The Future of Robot Women

Topic by Gref

Gref

Home Forums MGTOW Central The Future of Robot Women

This topic contains 21 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by RoyDal  RoyDal 4 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #14926
    +2
    Gref
    Gref
    Participant
    203

    I was watching some old Arnold Schwarzenegger films because he’s a boss. During The 6th Day there’s a scene where it shows his friend interacting with his hologram girlfriend.

    Many men are going their own way, deciding that interactions and relationships with women are very risky, painful, and  it’s better to avoid them completely. This got me thinking, sure we can survive without them just fine, but what if we could completely replace them? You see a big difference between men and women is that women expect their environments to adapt to them (at the expense of men) whereas men adapt to fit their environment. Men decided that the weather is harsh and caves aren’t much better, so we built houses. Men realized that we need to be able to communicate long distance, so we invented telephones and the internet. Men are now realizing that without the rigid sex and marriage rules of the 1800s women are incompatible to live with, so now we’re inventing our own women. Here are some examples of how they look today.

    You can chuckle at it and say “I wouldn’t f~~~ that.” I know I am, but what I do know is that technology improves rapidly. It’s not a question of if, but when we have robot women that are nearly indistinguishable from actual women. Look at how far computer and automotive technology has come.

    Cars now have air conditioning, collision detection systems, GPS, advanced on board diagnostics, and many other modern features. The Nexus 5  phone has a thousand times more processing power than an IBM 5150, and it’s much much smaller. I might not get to see robot women who are indistinguishable from actual women in my lifetime, but I feel good knowing that at least future men will.

    Well Gref, what about robot men? Will women no longer have a need for men?

    The answer is no because of how men and women differ in what they want in a partner. A man wants a sexy lady who is pleasant company and loyal, with pleasant company being as simple as not saying a word.  A woman wants a high status man with a c~~~y-funny personality, an iron will to with stand her mind games, and to fulfill her need for endless senseless drama. A robot man will never be able to fulfill her hunger for male power and dominance, the other things are possible but it’d take a million years to program an A.I. to withstand a woman’s mind games. Also the robots will have micro idiosyncrasies that men can easily overlook, but when was the last time a woman overlooked anything in her man that minutely bothered her?

    The only thing these future robot women will not be able to offer a man is true deep companionship, but we don’t f~~~ing need or want that when her companionship is being a bitchy, entitled, slut with no sense of kindness or loyalty. A dog and some good male friends will do me just fine thank you.

     

    The only thing better than these future robot women who cook, clean, are amazingly beautiful, never age, are amazing in bed, and ask for nothing in return is watching women’s reaction. The entire female gender will collectively s~~~ themselves when they realize they’ve been almost completely replaced. Easily more than half of the males will drop out of the dating pool all together because real women cannot compete.

     

    [url url=http://www.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/2d6337/i_was_divorce_raped_dont_be_me] I'm paying her 25% of my salary over the next eight years. I had to pay my lawyer, her lawyer, 50% of all my retirement funds and give her another few thousand dollars to make her go away. It cost me $20 to get married and will cost me over $220,000 to get divorced. [/url]

    #14932
    +1
    ....
    ….
    Participant
    305

    Sounds good Gref…I’m sure we all know women who we wished had an  “off” switch

    #14933
    +1

    Anonymous
    42

    Agreed Gref “A dog and some good male friends will do me just fine thank you”. Who wants a full size robobitch anyway? A pile of tin, wires, servos, actuators, cables, hydrolic pumps, hoses, pistons, accelerometers, gyros, passive radar, multiple CPU’S, vinyl, paint, and latex rubber. All to simulate a woman??????

    Hmmmmm….. Less complicated than a real woman….. You can fix it your self when it brakes….. You can turn down the volume….. You can put it in the closet when you go out with friends….. F~~~ that! Can’t they just make a simple pocket pussy? You know, something with a mouth on one side and a pussy on the other? Why bother going through all that research? I am certain the roboc~~~ like everything else will dramatically shrink. It will eventually evolve into the POCKET PUSSY ®, POCKET PUSSY 2 ®, and my favorite: the NITRO POCKET PUSSY 2 ® with optional stink finger/ball tickeler!

    #14940
    +1
    Ts
    ts
    Participant
    109

    Because men are mostly visual, a hologram may be good enough already. VR technology is already arriving and will change the entire landscape, just like the smartphone did before. For females the issue is their craving for attention, a smartphone solved that for them.

    #14951
    +1

    Anonymous
    5

    That is awesome. I look forward to sex bots.

    This sucks for female prostitutes though. They will lose all their customers when you can just f~~~ a robot woman in every hotel in the world and they charge it to your bill. The robot would be cleaned daily of course. No risk of STD’s. No bitching.

    We already have “Real Dolls” which are around $5000-6000 last time I checked. Plus the fleshlights which are super cheap.

