The Idiocy Of Political Correctness Knows No Bounds

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

http://www.insidescience.org/blog/2015/02/20/macgyver-modern-age

 

Just what we need:  a female MacGyver…..

 

[RennieParticipant]

These people are cultural vandals, they aim to destroy our most cherished icons by making a mockery of them, just like they’ve done with the art scene.

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

Rennie:

 

True.  Imagine the outrage if a Hollywood studio wanted to re-make, say, Contact, and made the lead character a man.  (By the way, I liked the movie.  Jodie Foster gave a good portrayal of a scientist.)

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

Women have been screeching, and many men have been agreeing for decades that women are equally abled as men and theoretically would have accomplished as much but have been oppressed by the patriarchy which prevented them from doing so. Now that they are over represented in colleges, I’m wondering where all the female accomplishment is? Where are the all female moon landings? Where is the female-designed SR71? Where are the equivalence to radio, telephones, airplanes, steam engines, artificial hearts…?

I’m waiting for the ladies to show me their equality. So far, it seems like kind of a joke. And the longer we go forward with this feminist idea of equality, without any accomplishments that approach parity to the accomplishments of men, the more ridiculous it looks.

When I was a boy, I was told by feminist mother and sister that women could do anything a man could do. (my father took me aside and quietly told me that ignoring them was easier than trying to shut them up). Ironic that 40 years later, I learn that they are making tv shows about women acting like they are doing what men have actually been doing all along. 40 years of feminism has produced women pretending to be able to do what men have actually already done.

The most telling thing here is that women will call this show a drama… and to men, it will be comic. 🙂

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[RoyDalParticipant]

Another TV show for me not to watch. Whatever will I do with all my free time?

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 14]

I really really really do hope the world gets destroyed before former US President and incumbent Her Royal C~~~ness Queen of the World Hillary RodHAM Clinton passes the law that every living male, under the penalty of death, must have a sex change op.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

If you want to see what women in power would do just look at our current administration. Obama might as well be a she, he’s responsible for taking away college mens civil rights and all the other feminist crap that has come out in the last 6 years.

This is what feminism looks like: Cut funding for medical research, cut funding for defense research and development, cut funding for NASA now we have to hitch a ride on the Putin express to get into space. There are no new building projects and we have no clear direction of improvement of our nation. No leadership.

It takes a village. It takes a village to be taken over by Isis and beheaded.

This is exactly the form of government desired, voted on and produced by our feminist overlords of whom Obama is the leader (disclaimer, I don’t dislike the guy, these are just facts). We are more concerned with getting vagina’s in STEM jobs whey will hate and leave as soon as the “anchor to the house” baby comes. Half of the British health system are female and most of those leave by the end of their 30’s, wasting all the public money to train them and leaving the health care system in a disaster.

This is the marxist agenda. They are taking all that money that in progressive circles has always been considered a waste resources to give free food, clothing and shelter to women who would, in the past, contribute to society if not professionally in terms of turning out well adjusted well educated children.

If women and their political allies keep it up with their political correctness we’ll all be living in huts like before ancients invented civilization. This is known by our feminist overlords. They just figure men will keep slaves to the smelly clam shell.

Not me, I’m done, I’m MGTOW till the end.

Here’s a quote from a famous feminist:

“If civilization had been left in woman’s hands we would still be living in grass huts” Camille Paglia

Well, men have folded, women rule the english speaking countries and once Hitlary comes in she will be the first world president since all politicians, male and female are feminist todies. If you think things are bad, wait for Hitlary. It will be a level of misandry that we can not even imagine.

Best to go our own way, keep our advantages, let women and their pussy begging manginas go back to living in grass huts. I guess we’re entering a new dark ages. Someone has to keep culture alive, that will be MGTOW, the only group with the b~~~~ to say: NO MORE!

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

In the United States, minimum admission scores for the medical school entrance exams are lowered for women in order to produce a medical school class that is 50% women. 5 years out of residency training, the fraction of those women still practicing medicine full time is 35%. So if we project that we will need 12 full time doctors in 15 years, we have to create a class of 18 students: (9 male, 9 female) so that in 15 years we can have 9 full time male doctors and 3 full time female doctors…because equality. The tuition paid by medical students covers about 20% of the cost of educating them. The rest comes from the tax based government education budget.

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[…Spectator 1165]

HRP: spot on. BP: i’ve read the same thing RE women in military service. they actually made basic training “sensitive to women’s issues.”

[John DoeParticipant 743]

The point of political correctness is not to be correct, but rather to control.  In that respect it doesn’t have to make sense.  It is about subjugating a population that lacks the ability for critical thinking and self reflection due to the control of its base appetites.  Women run off of appetite, that is why feminism seeks to put them in charge.  Political correctness would not work in a society in which men are in charge.

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

Don’t even get me started on what’s happened to my own profession, engineering.  Add to that malarkey like the feminist outrage at the Math Barbie doll that said:  “Math class is tough!”, or something like that, from about 20 years ago.

 

I am so glad I’m off on my own.  I don’t have to deal directly with such hogwash, horsefeathers, and codswallop.

