The economics of sex

[Masculine_ManParticipant 2735]

This was an interesting article regarding sex. Here is the link:

The Economics of Sex

The part that caught my eye was the following: “The “price” varies widely. But if women are the gatekeepers, why don’t very many women “charge more” so to speak? Because pricing is not entirely up to women. The “market value” of sex is part of a social system of exchange, an “economy” if you will, wherein men and women learn from each other—and from others—what they ought to expect from each other sexually. So sex is not entirely a private matter between two consenting adults. Think of it as basic supply and demand. When supplies are high, prices drop, since people won’t pay more for something that’s easy to find. But if it’s hard to find, people will pay a premium.”

Exactly what I have said all along. We create this demand. If we don’t get it what is the absolute worst thing that will happen? We self service? Think about the strides we would make if every pussy beggar stopped begging. Stop validating attention whores, stop complimenting them.

This next piece is wonderful:
“Sex is her resource. Sex in consensual relationships will happen when women want it to. So how do women decide to begin a sexual relationship? Pricing. Women have something of value that men want…badly, something men are actually willing to sacrifice for. So how much does sex cost for men? It might cost him nothing but a few drinks and compliments, or a month of dates and respectful attention, or all the way up to a lifetime promise to share all of his affections, wealth, and earnings with her exclusively.”

Again if you don’t play, the price will be driven down just like anything that’s worth money.

This part is golden:
“Women actually have a greater capacity for sexual desire than men do… society has just trained them out of acknowledging it. The idea that women are less sexual than men is not only cultural, but recent; before the Age of Enlightenment, western society from the Hebrews to the Greeks to Renaissance Europe tended to view women as almost overpoweringly lustful and needing to be reined in by marriage, lest it drain men of their life’s essences”

I’ve always stated women are sex machines. Go in any sex shop and count how many toys are geared for women. Then count the ones geared for men. Make no mistake, women want sex more than men and the desire gets worse with age.

Last piece: “The blunt reality is an economic one. Women vastly outnumber men in the marriage market, which means men can be picky and insist on extensive sexual experience before committing. Men are in a position to maximize their rewards while investing fewer resources. Why do they do this? Because they can.”

Fellas this is true especially when you look at major cities on the east coast. This is not the case when you go to places like LA or along most western state areas, you can still fix this by taking yourself out of the game. Ensure they get nothing.

If it costs you your peace of mind, then it is too expensive.

[Anonymous 42]

Masculine_Man wrote:

needing to be reined in by marriage

Marriage is dead, women murdered it, women went wild. Market closed, storefront boarded shut, not for sale, not for lease. End of story.

Masculine_Man wrote:

Fellas this is true especially when you look at major cities on the east coast. This is not the case when you go to places like LA or along most western state areas, you can still fix this by taking yourself out of the game. Ensure they get nothing.

Please explain these demographics,, East coast liberals are somehow worse than west coast liberals? I know I’m in a hot bed of feminism’s furious frenzy, around here you go to 911 jail, no if and or but, two people fighting swinging dick goes to jail, meanwhile three holer gets a security blanket with care package.

Just last week one of these three holer 911 fanatical SJWs summonsed her 911 prince to the scene of dogs locked in an air conditioned car in the night time, to keep the millions of marauding mosquito out. The cop knee-jerked to the woman’s defense in spite my logical and sound CHOICE.

you can still fix this by taking yourself out of the game

Fix what? yourself? Please don’t tell me wayward society, they’re dragging everything they can reach or touch to flaming hell of their creation, LET THEM BURN! FIXED!

[TuneoutParticipant]

I though this thread was about prostitution,lol

Seriously though from a purely economic standpoint if a man really desires the sexual companionship of a woman it makes more sense to hire a good escort for an hour rather than go through the extra cost and hazards of picking up or dating.

Thus the average woman has just lost her monopoly as the gatekeeper and price fixer.

God I love the free market economy!

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Let us talk about the economics of sex. Specifically, Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) rates.

If the 20/100 rule is true. That women only go after the top twenty percent of men. Then, there is a bottle neck that increases STD rates. In that by the math, women are four times more likely to have an STD than those of the 80% of the men not be sought after by women. But, by that same token, given they are having sex with multiple partners, the 20% of men sought after by women have sixteen times the chances of having an STD than the 80% of men.

Given how STD rates are climbing I believe there will likely be a mass die off due to hedonism within this century.