    Women’s only thing to offer men(pussy) is pretty much phased out at this point. That is why I don’t care to bother anymore. If I need pussy that bad, I can just look up porn and f~~~ my hand. Sure it is not AS good, but it satisfies me enough.

    #14953
    +1
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    We were supposed to be horrified by The Stepford Wives. I know the chicks were. I always thought it was a good idea.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #15530
    In Which We Serve
    In Which We Serve
    Participant
    111

    I can foresee that if a realistic sex robot were ever available, feminists et al would be clamouring for its destruction.

    Here’s how they would do it. Concerns would be raised that men were using these to beat, torture etc and that there was a big risk that they would go on to do this to real women. There would also be concerns raised about kiddy sex dolls (and believe me, some sickos will be designing them already). There would then be calls for a ban or maybe just some kind of over-ride circuit that allows the dolls to say ‘no’ and shut down in certain circumstances.

    You could actually make a great comedy about this (somebody’s already posted a short comedy video about it on here) but seriously I think there will be major objections…

    One BIG objection would be of inequality. Eg, it’s relatively easy to create a sex robot for men. She just has to look good, act in a kind and pleasant manner, avoid drama, and give physical satisfaction. No robot could ever be created to satisfy a woman, because a robot has to work on some kind of logic.

    #15575

    InWhichWeServe:

     

    Feminists won’t necessarily want sex robots destroyed.  They could punish the male owners/users by infecting the operating system with malware, such as a feminism virus.  By doing so, the men could still have the robots but regret it.  (Think of the ending of I, Mudd from the original Star Trek series.)

     

    #15576
    ...

    Spectator
    1165

    have you guys seen this?

    #15697
    IronSoldier
    IronSoldier
    Participant
    55

    Sadly, I think In Which We Serve has it right when he says:

    I can foresee that if a realistic sex robot were ever available, feminists et al would be clamouring for its destruction.

    And they would succeed.

    How much technology already exists and COULD be mass-marketed, but is suppressed because it would threaten the almighty dollar?

    I don’t doubt that we could all have been driving electric cars YEARS ago, but the automobile lobbyists and the oil magnates wouldn’t have it because it threatened their respective industries.  F~~~, we could probably ALL be driving FLYING cars by now, but for the lobbyists who stand to lose money from it.

    Why are cigarettes still being sold?  Tobacco company lobbyists protecting their profits.

    Why is there so much s~~~, like preservatives and insecticides and green slime, in the food and drink we consume?  Big agriculture is profiting off our declining health, laughing all the way to the bank while we eat our way into early graves.

    Why has feminism gained the support of the media and managed a strangle-hold on our social structure?  Because wymyn are the biggest consumers and it behooves the mercantile industries to cater to them in advertising (which is what television is…the shows are just the filler between commercials, and are designed to keep wymyn’s interest until they can be told again what to buy).  Little do the mercantile magnates realize that they are now slaves to the wymyn they have freed and empowered, and the profits they will make off of the hungry wymyn consumers will go to the evil overladies that enslave them; they made a fortune promoting wymyn’s lib to increase their consumer base and profits, but they’ll hand over everything they’ve earned in the equitable distribution proceedings of their respective divorces.  F~~~heads.

    So, yes, we’ll develop femdroids, and they’ll be indistinguishable in bed from the real thing, but wymyn won’t let us make them obsolete like that, and they’ll have the backing of the deep pockets of the money-making industries they buttress with their reckless spending.  I don’t see a bright light at the end of the tunnel here.

     

    #15728
    +2

    IronSoldier:

     

    Meanwhile, feminists are dedicated to making men obsolete.  I’m sure that if cloning of humans became reality, they’d be lining up to reproduce by that method.

     

    #15782
    In Which We Serve
    In Which We Serve
    Participant
    111

    Personally I just can’t see these robots becoming a reality, largely for the reasons (very funnily put) in that comedy video. A realistic sex robot would cause all kinds of conflicts, not just with wives (who would eventually just destroy the robot or leave the husband) but with male friends, relations etc.

    What’s more likely I think is that virtual reality headset/body suits will become possible, with full sexual activity possible. There would of course be a similar outcry (about men using them to virtually molest children, torture women etc), but it would be much harder to control this kind of thing, as it would have non-sexual uses also (eg, for sports etc).

    #15784
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    @ListenUp! That video is laugh-out-loud funny!

    I still want a Stepford Wife (TM).

    EDIT: This post was nothing short of one grand spelling error. Any errors I haven’t scrubbed out of those few words are entirely mine. -RD.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #15834
    нσтησσв
    нσтησσв
    Participant
    830

    I personally discourage the thought of getting a replacement, because by doing so you are still admitting and even encouraging that you have an addiction to women to some degree.

    I see it as the difference between cigarettes and nicotine patches, or even cigarettes and e-cigs / vaps.