 

[RennieParticipant]

BrainPilot wrote:

Women have been screeching, and many men have been agreeing for decades that women are equally abled as men and theoretically would have accomplished as much but have been oppressed by the patriarchy which prevented them from doing so. Now that they are over represented in colleges, I’m wondering where all the female accomplishment is? Where are the all female moon landings? Where is the female-designed SR71? Where are the equivalence to radio, telephones, airplanes, steam engines, artificial hearts…? I’m waiting for the ladies to show me their equality. So far, it seems like kind of a joke. And the longer we go forward with this feminist idea of equality, without any accomplishments that approach parity to the accomplishments of men, the more ridiculous it looks. When I was a boy, I was told by feminist mother and sister that women could do anything a man could do. (my father took me aside and quietly told me that ignoring them was easier than trying to shut them up). Ironic that 40 years later, I learn that they are making tv shows about women acting like they are doing what men have actually been doing all along. 40 years of feminism has produced women pretending to be able to do what men have actually already done. The most telling thing here is that women will call this show a drama… and to men, it will be comic.

I was once forced to watch a horrible movie set in the 1800’s, where the main character(a female doctor) had a really bad attitude to men and taught the younger girls “women can do anything a man can do” and this was supposedly a christian movie. The corruption that is feminism knows no limits.

[HimeoParticipant 471]

BrainPilot wrote:

When I was a boy, I was told by feminist mother and sister that women could do anything a man could do. (my father took me aside and quietly told me that ignoring them was easier than trying to shut them up). Ironic that 40 years later, I learn that they are making tv shows about women acting like they are doing what men have actually been doing all along. 40 years of feminism has produced women pretending to be able to do what men have actually already done.

This is the greatest thing I’ve read on this website. I wish I could upvote you more.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Aye, there’s the rub. “Women can do anything men can do”. Yeah OK, but DO they? We actually did a feature on that if you search at the very top.

For example, men have been fighting fires and kicking footb~~~~ since god knows when. Men are actually DOING it and they don’t make the front page. But a woman signs up to be a firefighter and this is BIG NEWS!!! A woman kicked a football and fumbled it up to an embarrassing degree… but made the front page just for “being the first woman to try out for the NFL”. Whoop dee f~~~ing doo.

They don’t ACTUALLY do what a man can do. They want special recognition just for TRYING to do what countless men before them have actually DONE. The hypocrisy is simply astounding. Refusing to acknowledge or revere the actions and accomplishments of men… while expecting front-page coverage, recognition and reward for merely TRYING it.

Ladies, it’s OK to admit men are better than you at kicking football and fighting fires. If you merely acknowledged their awesomeness of men from time to time, men wouldn’t laugh in your face when you make a complete ass out of yourself for attempting the same thing.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[…Spectator 1165]

Himeo: women are really slow on the ACTUAL doing and creating, but boy are they ready to pose and take credit for s~~~ even when they don’t what it actually is.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Like KeyMaster said, women don’t want to actually do these things.

But I think the reason they say “We can do anything a man can do” is to say to young men and women that “men have no value to you young women, men are redundant”.

They know they don’t have to tell young women whether they can complete with boys or not. Girls cannot compete in sports and leadership and all girls/women very keenly know this. They know men must be handicapped for a girl to beat them at anything. Girls know exactly where they stand. Women are very aware of all hierarchy’s they hate hierarchy’s and call it patriarchy when men are, inevitably the leaders. When the girl in question is the leader, alla “Mean Girls”, the hierarchy is the in thing and most important thing in the world.

So the feminists are not fooling girls. They are fooling boys. Boys have been raised to find girls mystical. One hundred years and fifty years ago people would call women and girls weak minded and emotionally unstable, and nothing has changed since then except the amount of anti-depressants prescribed (the word hysterical means out of control women lead by emotion): from before feminist hegemony, 1859:

A physician[who?] in 1859 claimed that a quarter of all women suffered from hysteria. George Beard, a physician catalogued seventy-five pages of possible symptoms of hysteria and called the list incomplete;[4] almost any ailment could fit the diagnosis. Physicians thought that the stresses associated with modern life caused civilized women to be both more susceptible to nervous disorders and to develop faulty reproductive tracts.[5] In the United States, such disorders in women reaffirmed that the US was on par with Europe;[clarification needed] one American physician expressed pleasure that the country was ”catching up” to Europe in the prevalence of hysteria.[4]

Women are well aware that their behaviour is erratic, illogical and is based on “feelings” not efficacy. This is the basis of feminist theory. In fact efficacy, like staying around as a nation, takes second seat to female feelings today. That’s why Hitlary has been going around the world as secretary of state fooling all the women around the world that if they just deny sex to their husbands all wars will end, all disease will end, all violence will end and we will live in happy nirvana of little female lead villages. And they believe her.

