There never was equilibrium

Topic by Antipathy

Antipathy

Home Forums MGTOW Central There never was equilibrium

This topic contains 12 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Silverstone the Second  Silverstone the Second 3 years, 5 months ago.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #283338
    +8
    Antipathy
    Antipathy
    Participant
    4901

    Back in the day, the man worked his ass off. While the female stayed at home and raised the “kids”. How is this equal ? It’s not. The female still had it easier. Now it’s either the same or worse. Now they search for guys with extra resources to sponge off. And they don’t even raise the kids or take care of the household anymore. They just want to lay around on twitter and facebook and watch soap operas. Either that or they want a hollywood/yuppy lifestyle full of expensive shopping and luxury.

    There never was equality, we’ve been expected to be disposable resource pumpers for the females to expend. I know at last walking away from the whole damn thing is the only way to go.

    #283350
    +3
    ScarberianMPTGL
    ScarberianMPTGL
    Participant
    3286

    Yep, and on top of all that, they demand to be paid more or at least as much as we are for the same job, even though they don’t work nearly as hard as we do. All in the name of “equality”.

    I, Lelouch Vi Britannia, command you, all of you, to Go Your Own Way!!

    #283360
    +4
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35862

    Back in the day, the man worked his ass off. While the female stayed at home and raised the “kids”. How is this equal ? It’s not.

    It used to be more equal when women had to cook over a fire, clean with wood ash, do laundry on a rock down at the river, spend hours at the quirn grinding grain for the daily bread, waiting hours for the same to rise, spend an equal time churning the daily butter, pickling food so it doesn’t spoil, and so on.

    Then men invented things like heated indoor plumbing, laundry machines, automatic dishwashers, electric ranges, microwave ovens, vacuum cleaners, refrigerators, detergents, and all these other amazing time saving devices for women.

    Which only gave women time to gin up complaints about how “men never help around the house”.

    And another thing: men have also seen a lot of technological changes in their work. However the technology for men’s work serves to increase productivity. It’s all basically a better grindstone for him to put his nose to for eight hours a day.

    Meanwhile the technology for women’s work is all about saving her time. So women get a lot more free time to themselves, presumably to watch advertisements on television for things women can buy with the money earned by men.

    #283363
    +2
    Newgrounds
    Newgrounds
    Participant
    558

    Sexual dimorphism has a lot to do with it, of course the modern woman doesn’t deserve half the things she has but in the olden days it was more equal in terms of work but never truly equal due to women not even being physically capable of doing half the labor that a man is capable of. We will always have to pick up the slack until the artificial womb is created, in ancient times it was up to us to keep them safe and healthy for reproduction purposes which is a s~~~ty deal but beats becoming extinct.

    |Right Wing Death Squad| Swallowed both Red Pills /pol/MGTOW

    #283375
    +4
    Antipathy
    Antipathy
    Participant
    4901

    I might add .. whent he wars came the men were expected to die. Still are. The women did what during WWII ? Well they did what they could to support the war effort. Was it easy for them to stand in blistering heat or freezing cold making uniforms, belts, hats, botts etc ? No it was not easy. But the men were the ones expected to die.

    Again, no equilibrium.

    #283378
    +3
    Newgrounds
    Newgrounds
    Participant
    558

    Again I feel like that is sexual dimorphism again, women have low combat lethality and awareness compared to men and if both genders went off to war who would watch the younger generations, you could argue that they both could but why would you want someone superior (men) to stay behind to let someone inferior (women) go off to war? You can’t even trust a woman to carry you off the battlefield if you’re wounded or carry munitions. Ever hear about the first female fighter pilot for the RAF what a joke that was truth is we can’t have women fighting wars because they’re 50x more of a liability than they are an asset. There will never be equilibrium which is why we’re MGTOW to begin with to say f~~~ all about caring about things we can’t change and going our own way. You can’t make two things that aren’t equal equal, it’s like getting my old GTX 780 against running it against my GTX 1080 try as it will it will never produce better results than my 1080 in any circumstance.

    |Right Wing Death Squad| Swallowed both Red Pills /pol/MGTOW

    #283382
    +2

    Anonymous
    5

    It used to be more equal when women had to cook over a fire, clean with wood ash, do laundry on a rock down at the river, spend hours at the quirn grinding grain for the daily bread, waiting hours for the same to rise, spend an equal time churning the daily butter, pickling food so it doesn’t spoil, and so on.