Society has been twisted and corrupted to reward the irresponsibility of women and punish the responsibility of men, that if you do not want to have anything to do with the cesspool we call the current state of western relationships. That is not only fine. It is a sane response.

More than likely, even if you did everything right in a relationship, you are still going to get destroyed by your ex and society.

A condom will not protect you from many STDs.

It is estimated that two thirds of all humanity have some forum of herpes/(HPV). Though, most of these infections are from none sexual sources. Still, a condom will not protect you from genital herpes, the craps, nor other STDs.

One cannot build a legacy on a faulting foundation such as this. So, walking away and having as little to do with society is the only responsible course of action.

[narwhalParticipant]

I tend to think of it as much deeper then just sex. It seems pretty clear that the institution of marriage was an exchange of goods and services. In marriage, a man was required to provide welfare for his wife and any offspring between the wife and himself. In return, the wife was required to provide obedience, loyalty, and offspring. It was a fair exchange as the man could not get these things without a wife, and woman could not provide for her own welfare. Sex was part of the exchange for the benefit of both parties, since both wanted the enjoyment, offspring, and the bond of trust it helped create.

Relatively recently, that’s all been f~~~ed to hell. Because of modernization, women are more capable of providing for their own welfare. When they are not, or chose not to, they have the law and manipulation to provide for their welfare. At the same time, men are no longer given loyalty, obedience, or even offspring in marriage. In fact, women have twisted the views of society to the point where it’s considered wrong for a man to expect loyalty, obedience, and offspring from a marriage, yet still expected to provide welfare…even after the woman kills the marriage contract.

Sex is still a part of marriage, is still enjoyable, but quite often it’s a manipulation tool to extract resources and hardly a way of meaningful bonding. Sex is readily acceptable outside of marriage, because of birth control, women’s ownership of offspring and access to welfare, and despite the rise of disease. So sex is reduce to a pleasure experience only.

But if sex is just about a pleasure experience, it has new competition. A man, and a woman for that matter, can experience sexual pleasure without a partner. It lacks the bonding experience, but so does modern sex as well. Besides that, our modern society is loaded with non-sexual activities that sex must compete with for our time, finances, and efforts.

So, no s~~~, the value of sex has gone way down.

Ok. Then do it.

[experiencedParticipant]

These c~~~s are still trying to pretend like there c~~~s have value, sorry c~~~s, your c~~~s are not worth anything. Have a nice day

http://www.dmv.org/articles/images/2012/06/1984.jpg

vs.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=new%20cars&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=new%20cars&sc=8-8&sp=-1&sk=

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[experiencedParticipant]

Faust For Science wrote:

A condom will not protect you from many STDs.

this

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[DarkRyuParticipant 2354]

The value of vagina to me is $0. Actually, it’s negative because of the risk of pregnancy and STD’s. I might have sex, but she’d have to pay me quite a bit. To risk an incurable STD, even if the chances are only 1%, I’d demand $1,000,000. And I consider that cheap. Really, I’d like $5,000,000.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

narwhal wrote:

When they are not, or chose not to, they have the law and manipulation to provide for their welfare.

This is the core of the problem as far as I’m concerned. Traditionally men have been the providers, and women the nurturers. Why is it when a marriage ends the man is legally forced in many cases to still provide, yet the woman not forced to nurture? I’ve seen too many guys get whacked with outrageous child support amounts and alimony going to an ex while she does nothing for him after the marriage ends other than be a c~~~ over custody because the laws on her side and f~~~ other dudes in the house he paid for.

Forcing the man to still fulfill his husbandly duties after a marriage ends are the equivalent of forcing a woman to still cook, clean, and have sex with a man post divorce. Women wouldn’t think that was fair at all, but the certainly have no problem having the vaginal advantage in custody battles and getting a disproportionate amount of child support, alimony, and assets in divorces.

F~~~ marriage.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

DarkRyu wrote:

The value of vagina to me is $0. Actually, it’s negative because of the risk of pregnancy and STD’s.

I completely understand where you are coming from. Sadly though…many men do not. I have plenty of goals in life that and unwanted pregnancy or catching an STD could completely wreck…do I really want to risk f~~~ing up long term goals I’ve been working on for years when I’m making good progress just for a few minutes of playing with a meat hole?

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

The economics of sex is going in recession.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Author]

Posts