The beta women??

[VarunParticipant 2981]

I have come across many discussions across the internet, and there is one thing that I’m

having a doubt about. Hope you guys can hep me clear them.

The beta women:

This is what one feminist had to say: “You’re only seeing the tip of the iceberg. Not all women are like that. There are some who work 24/7 to make ends meet. They have neither the grace nor the beauty, so they don’t have men pulling out chairs for them or taking them to romantic movie-dinner dates. They are discarded like garbage; unattractive, useless wastes;

some of them who’d never get to experience love unlike most women. The least you could do is be sorry for them and spare them your misogynicism.”

I forgot where I read this, and of course, the OP’s version was very different. But this is

the idea I had formed in my mind. I labelled them as ‘beta women’.

Here are my contradictions:

Firstly, I am not responsible that these women don’t get their ‘cut’ in the game of love, or in other words, the game of trapping a rich man to pay their bills. They are ‘ugly’? right. But I didn’t make them ugly. And am I expected to be sympathetic towards them? Do we get any kind of sympathy?

I believe that girls always have an upper hand in terms reated to our society (even more so after the advent of feminism), whether they are beautiful or not, just because they are ‘girls’. Just because they are ‘fragile’ and ‘weak’ and need to be ‘looked after’. Nobody looks after us (boys). We are left to fend for ourselves.

People are like “everyone has equal value in this world”

and the next minute, they are like

“The loss of one boy is not as significant as the loss of a girl.” (by loss I mean death of course) Where’s the equality in this?

And after that, I’m supposed to be sympathetic towards ’em betas? B~~~~! Those ‘betas’ are not realy ‘betas’ after all, ’cause they still benefit from the sympathies of being ‘weak’ and ‘fragile’, even though they might not be.

What are your thoughts on this?

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[007 (Reborn)Participant 1672]

Deep down, all women are manipulative by nature no matter how attractive they are. It truly is what’s on the inside that counts…blood, puss, cancer, deceit, and evil. The “beta” women are just un-polished turds man.

Pursuing Happiness and Freedom.

[RoyDalParticipant]

I think they are all like that; the NAWALT is a mythical beast, or such a statistical outlier that encountering one is in the same percentage bracket as buying a winning lottery ticket.

I agree that it is not anyone’s fault that they are not genetically endowed with beauty. There can be only one Best Actress Oscar winner, only one Miss America. All the rest are also-rans.

I also agree that boys and men are treated as disposable. The problem is so acute that Christina Hoff Sommers wrote a whole book about it (it’s in the books section of this site).

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I know it is tempting to believe but AWALT.

the fabled unicorn is like a mirage in the desert. You keep walking to it until you die.

Most of us at MGTOW.COM don’t hate women , we just hate how they act.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Varun wrote:

“The loss of one boy is not as significant as the loss of a girl.” (by loss I mean death of course) Where’s the equality in this?

This hen pecking is how women are kept in line.

There are many type many types of red and blue pills. For women, blue pill hell is social media. If they don’t contribute, they are taught they are less than nothing. When a woman takes a red pill, it is over social issues, such a social media, and she sees how shallow social media makes their life. Though, this does little when it comes to relationships between men and women, this is a step in the right direction.

On a related matter, I find it somewhat sad that when it comes to genetics and procreation, society claims that it is most important for a woman to pick a genetically superior man to have children with, when there is nothing further from the truth.

The truth is that the most important thing about procreation is women of genetic quality. Even ignoring any inherited genetic problems. It is the woman that carries the child inside them for nine months and it is the woman that has the most bearing on raising the child.

And behaviorally inferior woman will abuse their bodies while pregnant, endangering the unborn child. And she will likely neglect their child after he or she is born. Thus creating a cycle one weaker generation after another weaker generation.

While a woman of mental discipline will take care of their body and their unborn child while pregnant, and nurture their child after their child is born. Thus, creating a strong, or at least equal generation, after generation.

This is how civilizations remain stable.

