The origin of two different species

[Anonymous 3]

In my first post of this series I presented the realization that man and woman are so different in behavior, values and interests, that they might be two different species altogether.

We can now look at the origin of this phenomenon to gather more information about the interactions between these two species.

The first thing is to understand the reasons for this physical and psychological differentiation between male and female. It is actually easy: specialization and teamwork.

Nature delayed the growing up for the human species. Infants learn at faster rate than adults. By slowing down the development into adult, it was possible for humans to surpass the intellectual level of every other animal.

But that comes with a cost. Human children are vulnerable and require care and supervision for a long time before they can fend for themselves. Therefore nature divided the work between males and females: males would specialize in protection, construction and hunting, females would take care of children and forage (something that could be done while taking care of children).

This division created a specialization on a physical and psychological level:
– males would be physically stronger and resistant, using objective and goal oriented thinking to build and hunt in small groups dedicated to specific tasks.
– females did not need to be strong, and their thinking would be oriented to picking up stuff to eat, operating in large social groups of women and children.

We should notice that the relationship of males in an objective task is to immediately recognize the value of each other. Therefore an automatic hierarchy of strength and competence is established.
In a female environment there is little strength or objective measures to use, so there is an organization based on alliances and social manipulations.

But for this to work it would be necessary to convince the males to share their resources with females, something that is not common in other species.

Nature already had two powerful instincts to work with:
– a period of heat design to initiate sex and reproduction at the most appropriate time of the year.
– an instinctive parental behavior to protect and provide for the young ones.

These instincts operate using strong endomorphin, that rewards the animal when following these instincts. The absence of these endomorphin gives a kind of “hangover”, or redraw symptoms.

What nature did was to combine both instincts, giving a permanent state of heat to humanity to force bonds between males and females. The second change was to infantilize females so that males could feel the instinct to provide and protect for females like they already did for children.

This infantilization can be seen in several levels:
– physical: they exhibit a smooth features, akin to a child features.
– psychological: their immature behavior resembles that of a child.
– vulnerability: they cannot defend or feed themselves, just like a child.

I think this theory explains the childlike nature of women a lot better than Schopenhauer idea of “women being more adapted to deal with children by being children themselves”.

We therefore can explain how men react to women. What we call “love” is just the natural instinct of providing and protecting. The more infantile and vulnerable women are, the more we “love” them. And the prize for “loving” women is sex. These two powerful instincts become entangled in such way that we say we “give it to her” with sex. “Give” what exactly?

Yet mankind evolved beyond the confines of his natural habitat. With civilization the concepts of civility, duty and marriage appeared, as tools for greater stability of society. With more stability, the more we multiply and prosper.
However, there is a side effect for civility. The law of the strongest has changed, now the strongest is the one that influences and makes rules for society.

And who is prepared to operate in these subjective, manipulative and alliance based environment?

Women.

Next post: The war between two different species

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

This is awesome.
I agree with it.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[ghostParticipant]

Great post.

Anonymous wrote:

And who is prepared to operate in these subjective, manipulative and alliance based environment?

Women.

As a man, I will never be inferior to a woman in any way, period. I will adapt and thrive. Nature has given me all the necessary tools.

[MACHOParticipant]

Very interesting read. Thanks

You must own a better Crystal ball than I

[Anonymous 5]

You’re right, and it’s all because of our giant brains.
Childbirth almost splits women in half because of the size of the head. They’ve had to evolve hips so wide they can’t even run properly.
Furthermore, brains take so long to develop they’ve forced females to a lifetime of stay at home care giving.

A woman’s only real chance of survival depended on her ability to extract resources from the tribe, and men. The tribe WAS her natural world.
She evolved soft skin, silky hair, curves, etc. Every bit of a beautiful woman is designed to attract men,,, but it’s a huge disadvantage for survival in a natural world, which compounded her dependency on men.

Usually it’s the male in the animal kingdom who evolves unnecessary beauty to attract a mate. It’s always a disadvantage, for example, the Peac~~~, antlers on a deer or colorful patches on a Mandrill.
But women are at home, not out in the wild. Beauty doesn’t make them sitting ducks. It increases the chances of the human female individual and not just the chances of them passing on their DNA. It’s a wonder there’s any ugly women at all.

[Anonymous 12]

Men and women have been pitted against each other in gender combat by the Socialists. Now, there have always been bad men and bad women that is for sure. But generally speaking in the past men and women worked together to build the society and countries that you now see being ripped apart.

