesn’t mean that they will all be sold within one business day. If they are sold then yes it is recorded as a transaction, but until then it remains an “open order’. The market forces would dictate when and for how much her stock were sold.

Very true. Sometimes you can use lack of volume to your advantage. I once nearly simultaneously in two separately logged in browsers and accounts, put in an order to sell a penny stock I owned at a huge loss, and had an order in a Roth IRA to buy it.

So I managed to essentially sell to myself, but from a regular brokerage account to the Roth. Roth IRA stock shares went up and I sold to recoup dollar amounts and will take the income when I retire, while sustaining a capital loss on the other account that was forwarded to the tune of $3,000 each year for several years on the income tax.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22589]

Awakened wrote:

First, I can’t imagine why she would want to liquify ALL her stock on any given day.

Would you trust the wealth you just gain in the hands of the person you used the courts to take it from?

[hdvrodParticipant 1109]

I hope she uses some of her newfound money to finance the wall on our southern border. Yeah, right…….

Anyway communication, real open communication, is not wanted or even required in a relationship. Women cannot handle fully open and honest communication, plus most perceive it as a weakness on the part of a man. All that is required is catering to her whims, and even then nothing is certain. There is no way to be sure of having a successful relationshit with a woman. MGTaoist

[AwakenedParticipant 35221]

Faust For Science wrote:

Awakened wrote:

First, I can’t imagine why she would want to liquify ALL her stock on any given day.

Would you trust the wealth you just gain in the hands of the person you used the courts to take it from?

IMHO, It’s simply not in her best financial interest to attempt and completely liquify an absolutely huge amount of stock in such a short period of time. I can’t imagine her financial and tax experts recommending such a move, and I can’t imagine someone with the financial and business intellect of her husband attempting some type of vendetta potentially jeopardizing the golden goose which represents his life’s accomplishments.

I’m guessing that like most couples that have been married for a long period of time that end up divorcing that this has been in the works for many years and there’s not exactly any surprises or emotional upsets on either side.

I’m just saying that we’re spending an awful lot of time, energy, and effort discussing a scenario which more than likely will never happen, and if it does will probably play itself out over a much longer course of time then within a matter of days for all types of financial and tax reasons that are way beyond the ability for either of us to understand with our limited amounts of financial/accounting/investment/tax expertise.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Author]

Posts