The problem is that the welfare state rewards the lowest common denominator of women to procreate, while punishing women that that are successful and trying to make something of their lives, from having time to have children. Thus, we have one weaker generation after the next generation.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

even those betas, when they do get a man, will have that predatory instinct triggered. They’re beta because they don’t have opportunity, not because they don’t have the instinct.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Anonymous 1]

It is funny how these women pitty the ugly women that have to WORK for themselves, and do not experience “love”, but they ignore 2 little things:

a) those are the exception, and even then, I would call bulls~~~. Even the ugliest woman will have some man attracted to her. It will not be the me she WANTS, but as the saying goes: “in the land of the blind, who has 1 eye is king.”

b) when the MAJORITY of men goes through the same s~~~, the “help” they have is to be told to man up. There is no worry about sparing them from the “misandrists”. If those “beta women” are so desperate, why don’t they go for the less attractive, less successful men? Why don’t they “date down”? Why they don’t start making things for the less fortunate? Oh yeah, because they all “feel” they deserve Brad Pitt and the like. Men should improve themselves for women, but women get a pass, right?

Wrong.

F~~~ them, and NOT on the literal sense (that is what they want).

Let them woman up and if they end up being alone, that is their problem. Men have been going through this since forever and the majority of us managed to pull through. It is time to women start to be treated equally, and that means, the SAME LEVEL OF COMPASSION they have for us, we should have for THEM.

That is what I think, anyway.

Cheers.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Varun wrote:

This is what one feminist had to say: “You’re only seeing the tip of the iceberg. Not all women are like that. There are some who work 24/7 to make ends meet. They have neither the grace nor the beauty, so they don’t have men pulling out chairs for them or taking them to romantic movie-dinner dates. They are discarded like garbage; unattractive, useless wastes;

So in other words…some women have it pretty damn good in life because they can get by with their looks…but for those women not so lucky…they get treated like society treats men so we should feel sorry for them?

[Anonymous 3]

Women have expertly been manipulating men’s sense of fairness and sympathy to use conjecture and get themselves more privileges, usually by spewing utter bulls~~~.

For instance the claim that men will just divorce women in their 50s and marry women half their age as rationale for allowing divorce and for women to slut around. It’s bulls~~~ because women initiate 90% of divorces and have ratcheted up the divorce rate well over 50% with some estimates at 90% after 7 years, all while never being able to show men did that at anywhere near those rates or at all really. Everyone knows men are generally extremely loyal. And you have to wonder were these women themselves really keen to hop on 50 year old dick when they were 25 themselves?

Women will use a minority usually made up scenario to get all women an advantage at the current time.

You have to ask these women are they ugly themselves? Is that why they are so keen on this? Of course they’ll all say no, they’re “not like that.” And somehow at that moment they are being altruistic.

If they’re so altruistic, why don’t they find some virgin unattractive aging male and have sex with them? They won’t do that, suddenly the excuses come or the straight anger screeching how it’s their body their choice or that’s disgusting or some other crap.

Men need to start acting the same way.

I find aging and ugly women both disgusting. Actually I dislike all women in general, so I’m not even interested at all in this bulls~~~. But it is pure bulls~~~.

I guarantee you this, every post-wall woman was once young. Not every man was 6’+ (in fact 85% will never be or have been) or will have a six figure income or all that other crap.

But all woman will have been young.

So if they f~~~ that up for themselves, men should not have any sympathy. Don’t want to f~~~ up? Marry as a 16 year old virgin, and campaign to end no fault divorce, child support, alimony etc. But no woman wants to do that, because they all hate men and want to f~~~ over men with the power of the state every way they can. They can’t help themselves, it’s like eating and breathing to us, a woman’s desire is to destroy men.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Beautiful …. ugly … slim … fat … young .. old ..

They all have the ability … with one phone call …. to fk up a mans life.

I make no difference between a good looking or ugly tiger … they can both eat me.

[Anonymous 22]

Ugly and/or fat ladies are the worst of them all. While more beautiful women can still smile and be polite <sometimes>, the ugly ones seem to be continuously bitter about something as if they have some kind of a permanent chip on their shoulder.

It’s hard to be sympathetic towards them when their behavior is very poor.

[Anonymous 1]

ILiveAgain wrote:

I make no difference between a good looking or ugly tiger … they can both eat me.

This analogy… was amazing!

+1

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Question is, Why are the feminists trying to sell you this? Is it because men are leaving the plantation, is she seeing this herself? Is she getting worried?

Who cares, what she thinks.

Those c~~~s are now feeling sorry?

No thanks, I’ll pass!

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

AWALT, man. They are pitiful children who deserve neither love nor consideration in anything. And there feminists go again thinking men owe them something just because they are women. