Things do not end well for this single mom

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Anonymous wrote:

Wait, yesterday, keymaster edited one my of comments, because I wrote, and I quote, “execute her”, under a post.

Are you sure? KM is pretty forthright, and I know I have on numerous occasions advocated a nice gallows in the public square and I don’t think I’ve been edited. Was there something else that could have been taken out of context?

[DorkShitParticipant 4353]

Zeitgeist wrote:

Think of what her daughter had to endure. A stupid woman leaves her child’s father and takes his daughter thousands of miles away room another country. Why? Because she CANNNN!

Yes she can. As per Florida law a custodial parent must petition in writing to the court and serve it upon the other parent, and every other person entitled to access to or time-sharing with the child. If there are no objections by the court or other interested party she may relocate. Compared to the draconian custody laws in some other states this doesn’t sound wholly unfair. Do you know she didn’t do this legally? Do you know if anyone objected? Do you know the circumstances around her breakup with the father? Do you know if her being a single parent was by choice or by dire necessity? If so please tell us because it wasn’t mentioned in the article

You act as if laws exist to be enforced and that the guilty always lose. You act as if right and wrong matters. You write as if in a perfect world. A world where a single mother petitions a family Court for permission to do anything that she wants to do. A crime so heinous tat Florida authorities would extradite and bring her to justice if she choose to move to Canada with HER daughter.

I will tell you what my lawyer told me when my ex-wife took my son 2000 miles away. My lawyer said that I could put an additional 5000 dollars in her retainer and she would petition the court and many months down the road I might win. But, no one goes to jail in family Court. It isn’t a felony. In the end a judge can’t force a mother to b3 a decent human being.

I don’t care if you believe me. I don’t care if you say I am prejudiced. It is apparent that you haven’t been violated well enough yet.

You ask, how do I know?
The answer is because I lived it.

The story has the facts. A mother was murdered in a crime of passion by a man that she CHOOSE to have a relationship with.

Why is this a fact?
Because that is what happens to single mom’s who make bad decisions.

That is why I an on this site. I am an example of what NOT to do.

How do I know?
Because, nothing good happens when exposed to a single mom.

I have zero tolerance for single mom’s. They are the scourge of our society

Peace brothers

[Anonymous 5]

PistolPete wrote:

Baylem93 wrote:

Wait, yesterday, keymaster edited one my of comments, because I wrote, and I quote, “execute her”, under a post.

Are you sure? KM is pretty forthright, and I know I have on numerous occasions advocated a nice gallows in the public square and I don’t think I’ve been edited. Was there something else that could have been taken out of context?

PistolPete wrote:

Baylem93 wrote:

Wait, yesterday, keymaster edited one my of comments, because I wrote, and I quote, “execute her”, under a post.

Are you sure? KM is pretty forthright, and I know I have on numerous occasions advocated a nice gallows in the public square and I don’t think I’ve been edited. Was there something else that could have been taken out of context?

I didn’t say anything else that was offensive.

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

Zeitgeist wrote:

I’m not prepared to make light of this. This is not the imaginary violence cooked up in the minds of feminists. This is real violence in all it’s ugliness. A woman dead, a child’s life destroyed. This shouldn’t happen to anyone male or female. Men will point the finger at the woman,

And this is why women, up until quite recently, living alone usually had some kind of societal oversight. Because women are weaker than men, tend to do worse in combat situations, and often just can’t handle themselves. I point the finger more at a society that says “sure, sugar plum, do lots of dangerous things, we’ll just make the world perfectly safe and crush all freedoms so you can be as stupid as you want.” She made bad decisions, and oddly enough paid the consequences for them. I have sympathy for all humans, but I only have so much sympathy as a total to spend. I am absolutely prepared to point the finger at this.

I am also absolutely prepared to laugh at this, or at anything I choose to laugh at. I’m Jewish, and laugh at holocaust jokes. I’ve had a f~~~ed up life, and choose, often, to laugh about it. It’s healthier than crying. I laugh at whatever the f~~~ I want to laugh at.

Awakened wrote:

I’m going out on a limb here and saying this young women was a train wreck in perpetual motion.

laughing You can see it right in her eyes. Pretty, very very pretty, wearing a camo jacket. Two years ago I would have wrecked my world for a girl like this, and she would have given zero s~~~s about me. There are alphas, there are betas . . . and there are pis. Pis are irrational. Like playing russian roulette, are girls picking up rough trade.

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t really disagree with you, but this is what is called “concern trolling” and it’s really not appropriate most of the time.

Bingo! Yeah, zero f~~~s given. I sympathize, frankly, because she’s a hot chick and I’d like to f~~~ her and tame her and make her mine. I’d also like a pony (delicious!) and to win the lottery. To concern troller: If you actually give a s~~~, send a condolence card to the kid.

Cap285 wrote:

Sure it is. When people are stupid. She rode the bad boy train and got what usually comes with messing around with these guys. Injury, or in this case, the lock shot off her soul cage.

That is such an awesome f~~~ing line. I’m stealing it.

Cap285 wrote:

We have one like this at work. Moved in with an abusive douche that doesn’t work and does drugs. She probably did because she likes drugs. And she’s out of options as she has multiple kids, turns away ever decent guy and thinks work is a junior high environment.

Sure, decent guys are boring. Alphas play, betas pay. But pis – who never look like pis – cut and rend and tear. Pis have one eye burning and one eye dead. Spin that wheel! Double 00s, not so good.

It’s nice to see independent women making choices and living independently. It always works out well. That’s why society is in such awesome shape.

Pretty girl. Wild, but not as wild as she thought she was. In a better age, she would have made a fun wife, with a nice laugh and a wicked smile.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Zeitgeist wrote:

I don’t see anything wrong in pointing out that actions have consequences, sometimes dire ones. Or countering the obvious standard issue blue pill bulls~~~ that a woman who dies and has a young child is automatically canonized as a great mother, even when the facts are so obvious that she wasn’t.

Yes we are all responsible for our actions and must suffer the consequences. So tell me, what did this woman do to deserve death? Leave the father? Get a new boyfriend? Get a job in a bar? Do any of those actions so offend you that you’re willing to say she had it coming? No one here is canonizing this woman because of her death. Maybe she was a rotten mother; maybe she wasn’t. We have not enough evidence to come to a conclusion about that either way. And yet; even in an almost complete vacuum of facts many here have made up their own facts, made up their minds about this woman’s life and her behavior and have passed judgement. My god. You guys are as bad as the f~~~ing feminists.

I’m committed to going my own way, but this is the wrong way.
I’m out of here.

You are saying a lot of s~~~, s~~~ that I never said. If I say that it was a stupid idea for a man to drive drunk, speeding and not wearing a seatbelt, am I saying that HE DESERVED to die? AM I saying I am glad his kids are now without a father? Don’t put that s~~~ on me just to make yourself feel morally superior.

I think you need to check yourself and stop lashing out at your brothers, most of whom have suffered serious pain and loss of family due to the same types of impulsive, stupid, selfish choices that this woman made. SHE DID NOT PUT HER CHILD FIRST. She engaged in all sorts of dangerous behavior, as many brothers have laid out here.

We all have some blue pill dormant inside us and have to deal with it at points. I found some of mine today when I heard Mary Tyler Moore passed and saw a clip of her that took me back to a very young man. You need to ask yourself why you are responding this way, and white knighting and virtue signaling on this.

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

DorkShit wrote:

I have zero tolerance for single mom’s. They are the scourge of our society

On a different thread, I was wondering what went so very f~~~ing wrong with feminism as compared to 1960s and early 1970s Mary Tyler Moore feminism. I don’t know what happened from the “women can do more things that men are currently doing” to trigglypuff and the collapse of the West.

This is one of the keys. In 60s and 70s sitcoms, which reflected what networks thought people wanted to see, what people wanted, the only time a woman would have been raising children alone is if her husband was dead. And then it would have been a *great big* f~~~ing deal.

Single mothers are everything wrong with the West. I wasn’t a huge Quayle fan, but even at the time – progeny of a train wreck of a divorced single parent – I couldn’t understand why anyone in their right mind would defend single moms. Every single mother I actually knew was one match short of a conflagration. I hadn’t even heard of any single mothers who were doing well. They were all bats~~~, and this was twenty-five years ago. Candice Bergen’s character on the show (and, Hell, Candice Bergen) was f~~~ing crazy to begin with. A kid was not going to improve the situation. And . . . the country got offended, and everybody had a temper tantrum, and the commie pinkos had their say . . . and here we are now, so very much the f~~~ing worse.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[DorkShitParticipant 4353]

Elric Greenstone wrote:

Darksith wrote:

I have zero tolerance for single mom’s. They are the scourge of our society

On a different thread, I was wondering what went so very f~~~ing wrong with feminism as compared to 1960s and early 1970s Mary Tyler Moore feminism. I don’t know what happened from the “women can do more things that men are currently doing” to trigglypuff and the collapse of the West.

This is one of the keys. In 60s and 70s sitcoms, which reflected what networks thought people wanted to see, what people wanted, the only time a woman would have been raising children alone is if her husband was dead. And then it would have been a *great big* f~~~ing deal.

Single mothers are everything wrong with the West. I wasn’t a huge Quayle fan, but even at the time – progeny of a train wreck of a divorced single parent – I couldn’t understand why anyone in their right mind would defend single moms. Every single mother I actually knew was one match short of a conflagration. I hadn’t even heard of any single mothers who were doing well. They were all bats~~~, and this was twenty-five years ago. Candice Bergen’s character on the show (and, Hell, Candice Bergen) was f~~~ing crazy to begin with. A kid was not going to improve the situation. And . . . the country got offended, and everybody had a temper tantrum, and the commie pinkos had their say . . . and here we are now, so very much the f~~~ing worse.

Right there with you.

Back in the day tragedy made a woman a single mother. Most notably a war widow. Or a job accident widow, etc.

The village/family/govt, etc helped the single mom. It was understood that she couldn’t do it alone. Common sense.

Today our society is illogical. A snowflake can do it all. This snowflake was working two jobs and busting her ass to provide for herself and her daughter. Who was protecting her daughter?

Why was she working service jobs? Hmmm. Maybe it was because she lacked the education or skills to do anything beyond menial. Welcome to single mom hood.

Well, atleast she didn’t resort to prostitution or stripping? Yeah, like it mattered. That made her a wonderful woman.

Who was taking care of the kid….
Some will say she didn’t deserve to die.
I say that the child didn’t deserve to be in that situation.
I say that society doesn’t deserve single mothers.

But like her, we get what we get as a result of the decisions made.

It’s just a single mother rabbit hole. Facts, we need facts! Well, she was a single mother raising her daughter and she made decisions that resulted in her death. What decisions?

Does it matter if I know every detail?

There will be a funeral with flowers and grieving people. They will say how tragic it was. What a wonderful mother she was. What a wonderful person she was. People will hug each other and then they will live their life. The end.

Peace brothers

[experiencedParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

Sometimes riding the c~~~ carousel can be dangerous.

Did you catch that, laydee lurkers?
Congrats! These are now your choices of choices.
The box is getting smaller.
No, not your box.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[HammerheadParticipant 362]

There’s not enough information contained in this article to extrapolate/speculate very much. Apparently she was killed by her boyfriend, possibly due to their recent breakup?
Some of you are going off the rails trying to paint this woman as the epitome of a stereotypical single mother. I just don’t see it, based on the minimal information provided in the article. I think that it’s tragic that her child has been left motherless under these circumstances, period. Some of the comments in this thread leave me horrified, since they represent the stereotype of the sort of – – usually unjustified – – criticism of the MGTOW philosophy/movement/concept/whatever-the-hell-you-want-to-call-it as a misogynistic hate group. Even the tag attached to the thread (“Save-A-Hoe”) is grossly inappropriate.
There’s nothing wrong with calling out bad behavior, or for experience red-pill rage when it’s justified. But I’ve been there, done that, and seen real violence and death. There’s nothing that justifies some of the speculative and disgusting comments in this case.
I call them as I see them. I am ashamed of being associated with some of you. Grow up.

[Author]

Posts