[Anonymous 0]

Very interesting and educational post.
Keep them coming bro.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Men and women have been pitted against each other in gender combat by the Socialists.

That doesn’t explain why USSR was actually, in many ways, less gynocentric than USA.
Unless you’re suggesting that capitalism is socialism, and that socialism is not socialism…

Fact is that the reasoning by Manfred applies to both capitalistic societies and socialist societies: even a socialist society like USSR is a powerhouse compared to primitive tribes, capable of creating an enormous surplus compared to primitive tribes.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[DirtBikeManParticipant 535]

Spot on analysis, and a great read. Thank you.

Times they are a changing. Early human is so elegant in its design and synergy. Sad to turn our back to that teamwork. Some day pair bonding may come in handy again, but it will be a while.

The most important thing you can do is ask yourself, what do I really want out of life. Really think about it, and always be true to yourself. Then Do it.

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

man and woman are so different in behavior, values and interests, that they might be two different species altogether.

Actually, men and women are really like two different species, who can somehow create children together. Totally different body shape and strength and hormones and how the brains work and how problems are solved. It is clear when a man can understand his dog and his machines a lot better than the emotional rollercoaster of his girl”friend” .

[MonkParticipant 16975]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Unless you’re suggesting that capitalism is socialism, and that socialism is not socialism.

Socialism/communism = State corporatism.
Capitalism/fascism = the corporate state.

No difference. They simply use different slogans to arrive at the same destination.

I would guess that the USSR was less gynocentric because having already achieved the police state, they neither needed or wanted feminism. They just exported it.

[Branched offParticipant 10920]

Goof Topic, interesting angle.
Trail 428 makes a very sound point -it was the division of labour due to the big brains of humans that started the gender differences.
The gender differences and the need to do better for a hypergamous mate -as opposed to just attract a mate and beat up your rivals till you get to impregnate her are probably what drove humans to evolve more and more complex technology -men were engaged in a race to do one better against other tribes and even within their own tribe.
Even though women pushed men to race to do better, men knew they needed each other to hunt, then farm, then make industry. Men learned to cooperate with each other and look after each other, even their rivals so that all could do a little better. This is quite different from the female approach which is to be very nice to people to their faces (until you can’t help it and flip out), while always slagging even your friends off behind their backs and trying to get one up on every other woman you ever meet.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[Anonymous 3]

Branched off,

Great description!

[Anonymous 3]

About that socialism / capitalism debate, I guess both of the words have lost their original meanings long time ago. Original ideas may have been to cooperate and give some help for the people in trouble, and for capitalism that is about efficiency, productivity, and enjoying the results of that, and that kind of stuff. Nowadays, socialism seems to mean that some lazy people can get away with unwilling to do anything useful at all, and capitalism seems to be just about making the most money with the least effort in the shortest time, cheating on taxes wherever possible, not care what the side effects of anything are. That’s how sugar filled gentically engineered plastic food and cheap but bad quality short lifetime products, and ad-filled webpages and poorly designed unsafe fancy looking software reach the market.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Monk wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Unless you’re suggesting that capitalism is socialism, and that socialism is not socialism.

Socialism/communism = State corporatism.
Capitalism/fascism = the corporate state.

No difference. They simply use different slogans to arrive at the same destination.

Good analysis.

Monk wrote:

I would guess that the USSR was less gynocentric because having already achieved the police state, they neither needed or wanted feminism. They just exported it.

I think that the USSR was less gynocentric (it was still gynocentric, but less than the west) mainly due the lesser western culture within Russia: the west is particularly gynocentric due the influence of Middle Ages chivalry / Romanticism gallantry – there isn’t something similar in other cultures like, let’s say, Japan, China, India or Arabs.
Still, the above cultures are gynocentric in many ways, but all them much less than the west.

I don’t think that USSR exported feminism: in the eastern bloc there was opposition against western feminism, this is particularly clear in regard to DDR, the East Germany: the government line during the 60s-70s was that the western feminism was pure man-hating and the women’s groups were checked by the Stasi as a potential threat. It’s almost the same nowadays in China.
I think that the eastern bloc prevented a lot of the worst feminist developments by giving, immediatly, to women equal rights and almost equal responsibilities – the latter is unheard of in the west: it would be like giving to women the vote and, at the same time, forcing them to sign for the draft – that wasn’t achievable in the west due the deep chivalry roots.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts