The To Many, Sugar Baby, problem?

Topic by bigboy83

Bigboy83

Home Forums MGTOW Central The To Many, Sugar Baby, problem?

This topic contains 8 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by RoyDal  RoyDal 3 years, 11 months ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #189867
    +4
    Bigboy83
    bigboy83
    Participant
    11312

    Recently their was a post on Mgtow, talking about Women in Great Britain,250,000 of them looking for Sugar Daddies!

    First, The Supply and Demand Rule is in play, and if more women are going to choose this path, they’ll have to compete with others

    So, sorry looking pretty won’t be good enough.

    Second, They’ll have to offer more, like a maid service, errand girl, etc. It will be more like full time job for them.

    Third, If there is too many of these women, then they’ll have to seperate themselves from the pack. And explain, why there better then there counterparts.

    Fourth, A BOOM THAT WILL END IN A BUST!

    GOOD LUCK!

    Cheers

    Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

    #189925
    +3

    Anonymous
    0

    Still don’t understand all the opposition from mgtow towards this phenomenon, personally i fully support it because women are being HONEST about their intentions in relationships, about what they value and what they are willing to trade it for
    furthermore, the “sugar daddies” know what they’re getting into, in their minds they are getting the good deal, which honestly at the end of the day is subjective to the man and how much said man values young hot pussy and how much hes willing to pay for it, and of course these women are thinking they are getting the good deal.
    Overall i think its a good thing since its shedding light to blue pill men about what women actually want, perhaps they will listen.

    #189926
    +2
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    And I presume these women might want to get married someday…

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #189933
    +1
    Spacemonkey
    Spacemonkey
    Participant
    1481

    Still don’t understand all the opposition from mgtow towards this phenomenon, personally i fully support it because women are being HONEST about their intentions in relationships, about what they value and what they are willing to trade it for

    Not really. Most of the profiles are very vague about what they are willing to put out at the same time as demanding very high financial input from you. If you want to pay for sex then get a profesional, cash upfront and you know exactly what you are paying for.

    “Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

    #189941
    +2

    One of the funniest things about feminism is that it took away the best things women had going for them. Before feminism, men were content to chase women and then slave away to support them.

    Now that women are “liberated” now they’ll have to compete with other women. Turns out that men are in high demand! Meanwhile, pussy is easier to get than it’s ever been, I don’t have to get married, I can go f~~~ a different woman every night, and the market place value of pussy has gone way down. And now we have women all looking for a sugar daddy.

    I don’t think this is bad news. Women are now being honest about their intentions, and I might be naive, but I’d like to think most men rich enough to qualify as sugar daddies know how women react to money, and they know they can drop one woman and go find another one to f~~~ 5 minutes later. Looks like these bitches will have to step their game up.

    Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

    #189943
    +1
    OldBill
    OldBill
    Participant

    Still don’t understand all the opposition from mgtow towards this phenomenon…

    That’s because you don’t quite understand the Sugar Baby/Daddy phenomenon. You’re confusing it with prostitution, something it manifestly is not.

    … personally i fully support it because women are being HONEST about their intentions in relationships…

    But they’re not being honest. A prostitute or escort has a known schedule of services. You know, up front and before money changes hands, that a certain amount of money will purchase a certain act or acts. That’s honesty, X will get you Y. The same can’t be said about the Sugar Baby/Daddy “relationship”.

    Rather than a prostitute’s or escort’s known schedule of services, what Sugar Babies promise in return for payment is vague and nebulous. In fact, all that Sugar Babies are honest about is their demands.

    Sugar Babies demand up front gifts, money, trips, meals, and the like while offering nothing guaranteed in return. In fact, the only difference between Sugar Babies and “normal” women working the c~~~ carousel is that a Sugar Baby’s demands are known up front. What you’ll get in return for acceding to those demands is still unknown and, if you press, they play the “He’s offering me money for sex” card and have you arrested.

    Putting it in simple terms:

    – Prostitutes and escorts are completely honest. They flatly state that paying X will get you Y.
    – Sugar Babies are only partially honest. They demand X up front, but then won’t specify exactly what X will buy.
    – “Normal” women are completely dishonest. They pretend they don’t want X, but continually imply that if given X they’ll show gratitude in some form.

    Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

    #189945
    +3
    Enjoy The Decline
    Enjoy The Decline
    Participant
    1719

    Man, I am sure that many of these young girls just want to invest in themselves by having their sugar daddies pay for their education. It is usually very hard for the poor to become middle class through education with all the disadvantages they have there in Great Britain. I don’t think that those smart ones would do this long term.

    "Question everything" - Albert Einstein

    #189955
    +1
    OldBill
    OldBill
    Participant

    Man, I am sure that many of these young girls just want to invest in themselves by having their sugar daddies pay for their education.

    You are being sarcastic, right?

    It is usually very hard for the poor to become middle class through education with all the disadvantages they have there in Great Britain.

    Financially it’s easier actually. Tuition is means tested and capped at a max of around 9000 pounds (less than that in Wales and Scotland) while endowments and bursaries are widely used.

    The tough part is finding a place in university because the UK “lacks” the US’ huge number of worthless “community colleges”, “tech institutes”, and “on-line schools” while also “lacking” many of the worthless degree programs most traditional colleges and universities in the US offer.

    I don’t think that those smart ones would do this long term.

    The smart ones aren’t doing it at all and the vast majority of the ones trying to do it aren’t doing so to pay for the Underwater Feminist Basket Weaving degree. Instead, they’re chavs looking to for additional disposable income.

    Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

    #190024
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    Still don’t understand all the opposition from mgtow towards this phenomenon,

    I’m not opposed to it. I’m just not stupid enough to fall for it.
    Falling for it is a job for some other simp.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.