    Even today with the majority of the world’s population living in 3rd world conditions, it’s a huge daily grind just to collect firewood and water as well as the above mentioned daily tasks.
    However, if any of us had a real choice we’d have preferred those s~~~ty jobs compared to the extremely high risk dangers and exploitation that men face in these 3rd world conditions when trying to provide for and protect their families.

    There used to be almost mutual utility between the sexes but men were/are always far better suited to survive alone in any environment than women.
    In our own western environment men have taken over all the jobs of women including effectively paying/supplying the water and fuel, as well as paying/supplying cloths (traditionally another tedious female job)
    We can’t even expect cooking and cleaning now BECAUSE THAT’S SEXIST!!!

    These entitled c~~~s only supply the fleshlight between their legs now, and even then, they’ll expect to be continually chased, pandered to, adored and romanced. All of which reinforces the illusion that they’re the “Needed” ones.

    The only sane decision is to get a fleshlight online and cut out the middle wo-man.

    #283383
    +4
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    The institution that is marriage is based apron a reality that existed before the industrial revolution. It needed and update 80 years ago it’s just stupid that no one has addressed this.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #283387
    +2
    Antipathy
    Antipathy
    Participant
    4901

    Again I feel like that is sexual dimorphism again, women have low combat lethality and awareness compared to men and if both genders went off to war who would watch the younger generations, you could argue that they both could but why would you want someone superior (men) to stay behind to let someone inferior (women) go off to war? You can’t even trust a woman to carry you off the battlefield if you’re wounded or carry munitions. Ever hear about the first female fighter pilot for the RAF what a joke that was truth is we can’t have women fighting wars because they’re 50x more of a liability than they are an asset. There will never be equilibrium which is why we’re MGTOW to begin with to say f~~~ all about caring about things we can’t change and going our own way. You can’t make two things that aren’t equal equal, it’s like getting my old GTX 780 against running it against my GTX 1080 try as it will it will never produce better results than my 1080 in any circumstance.

    Indeed. This is a good post newgrounds. It’s an interesting perspective. There are other jobs i wouldn’t trust a female to do as well as men too. The male mind seems to be made or to have evolved past the female mind in certain fields of work.

    #283405
    +2
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35862

    Even today with the majority of the world’s population living in 3rd world conditions, it’s a huge daily grind just to collect firewood and water as well as the above mentioned daily tasks.

    And yet you don’t hear those women bitching and whining for “equality”, now do you?

    However, if any of us had a real choice we’d have preferred those s~~~ty jobs compared to the extremely high risk dangers and exploitation that men face in these 3rd world conditions when trying to provide for and protect their families.

    Which is why we don’t see the women bitching and moaning, because they don’t want they s~~~ty jobs men there have to do.

    My argument isn’t against equality or for it, because our basic biology means there will never be any such thing no matter what we want. A lack of equality isn’t really an issue any more than a lack of wngs for flying.

    What bothers me are all the spoiled rotten selfish entitled c~~~s who always demand more for themselves (at the expense of men) and try to call it “equality”. But their comeuppances is coming, because in their selfish quest for “equality” they are going to have actual equality rammed down their throats, having to take on the burdens of men that men are walking away from. Burdens that women simply aren’t built for.

    But that is not our problem.

    #283431
    +1

    Anonymous
    1

    Back in the day, the man worked his ass off. While the female stayed at home and raised the “kids”. How is this equal ? It’s not. The female still had it easier. Now it’s either the same or worse. Now they search for guys with extra resources to sponge off. And they don’t even raise the kids or take care of the household anymore. They just want to lay around on twitter and facebook and watch soap operas. Either that or they want a hollywood/yuppy lifestyle full of expensive shopping and luxury.

    By not cohabitating or getting married I am able to remove myself from any concerns about any perceived “equilibrium” – or lack there of.

    #283494
    +2
    Tuneout
    Tuneout
    Participant

    The institution that is marriage is based apron a reality that existed before the industrial revolution. It needed and update 80 years ago it’s just stupid that no one has addressed this.

    I’ve read some States in America are trying to do just that,it will be interesting to see if they are sucessful.

    Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

    #283756

    Yes.

    It’s always been a raw deal for men. A lot of mgtow’s critics think we want to go back to the 1950’s. F~~~ that s~~~. Yeah, work long hours, be miserable, then die. It’s still a s~~~ty deal.

    I don’t want to be married and slave away and have nothing to show for it. So marriage back then was a s~~~ty deal, and now when you can lose half of your s~~~ and never even see your kids? That’s an even worse deal. It’s a matter of degrees of s~~~tiness. I would have been a bachelor back then, I’m a bachelor now.

    Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.