The first Ghostbusters Review is here, and we're right.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

Someone managed to go to a pre-screening of the film, and this review is worth looking into fully, because it shows exactly what’s wrong with feminism in Hollywood today.

The review has some spoilers, but come on guys, were you really going to see this film?

The professional review screening for this film for websites like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic was also moved to the day of the film’s release date. That spells bad news for the film.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

sad thing is that women are always talking about not being judged for being women. They always talk about how they want to be judged like men, on their own merits and not the merits of women. But the minute they are judged the same way men are, and they fail spectacularly, they cry misogyny. The only reason it’s bad or view as bad is because they are poor weeemiiin and the world is out to get them. No, you got judged on your merits, those merits sucked, and you can’t handle that you aren’t a special snowflake, and resort to what all women end up doing, laying down and crying.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

I thought the first one was idiotic. No F’ing way I will watch one filled with feminist horses~~~.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

We all knew it was going to be garbage.

I’m interested to see if the Cuckstream Media give bulls~~~ reviews for this out of fear of upsetting the feminists.

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

Silverstone the Second wrote:

sad thing is that women are always talking about not being judged for being women. They always talk about how they want to be judged like men, on their own merits and not the merits of women. But the minute they are judged the same way men are, and they fail spectacularly, they cry misogyny. The only reason it’s bad or view as bad is because they are poor weeemiiin and the world is out to get them. No, you got judged on your merits, those merits sucked, and you can’t handle that you aren’t a special snowflake, and resort to what all women end up doing, laying down and crying.

Hammer. Nail.

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[AmongstMenParticipant 129]

Feminists are shooting themselves in the foot, they’re making their agenda way too obvious in the industry now. Four female heroes and a male secretary? How the hell does this stuff sell to the family unit and what message is it going to send to the youth?

Bad domino effect, but it’s not like it’s not been happening covertly for the past few decades anyway. My guess is, the leftist mainstream media outlets are going to reframe the critical backlash toward the movie as “men being sexist bigots who aren’t ready to have proud independent women as the stars in male-driven movies” and therefore, have a justification to push out more movies just like this in the name of “oppression”. They’ll keep doing it and silencing people freedom of speech with political correctness until it becomes the norm.

The world we live in…

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9645]

Well there you have it from the point of view of someone who did watch it. So according to him, the movie makes women look loud and stereotypical and men look like assholes while using crappy special effects. Four women use proton packs to shoot a male ghost in the b~~~~. That’s a F~~~ YOU moment.

We knew the movie was going to be s~~~, but this time we get it from someone who saw it, and to me that’s creditable.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Apparently it’s SO BAD there is actually a “review embargo” until opening day. It must suck so badly already….. that saying it sucks before it has a chance to even OPEN isn’t even permitted.

Face it SONY® pictures, you f~~~ed up.

REMEMBER YOUR PIECE OF S~~~ TRAILER FOR “NO MEN BEYOND THIS POINT??”

You and Ghostcunsters deserve to crash and burn.

—

The trailer was the worst in youtube’s entire history. The movie sucks. But we’re gonna review it because we’re not gonna see it. You couldn’t even spell the title correctly. GHOSTBUSTERS is the 80s original with Bill Murray and you will NEVER replace it.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Ned TrentParticipant 4894]

Keymaster wrote:

Apparently it’s SO BAD there is actually a “review embargo” until opening day. It must suck so badly already….. that saying it sucks before it has a chance to even OPEN isn’t even permitted.

Now that’s what I would call excellent news, people. It seems like they willingly “overstretched the bow” no matter the consequences. Well, in that case let ’em face them full scale … … errrm whooops.

I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22636]

I wonder how far the producers will double down. Accusing everyone that did not like the movie of bigotry than admit they made a bad film.

This bad comedy is become a farce.

[sidecarParticipant 35872]

No matter how badly it fails they will still call it a success. Even if it only takes in $10 million they will still call it a success. Even if it’s in and out of theaters in a single weekend they will still call it a success. And they’ll crow their “victory” over “sexists and bigots”.

Because since when have feminists ever admitted the truth anywhere?

At most they will blame the film’s lack of success (because they won’t ever be able to say failure) on the audience. And a sequel, which is already greenlighted, will be made. And that will fail so hard that only the makers won’t be able to admit it, because no review embargo will prevent people from remembering this pile of crap and avoiding the sequel.

From what I’ve seen this crap is such a career killer that unless they have the current cast locked into an iron hard contract for the sequel, they’ll have to shell out major dollars to shove it through production. Which will only make it fail harder at the box office.

[ChuddoxParticipant 585]

Faust For Science wrote:

I wonder how far the producers will double down. Accusing everyone that did not like the movie of bigotry than admit they made a bad film.

This bad comedy is become a farce.

They’ve already doubled down on this:

The Youtube vide contains other worthwhile links on the topic that further expands on their research.