As a transdisciplinaryintellectual shift emerging out of the ‘textual turn’, it represents an intensificationof interest in ‘emotions, feelings, and affect (and their differences)’ as objects of ‘scholarly inquiry’ (Cvetkovich, 2012: 133). Challenging ‘the scientific superiorityof ‘‘detached reason’’ and ‘‘objective observation’’ over the emotional and thesubjective’ (Greco and Stenner, 2008: 5), theorists associated with the textualturn paved the way for a ‘resurgence of empirical and theoretical interest in emo-tions’ (2008: 5). Feminist scholars have been at the heart of these engagements withaffect, in part, because, for some, feminism itself is a politics ‘suffused with feelings, passions and emotions’ (Gorton, 2007: 333), but also one that has long recognisedthe critical links between affect and gendered, sexualised, racialised and classedrelations of power.

From a speech Hitlary gave at the UN general assembly as secretary of state. A speech much hidden in the US press:

It is also a coming together, much the way women come together every day in every country. We come together in fields and factories, in village markets and supermarkets, in living rooms and board rooms. Whether it is while playing with our children in the park, or washing clothes in a river, or taking a break at the office water cooler, we come together and talk about our aspirations and concern. And time and again, our talk turns to our children and our families. However different we may appear, there is far more that unites us than divides us. We share a common future, and we are here to find common ground so that we may help bring new dignity and respect to women and girls all over the world, and in so doing bring new strength and stability to families as well.

By gathering in Beijing, we are focusing world attention on issues that matter most in our lives — the lives of women and their families: access to education, health care, jobs and credit, the chance to enjoy basic legal and human rights and to participate fully in the political life of our countries.

There are some who question the reason for this conference. Let them listen to the voices of women in their homes, neighborhoods, and workplaces. There are some who wonder whether the lives of women and girls matter to economic and political progress around the globe. Let them look at the women gathered here and at Huairou — the homemakers and nurses, the teachers and lawyers, the policymakers and women who run their own businesses. It is conferences like this that compel governments and peoples everywhere to listen, look, and face the world’s most pressing problems. Wasn’t it after all — after the women’s conference in Nairobi ten years ago that the world focused for the first time on the crisis of domestic violence?

I hear people always asking what Hitlary will do when in power and refuse to admit she has been announcing the above out loud, to female applause, for 6 years.

That is delusional thinking and it’s coming to your presidency soon. In thinking about it, maybe the reason so many women voted for Obama instead of Hitlary last time around was because they knew they didn’t want post menapausal mean girl with her finger on the nuclear trigger.

Men are not afforded such luxuries in our new totalitarian state with tv’s on every corner and spyware on every computer, even to the point of seeing inside your living room via your smart tv. Did you hear Hitlary mention men above? That’s because she has no intention of leading men. They are slaves to her.

Women are 52% of the vote and 70% of women voted democrat to vote Obama in. It is irrelevant what men think and women know this, especially Hitlary.

How do win this PC game. It’s easy. Don’t play. Leave the fems standing in the mud, trying to fix the goalposts, helpless. Then go play some b-ball with your buds before the fems turn the world into flattened glass over a missing dinner invitation.

Maybe that’s why Isis hates Hitlary and what she stands for and why Boko-haram, which means no western indoctrination to turn out women into used up sluts by the time their 17, is actually doing something to try to have a voice in how their children are raised.

So, more young american men will die so we can have slut walks in Kenya.

The horrors of the story 1984 took till 2015 to be realized.

Well it’s government workers what can you expect.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Anonymous 14]

BrainPilot wrote:

The most telling thing here is that women will call this show a drama… and to men, it will be comic. 🙂

BP man I wish I knew you irl..would you like to be my grandpa?(kidding)..I mean damn..spot on 😀

Every time I go downstairs to my mother’s(and sister who visits occasionally) domain to get something from the refrigerator or make myself something in the kitchen and I pass my mother glued to the television watching all those stupid dramas I stop to watch it for a minute, laugh myself silly and come back upstairs to my room still laughing.

I once saw a part of a drama series on my way back to my room with some tuna sandwiches where a bunch of disgruntled housewives fed up with the men in their lives decide to have a girl’s night out. So they go to a bar to hitch a few hunks where get drunk and start bitching about men which drives away the few men trying to get close to them. Get thrown out for throwing up and making a mess and then eventually get arrested for DUI with their husbands having to come and bail them out!!

[RennieParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Maybe that’s why Isis hates Hitlary and what she stands for and why Boko-haram, which means no western indoctrination to turn out women into used up sluts by the time their 17, is actually doing something to try to have a voice in how their children are raised. So, more young american men will die so we can have slut walks in Kenya. The horrors of the story 1984 took till 2015 to be realized. Well it’s government workers what can you expect.

I agree, can’t blame the muslims for being p~~~ed off that westerners are corrupting their culture and society with garbage and even being the ultra orthodox people that they are, even as bad as they can be, they know it’s wrong what’s being done.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

@ Ressie,

But I certainly cannot condone their methods.

They should just go their own way and let their women take care of themselves in warlord torn villages killing for anti-western, anti-muslem, anti-christian and basically fighting for power and money. Let those women buy AK-47’s and use their superior female nature to protect themselves.

They should leave the children alone.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[davParticipant 422]

HAHAHAH. That footy kick. Oh that made my day.

[Author]

Posts