The real-world effects of Male Birth Control

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Just a thought,
But I am of the opinion that 1) This technology has long been capable of being produced and 2) I am almost for certain that once it actually is released, Western society will more than likely see an intense plummet in birth rates a decade or two afterwards. It is one thing to give women the option to bare children, quite another when men, being generally of sound mind and judgement, are given equal options.

While I have no rock solid evidence to support this claim, gut instinct tells me I’m not too far off from the truth. Any thoughts?

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[TaxGuyParticipant]

I’ve been saying the same thing for a few years. It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if the drug already existed. Women will say they can’t trust a man to take it every day, when in fact it’s women that can’t be trusted. And I think there are some people out there that are afraid of the societal change that could be brought about.

For the first time in the history of humanity, men will have complete control over their reproduction. Women aren’t ready to give up the ultimate power.

It’s akin to opening Pandora’s box.

Order the good wine

[HitmanParticipant]

Too bad feminism wasn’t about equality. ..or we would have a male birth control pill already.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

TaxGuy wrote:

It’s akin to opening Pandora’s box.

Well now, just excuse me for a moment while I go grab the pick-ax and chainsaw. And a few of course.

On a more serious note, I can definitely understand when you say they aren’t ready to give up their “ultimate power” just yet. Come to think of it, that probably will take place once MGTOW becomes the standard and not the exception. Call it a last ditch effort to try to re-balance or regain some form of normalcy in the realm of creating a family culture. And by then it will be much to late.

I realize that prediction sounds like it’s reaching, but given the current state of relationships, I’m at least expecting to see it reach fruition in this lifetime.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[TuneoutParticipant]

We already do have male BC ,it’s called MGTOW!

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

TaxGuy wrote:

I’ve been saying the same thing for a few years. It wouldn’t surprise me a bit if the drug already existed.

I must have failed! I’ve posted this MANY times but reliable, reversible male birth control is almost in clinical trials:

Vasalgel home

It’s very close to being ready – we’re talking like next year. 🙂

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5cuzj7i1Whs/maxresdefault.jpg

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Anonymous 54]

There have been female spermicied sponge things or something like that.(some chick i new back when used it) Theve had this tech for years.
They know what would happen if it was allowed ever allowed to be approved.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Whoa, hold up… DONATIONS? You’re telling me a major/ big pharma isn’t backing this? WTF? That makes me wonder, what do they stand to lose if this goes live, and will the FDA drag feet on this if they are going to have a say in the regulation of it… I’m hopeful, but something sounds a tad bit off on this one…

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

As to the effects, you’re correct – it should be VERY interesting. A lot of women don’t want to admit that getting pregnant is the “ace up their sleeve” (or up somewhere anyway).

Sometimes you hear them complain that birf control is a burden that women have to bear, but I guarantee they don’t like the idea of losing that control.

I’d be surprised if something didn’t happen with vasalgel to stop it from coming to market, which is why you should ALL go over to their site and donate to the cause – it’s non-profit.

I honestly think the big pharma haven’t done this because they’ve done the cost benefit analysis and realize they will make more money on unwanted pregnancies and all the extra business that comes with that than the one time fee for plugging your vas.

But that’s just speculation.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[GrumpyParticipant]

A level playing field, no more entrapment pregnancies, men having the ability to chose when and if they want to become parents?

The idealist in me thinks;

1. That would mean pregnancies would be a “mutual consent” agreement. Some brilliant legal beagle will have to come up with a generic “pregnancy contract” that protects both people, and provides legal ramifications for both “equally” as well, if they fail or renege on the contractual obligations.

2. This should decrease the unwanted pregnancy numbers, as well as reduce the states (taxpayer) forced financial support for welfare in its current form.

3. The state having the power to remove children from users/abusers of the welfare system and raising them as wards of the state. ( the positive is not having to pay for welfare mommies, the negative is slaves of the state being raised).

My practical self thinks it wont happen because it will create a “rights of he state” vacuum, eliminating a large portion of the populations not being able to rely on the state for support, leading to a loss of votes through largess. There goes a ton of SJW/welfare/parasite voters.

just my thoughts.