This movie is a disaster of feminist propaganda. The TL:DR –

1) The original cast was strong armed into appearing in cameo.
(They were going to sue Murray, and Akyroyd)

2) The original director, Ivan Reitman, was forced into a “Marquee Only” producer credit.(I’d ask it be removed)

3) The Director is an effeminate “Feig” with none of the talent or respect for the paranormal that Raimi, or Akyroyd had when they wrote the (original’s) script

4)The actresses acted like typical Diva’s. They were absolute c~~~s toward each other and a lot of effort was wasted placating them

5) Sony deliberately deleted all credible criticisms about the film from its main page, leaving only the “sexist” remarks so it could cry “Misogyny”. They led a focused campaign against male detractors while all but ignoring female naysayers.

6) They attempted more “male oriented” marketing by releasing ads that don’t even feature the women at all, and they still flopped, because s~~~ movie is s~~~.

7) The c~~~ responsible for all this, Amy Pascal, lost her executive job (rightly so), but is still ‘credited’ as a producer.

8) 0 positive social media support from any cast or crew other than what seems to be contractually obligated. Even these seem scripted and forced.

F~~~ this movie, and f~~~ Sony for pandering to the wants of vapid c~~~s like Feig, and Pascal. You should have left it to Reitman and Akyroyd to do it the way they wanted. This movie is going to cost you a bundle, and I hope you f~~~ing CHOKE on it.

“Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

I really hope it pulls an Emma Watson and earns $61, but that priceless result is once in a millennium bad. I could make a movie on my phone and make more than $61. aaahhh ha ha ha ha ha ha

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[AnthonyParticipant 2281]

So this movie ends with the GhostC~~~sters shooting a ghost’s b~~~~. And feminists wonder why they’re movie is complete and utter s~~~?

After the movie airs, I hope Sony and this film dies a horrible death. Social justice warrior retards poison everything they touch.

Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

[ConstantineParticipant 4420]

Silverstone II wrote:
sad thing is that women are always talking about not being judged for being women. They always talk about how they want to be judged like men, on their own merits and not the merits of women. But the minute they are judged the same way men are, and they fail spectacularly, they cry misogyny.

Yes.

Faust for Science wrote:
I wonder how far the producers will double down. Accusing everyone that did not like the movie of bigotry than admit they made a bad film.

Yes, yes, YES!

I hate that these f~~~heads are bullying people into enjoying their crap. What happened to the days when if a movie was s~~~ty, you were allowed to say so? If it’s a bad movie, then it deserves to be said: it’s a bad movie. We should all be entitled to our own opinions, and it’s not fair to force audiences into liking a poor film just because the weemins say so. For Christ’s sake, this is what growing up is all about: accepting that not everybody is going to like what you do. I’m currently in the middle of writing a novel myself, and accept the fact that not everybody is going to like it. It’s my first one, so it won’t be flawless. But if I get bad reviews, I’ll move on and try something else. I’m not going to demand that the rest of the world changes their opinion because it hurts my feelings when they act like big meanies.

That’s thought control, is what that is. Look at how many crappy movies Michael Bay has made. I was never a Transformers person, I thought that those films were awful – the ones that I could be bothered seeing, anyway. Now imagine if the next Transformers sequel created a similar campaign. If the ads basically read, “Watch this movie or you’re a man-hater!” If Michael Bay began doing interviews where he said, “If you don’t like my movie, you’re a narrow-minded bigot who can’t handle a strong man!” Can you imagine how lame that would be? And would you really see anybody, men or women, going along with it?

F~~~ them all. The sad thing is, I used to like Kristin Wiig, back when she was on SNL. For a female comedian, I didn’t think that she was too bad. Her Kris Jenner impersonation was great. But I won’t be watching her stuff anymore.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[solitudeParticipant 346]

Taking the bigotry stance only makes the directors and cast look worse.

Had no problem watching The Hunger Games or other films/television shows with a female lead.

[Ned TrentParticipant 4894]

So in summary of all this, the movie still got one chance —> to get the “golden raspberry” (as in the opposite of the oscar) 2016.

I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22636]

Chuddox, thanks for posting that video. The video documents how an absolutely brilliant idea and plan for a movie was turned to s~~~ to appease a small group of people.

If there was a working script for Ghostbusters: Alive Again. I would like to read it.

Constantine wrote:

I’m currently in the middle of writing a novel myself, and accept the fact that not everybody is going to like it.

That is nice to know. I wish you luck in crafting your story.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

I really can’t stand Paul Feigs as a director so i would still think the re-boot was a complete pile of s~~~ even if he had casted all male actors.

He’s also a complete pussy for pulling the mysogyny card. He clearly doesn’t believe in the strength of his own work and is setting up a fall guy to blame for his own failings if/when things go pear shaped.

[Anonymous 0]

Not that long ago I was an ignorant bluepill. I would never have clicked on a review for this movie as I think they were all s~~~ movies, well, maybe just not to my taste. Anyway, since enlightenment I am finding myself interested in following the extent and direction our culture is heading so I clicked on this review.
This review has added to my feeling that sometimes I feel like I’m living in a parody- a really bad b-grade movie. . In the meantime I will enjoy watching this movie disintegrate whilst those around it no-doubt sing its praises. Kinda like the emperors new clothes.

[Author]

Posts