Too many men.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

http://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=MzI4MDU5NTcwNg==&mid=2247486343&idx=1&sn=db674b2e5772427864882a9747a0a0ff&chksm=ebb75612dcc0df044ea413be9087fb827b45300d8ae464df31e65b37e955cdefc8d62eed4599#rd

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[BoarParticipant]

In other words, they have bred armies.

Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

[Will RobinsonParticipant 3479]

Quote: Men outnumber women by 70 million in China and India.

Quote: THE RISE OF CHINA AS A SUPERPOWER. It is one of the most impressive economic and political miracles in modern times. And it isn’t over yet.

https://www.thetrumpet.com/15672-the-rise-of-china-as-a-superpower

I’m still amazed that no country/leader has figured out the link yet. More men and fewer women makes a country economically much stronger and brings a wide range of other benefits.

First country to figure that out wins, and women will be screwed.

May you walk in peace and happiness, May you and all mgtow, near and far walk in peace and happiness.

[Point Of No ReturnParticipant 4074]

Too much of everything. If the planet’s population was decimated, this wouldn’t be a story, even if the ratio were the same.

Know when it is your duty to give them zero explanations for your actions.

[DocParticipant]

I might be missing something here but surely this will correct itself over the course of a human lifetime because all these men won’t be a able to have children so they’ll die off and the population rebalance.

It’s the number of women available for reproduction that determines the population size so if that number is dramatically lower than for men eventually the population of men per women will even itself back out.

In the meantime corners of the globe have millions of sex starved men itching for excitement.

I see a war brewing.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[AwakenedParticipant 35201]

Blue Pill Societies have bred tens of millions of Blue Pill Men that “feel” unfulfilled by not being able to have a wife/children, and are also looked down by their cultures for remaining single albeit by no choice of their own.

If ANY Places NEED Red Pills it is China and India !!!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Point Of No ReturnParticipant 4074]

Awakened wrote:

Blue Pill Societies have bred tens of millions of Blue Pill Men that “feel” unfulfilled by not being able to have a wife/children, and are also looked down by their cultures for remaining single albeit by no choice of their own.

If ANY Places NEED Red Pills it is China and India !!!

They may need them, but I’m afraid there are not enough of them pills to go around. There’s not enough of whatever-it-may-be to go around. I’m grabbing what I can, and off I go on my own way. I can’t be worried about the universe.

Know when it is your duty to give them zero explanations for your actions.

[OldBillParticipant]

Doc wrote:

I see a war brewing.

If by war you mean conflict between nation-states, that’s not a given. If by war you mean sectional conflicts and varying levels of internal instability, then yes.

This isn’t the bronze age. The Red Mandarins in Beijing and the BJP/INC in New Delhi aren’t going to lead armies over their borders on a series of gigantic bride stealing raids. While they may be tempted to rattle swords as a way of distracting their populations from other troubles, they won’t be purposely starting wars in the hopes of killing off their “surplus” male population.

The populations in question will re-balance, but not in a generation. Both populations will also be under great stress within a few decades as all these “surplus” males begin to age out. Both nations will be facing “interesting times” in the Chinese meaning of the phrase.

I’ll also point out that despite all the extra men there are in China, we’re all familiar here with news reports of “left over” women who somehow cannot find a husband.

Even with the numbers so grossly in their favor, many women were and are still too picky for too long to lock down a husbank.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 54]

Would the laws of supply and demamd create too much value for females?

Better to have slightly more females, with no right to vote!

( thats how you get Death threats Gentelmam! Haha)

But yes, a threat as any angry army to deal with.

Hey, our empowered manly tatoed smelly c~~~s can fight them!

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Um.. Might want to check those numbers. Not saying I’m good at math… But…

1. As per Census 2011, the population of India is 1210.19 million comprising 586.47 million (48.5%) females and 623.72 million (51.5%) males. Females have a share of 48.1% in the urban population and of 48.6% in the rural population.

China’s population stood at 1.36 billion at the end of last year, according to official statistics released this week, of whom 700 million are men and 667 million are women. “The gender ratio at birth is still dangerously high, with 115.88 boys born to every 100 girls in 2014,” the official Xinhua news agency reported.

so 33 billion extra men. Well, a sex doll is going to fix that in a hurry.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

A war is needed.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[Anonymous 12]

imagine when all these men wake up.

mwahahahaha

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Will Robinson wrote:

I’m still amazed that no country/leader has figured out the link yet. More men and fewer women makes a country economically much stronger and brings a wide range of other benefits.

I won’t say that the fact alone (less women) matter that much, but their power in society is something that I believe that matters.
70mi less women is one thing, but in ancient Greece women had their place well established, they couldn’t even own land, vote, or have the right for inheritance. Using that case as an example, the numbers don’t matter that much, 50/50 for each, is fine, but their power being limited is something that makes difference.

More a c~~~ knows her place, more “the family” can work and grow, and subsequently more success to whatever community that family is inserted into (town, state, country, etc…).

Fact that led us to the main purpose of feminism, destroy the family as it is known, to directly impact the country performance.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Doc wrote:

It’s the number of women available for reproduction that determines the population size so if that number is dramatically lower than for men eventually the population of men per women will even itself back out.

You misunderstand. It is not the demographic implosion they fear, it is the lack of a method to remove the excess resources single men accrue.

It’s all about getting men’s money. Single men are frugal and don’t feed the consumer market.

What about the surffiet of women in the elderly population especially in first world counties.

By census studies they have a model that says that in 2050 there will be 80 million elderly in the U.S. and the vast majority will be female. Elderly females might be set against young males in future global sex relations.

https://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/statbriefs/agebrief.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10902048

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Anonymous 3]

This article is filled with red pills, shamming language and blue pill programming.
Men that have no future without a woman in their life…
Men that turn to criminality because they cant find a wife…
Toxic masculinity everywhere…

And blatant red pills:

“I want to find a girlfriend, but I don’t have the money or the opportunity to meet them,” he said. “Girls have very high standards, they want houses and cars. They don’t want to talk to me.”

[hmskl’dParticipant 6406]

Interesting comparing those other countries. Here in Upper Midwest, North Central Region, Male percentage .. as of 2016,
Ohio Men 49%, Michigan Men 49%, Illinois Men 49%, Indiana 49%, Wisconsin 50% and United States of the 2010 Census population, 157.0 million were female (50.8 percent) while 151.8 million were male (49.2 percent).

[MoreSkyParticipant 4865]

This reminded me of an old thread by Monkeymind

/forums/topic/why-women-destroy-nations-sandboxed-by-youtube/#post-582752

The video in that thread was quite interesting:

"...reinvent your life because you must; it is your life and its history and the present belong only to you.” It is Your Life, Charles Bukowski.

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

Out of China’s population of 1.4 billion, there are nearly 34 million more males than females — the equivalent of almost the entire population of California, or Poland, who will never find wives and only rarely have sex.

OH NO!

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

In China and India, men outnumber women by 70 million.

And yet in both those countries there are millions upon millions of highly educated, well employed, career oriented, so-called “leftover women” who can’t get husbands because none of those millions of extra men will have them.

It shows how repellent modern women have made themselves, and also what a s~~~ deal marriage has become for men all the world over.

AWALT.

[experiencedParticipant]

Today’s Western options:

Boring and lonely and depressed and etc and etc.

OR

Boring and lonely and depressed and etc and etc. AND DESTROYED FINANCIALLY.

I’ll take the former and work on it until the negatives are gone…. many a happy single man!

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Author]

Posts