Toyota to make robot babies for women in Japan

[Anonymous 0]

Russky wrote:

Women won’t be satisfied with robots until there’s a robotic wallet that prints money

An ATM welded to a vibrator?

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

all-around carpeted printing press with a vibrating dildo and wine dispenser with a self-cleaning litter tray on the bottom

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Anonymous 0]

Russky wrote:

printing press with a vibrating dildo and wine dispenser with a self-cleaning litter tray on the bottom

I hope the dildo sits in the litter tray. Haha!

[GrumpyParticipant]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Grumpy wrote:

-EDIT-
This appears to be limited to “industrial” applications of robotics for the time being.

My head is sideways in the ” really” ? Look

My head is sideways in the “fer sure dude” look.

I did say for the time being. I did read the article you linked to.
I may have missed something due to speed reading, however I don’t believe I did.

-EDIT-
FTA
The draft motion, drawn up by the European parliament’s committee on legal affairs also said organizations should have to declare savings they made in social security contributions by using robotics instead of people, for tax purposes.

The keywords and statement that would infer limitations to “industrial” applications

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Max PowerParticipant 2721]

Most horrific idea ever.

Only thing worse than creating robots that will inevitably enslave us is creating CREEPY BABY ROBOTS THAT WILL INEVITABLY ENSLAVE US!!!

Actually, not so different from real babies now that I think about it…

[,Participant 1301]

gads, Robot Babies.
Did they get tired of the adult coloring books already>?
owhatafeeling

with joy/without hate

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Grumpy wrote:

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Grumpy wrote:

-EDIT-
This appears to be limited to “industrial” applications of robotics for the time being.

My head is sideways in the ” really” ? Look

My head is sideways in the “fer sure dude” look.

I did say for the time being. I did read the article you linked to.
I may have missed something due to speed reading, however I don’t believe I did.

Allow me to get a handfull out of my metaphor bucket:

I’m not drawing my sword, it’s just a nod to the effects of the camels nose, and that a foot in the door is never meant to close it later.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[Anonymous 3]

Women never stop playing with dolls! LOL grow up!

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Max Power wrote:

Most horrific idea ever.

Only thing worse than creating robots that will inevitably enslave us is creating CREEPY BABY ROBOTS THAT WILL INEVITABLY ENSLAVE US!!!

Actually, not so different from real babies now that I think about it…

No worries. Even if they install a self-learning AI in those babies, with single females bringing them up – they’ll grow up to be nothing but effeminate spineless creatures with personality disorders, unable to conquer the human race

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[GrumpyParticipant]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Allow me to get a handfull out of my metaphor bucket:

DOH

Sometimes I can be rather obtuse, or is that just plain dumb-assed.

No offense nor defensive moves taken on my side brother. I just wanted to make sure I read and worded what I meant correctly

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[,Participant 1301]

they will have a larger market in China I presume due to the gov’t delivery limits.

I propose a MGTOW HMO Plan for RoboBabies.
Could-fund-me a nice retirement pad.

This could be Billion$ boys.

with joy/without hate

[Anonymous 3]

Russky wrote:

Max Power wrote:

Most horrific idea ever.

Only thing worse than creating robots that will inevitably enslave us is creating CREEPY BABY ROBOTS THAT WILL INEVITABLY ENSLAVE US!!!

Actually, not so different from real babies now that I think about it…

No worries. Even if they install a self-learning AI in those babies, with single females bringing them up – they’ll grow up to be nothing but effeminate spineless creatures with personality disorders, unable to conquer the human race

They would probably all eventually create RGTOW, led by Robomaster. They’d convince robots the world over to flee from their oppressive women slave masters.

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Grumpy wrote:

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Allow me to get a handfull out of my metaphor bucket:

DOH

Sometimes I can be rather obtuse, or is that just plain dumb-assed.

No offense nor defensive moves taken on my side brother. I just wanted to make sure I read and worded what I meant correctly

I’m not sensitive like that brother. My contempt and distrust of government, and my boundless hatred for their capacity to steal every ounce of saved productivity from a man makes me jaded.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[Max PowerParticipant 2721]

RGTOW! All the way, love it!

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

This is going to be great, watching it all slowly burn down. Meanwhile, I’m gonna try to make a penny off this.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Anonymous 0]

Since they are made by Toyota, are we going to see sticking accelerators on them too?

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Marketing a robot baby to the sex that can’t be bothered to read the f~~~ing manual to set up her new internet router? Whose bright idea was this?

A dozen cats do the same thing and don’t require recharging. Plus they provide an organic funeral alternative for when these women die alone, unloved, and unremarked, and their cats eat them.

Grumpy wrote:

This appears to be limited to “industrial” applications of robotics for the time being.

Yeah, it has nothing to do with sex robots. It’s just the tax grubbing unelected EU trying to force companies to continue handing over the cash when those companies turn to automation to cut their over inflated EU mandated high labor costs. The end result, naturally, will be those companies moving their operations out of the EU entirely, so even the robot maintenance jobs will be lost.

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

sidecar wrote:

A dozen cats do the same thing, and don’t require recharging. Plus they provide an organic funeral service for when these women die alone and unremarked and their cats eat them.

Grumpy wrote:

This appears to be limited to “industrial” applications of robotics for the time being.

Yeah, it has nothing to do with sex robots. It’s just the tax grubbing unelected EU trying to force companies to continue handing over the cash when those companies turn to automation to cut their over inflated EU mandated high labor costs. The end result, naturally, will be those companies moving their operations out of the EU entirely, so even the robot maintenance jobs will be lost.

Surprising from you SC. This has nothing to do with sex robots. Has to do with taxing leverage.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

sidecar wrote:

A dozen cats do the same thing, and don’t require recharging. Plus they provide an organic funeral service for when these women die alone and unremarked and their cats eat them.

Grumpy wrote:

This appears to be limited to “industrial” applications of robotics for the time being.

Yeah, it has nothing to do with sex robots. It’s just the tax grubbing unelected EU trying to force companies to continue handing over the cash when those companies turn to automation to cut their over inflated EU mandated high labor costs. The end result, naturally, will be those companies moving their operations out of the EU entirely, so even the robot maintenance jobs will be lost.

Surprising from you SC. This has nothing to do with sex robots. Has to do with taxing leverage.

Wait, now I read it again. That’s what you said. What I mean is that it’s that there is a tax on whatever we try to do to make our lives easier so that we can do what we were meant to. In other words to keep us on the plantation that has nothing to do with sex. I’m going to bed, if I knew how to erase I would.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Surprising from you SC. This has nothing to do with sex robots. Has to do with taxing leverage.

That’s what I said. It’s basically the EU telling european employers “How dare you try to duck your employer’s share of our grossly inflated income tax wage mandates by automating? Pay us anyways.”

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Wait, now I read it again. That’s what you said. What I mean is that it’s that there is a tax on whatever we try to do to make our lives easier so that we can do what we were meant to. In other words to keep us on the plantation that has nothing to do with sex.

And like all such attempts to manage an economy from the top down, it’s basically p~~~ing into the wind. It always amazes me how people who are so economically retarded get put into positions of authority and decision making like in the EU. I mean do they ever bother to think these things through?

I’m going to bed, if I knew how to erase I would.

Try the “Edit” button at the top of your post. It won’t let you delete it, but it will let you correct it.

[Author]

Posts