    Best thing to do is try out NoFapp, a concept that has been around forever 😛
    There are lots of benefits ( increased test levels, more energy, ect… ), plus chicks will be going at you from all directions due to significantly increased pheromone levels… all the more enjoyment from saying “no” 😛

    Only real downside of NoFapp is blueb~~~~/gigant nuts… which only happens if you are unable to have that wet dream every 2 weeks or however often you need one ( depending on your age and how long u’ve been doing nofapp )

    And there are plenty of side effects to excessive masturbation…

    My Goal: To Leave Society.

    #15882
    +1
    GoneGalt
    GoneGalt
    Participant
    361

    Well, I humbly disagree. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed f~~~ing women in my past, just not dealing with them outside of that activity. So if in the future I can buy/rent an android with no venereal diseases, a mute button, a slut dial, self-cleaning features and totally lifelike features that I could bang with a moment’s notice and put in the closet afterwards, HELL YEAH! I’m not addickted to them, I simply enjoy the recreational sex. I guess I’m addickted to breathing, good food, good drink, good friends, good fishing, good hunting, good football games, etc – but it doesn’t mean that if I cannot f~~~ an android that my only addickted alternative is to put up with women. Nope. Rub one out with porn on a tablet next to the bedstand is a decent substitute and is a lot better than any handjob or blowjob I’ve ever gotten in my life. And what is so wrong about being ‘addickted’ to orgasms, anyway? I’m NOT addickted to women giving me them but I’ll be damned if I let people tell me what I can and cannot do to enjoy myself with respect to the old Johnson. I’m 58, I ain’t got that many more to rub out before I leave this mortal coil, and if that realistic android appears on the market before my exit you can be absolutely certain I’ll give it a trial run. 🙂

    Besides, masturbation is really good for your health …

    http://www.menshealth.com/health/health-and-sexual-benefits-masturbation

    “We are programmed, as best we know, to need orgasms,” says Gloria Brame, Ph.D., a clinical sexologist in Athens, Ga. “It’s a fundamental aspect of men’s health, right up there with brushing your teeth.” And the more you know about what satisfies you solo, the more pleasure you get from sex. You likely know that a little wanking won’t make you go blind or cause your penis to fall off. (Let’s face it, you’d know by now.) In fact, a little time alone is perfectly healthy for you. “It relieves stress and keeps everything about your body—your heart rate, blood pressure, reproductive system, brain chemistry—in very good shape,” Brame says.” A 2003 Australian study found that men who ejaculated more than five times a week were a third less likely to develop prostate cancer. Regularly flushing your system, so to speak, keeps your semen healthy and prevents the build up of cancer-causing chemicals.

    “Men are doing themselves a favor with regular ejaculation,” Brame says. “It cleans out the plumbing.” The researchers say sexual intercourse doesn’t provide the same benefit because it puts you at risk of contracting a sexually transmitted infection.

    #16034
    IronSoldier
    IronSoldier
    Participant
    55

    @Quarter Wave Vertical:

    You’re absolutely right.  And not only would feminists, in their constant quest to make men obsolete, be lining up to reproduce by cloning if they could, but so would men! And that, I’ll bet, is why cloning humans isn’t done.   I wouldn’t be surprised if it is possible and has been done successfully somewhere, but the technology is suppressed because of the threat it would pose to the social structure.

    #16101
    +1
    Stargazer
    Stargazer
    Participant
    12505

    The irony of the almost certain worldwide revulsion and fury of females against android sex surrogates for men is that you can walk into a very large and very well lit store in almost any major city and purchase one of a thousand different shapes, colors and sizes of artificial penises right now.

    I imagine there is a female in a sex toy shop this very minute attempting to buy a fire extinguisher off the wall at the end of a row of gigantic colorful, jiggly robotic dicks.

    #16102
    BrainPilot
    BrainPilot
    Participant
    7640

    Agreed docfenders,
    But women don’t like hockey, nascar, chewing tobacco or motorcycles and those things are still selling… so maybe there’s some hope for the female robot… ???

    Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

    #16105
    +1
    Stargazer
    Stargazer
    Participant
    12505

    Here’s the thing, BrainPilot… I think females don’t like those things but they secretly like it when men do them. Riding a motorcycle or being into sports makes a guy a “jerk” but these kinds of guys are always surrounded by females because… well I guess they like their guys a little bit al dente… rough and needing “a woman’s touch” to shape them up (and, naturally, make them boring).

    Put short, females like to find a wild stallion and then break him and turn him into a work horse. But sex robots… I think once there are practical automaton sex partners for men… well it would be like the stallions all grew wings and flew away. Females wouldn’t even be able to get their hands on us, much less attempt to break us and put a yoke on us.

    #16109
    +2
    BrainPilot
    BrainPilot
    Participant
    7640

    True doc,
    But women have become such insufferable bitches that the stallions are starting to fly away anyway. New members finding their way to this site everyday, and there are no female robots here. The preference order is starting to be 1st choice: fem-bot, 2nd choice: nobody, Last choice: Women

    Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 22 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.