EDIT
I forgot, just to reinforce other comments here. Follow the money.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

I honestly think the big pharma haven’t done this because they’ve done the cost benefit analysis and realize they will make more money on unwanted pregnancies and all the extra business that comes with that than the one time fee for plugging your vas.

But that’s just speculation.

That actually makes perfect sense. Why collect a one-time/ bi-yearly fee when you can get a whole ‘nother body and all the illnesses that come along with it to buy into big pharma. That’s kind of a scary thought.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Binary Logic wrote:

Just a thought,
But I am of the opinion that 1) This technology has long been capable of being produced and 2) I am almost for certain that once it actually is released, Western society will more than likely see an intense plummet in birth rates a decade or two afterwards. It is one thing to give women the option to bare children, quite another when men, being generally of sound mind and judgement, are given equal options.

Your spot on. Giving birth to control to someone who is biologically wired to want a baby is pointless. It only serves as a weapon of deceit to lure in some unsuspecting sperm donor. (See: the scorpion and frog). Giving men control of birth control would be an apocalypse event to the entire baby industry. Prenatal care, postnatal care and the huge list of beneficiaries from this billion dollar industry are in no way going the give men control of their profits.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Binary Logic wrote:

Whoa, hold up… DONATIONS? You’re telling me a major/ big pharma isn’t backing this? WTF?

Ya you would think, right? But see above. It’s not in their financial best interests. Having you pay a 3000% premium for “Children’s Tylenol” for the next ten years IS however in their financial best interests.

Speaking of which, I used to make my own childrens tylenol by figuring out the total number of doses in a bottle, and then crushing up acetaminophen and making a solution of the same concentration in some sugar water. Add in a little grape Kool-aid from the concentrated(unsweetened) packets, and voila. I had children’s tylenol at like 1/300th the cost.

I just made small batches with the sugar level high enough to make it preservative, refrigerated etc.

Not a recommendation. I’m not a doctor, see your physician, don’t try this at home, for erections lasting longer than 3 hours get a bottle of champagne, etc etc.

It worked great for my kid though.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

FrostByte wrote:

Giving men control of birth control would be an apocalypse event to the entire baby industry. Prenatal care, postnatal care and the huge list of beneficiaries from this billion dollar industry are in no way going the give men control of their profits.

All the more reason to donate to the parsemus foundation. See above for link.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Binary Logic wrote:

While I have no rock solid evidence to support this claim, gut instinct tells me I’m not too far off from the truth. Any thoughts?

Are you kidding? Male birth control will END bitches like this — forever. You will notice a HUGE wave of panic and marked turn around in female behavior , because a man will FINALLY be able to decide NOT to be a father, and he will be under no obligation to disclose that information.

“Oops! I guess I’m shooting blanks!”

Then add the artificial womb into the mix where a man can now also decide TO be a father, and the world will be totally different place. Every woman’s only last bargaining chip will be…. gone.

Binary Logic wrote:

Just a thought,

Oh it’s much more than just a thought.
It’s a revelation and it’s only a matter of time.

If it were up to me and I could finance it, I would make a male pill a reality for sale everywhere.

I would make it my mission in life.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

All the more reason to donate to the parsemus foundation. See above for link.

The pic of them shoving a needle in a dogs nut is not going to promote sales. I’m sure the product is good but the marketing needs work.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 54]

How many marrages do think where done by entrapment?

Happend to my youngest brother.

They went on vacation. She forgot her pills. She forgot to tell him she forgot her pills.
This would unleash panic in bitches!

[Anonymous 54]

How many marrages do think where done by entrapment?

Happend to my youngest brother.

They went on vacation. She forgot her pills. She forgot to tell him she forgot her pills.
This would unleash panic in bitches!

There now divorced. Cost him..ready….7 digets.But he said it was
worth it

[Anonymous 54]

F~~~ im an idiot. Now you know why he makes 7 didgets and im a broke ass! hahha
Sorry guys.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Anonymous wrote:

F~~~ im an idiot. Now you know why he makes 7 didgets and im a broke ass! hahha

No worries Sage – probably WORTH repeating 😉

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Author]

Posts