Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Too sexy for work slut loses another frivoulous lawsuit.
This topic contains 7 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by
The Moth Attracted to the Flame 3 years, 12 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
This dumb broad lost her absurd lawsuit against Quest Labs claiming they gave her nerve damage. She also lost a previous suit against CitiBank claiming she was fired for being “too sexy” for dressing in provocative clothes.
When will these c~~~s realize that sexy is short for sexually arousing and that it is unprofessional to dress to be sexually arousing and distracting to her male co-workers? I applaud Citibank for taking a stand on this issue as most businesses still allow their female workers to dress like whores.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3434981/Too-sexy-work-woman-loses-lawsuit-claiming-clinic-caused-permanent-injury-venipuncture.htmlShe a classical attention whore whack job for sure. As soon as the defense points out her TV show that should make any future case invalid. Call it the Reality TV clause for defense against prosecution.
The author and proofreaders (?) of that article need to be let go too, there was bad spelling and grammar in almost every paragraph. It’s not just localized differences from the UK to the US either. Oh wait, the author’s a woman. It must be a man’s fault somehow.
I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.
Yet another New York trash bag whose too lazy to work for a living.

Yet, another c~~~, with absurd behavior expecting companies too give her something. Doesn’t think she needs to work for a living.
First comes pride, then comes disgrace.Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.
I’m glad she lost. I hope she is counter-sued for all the legal bills she forced her prey to pay for.
Disbarring her lawyer is a good idea too.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
So a company has a dress code, and you don’t abide by it so they fire you…how is that grounds to sue? So glad she lost…hopefully at some point she gets counter sued by some of these companies and has to cover their legal fees for filing frivolous suits…considering she has a history of it, that should be a slam dunk case.
This is why you shoudnt hire women.
Once there in they just try to catch the ceo.
When it does not work they scream rape or discrimination.Another c~~~ bites the dust.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
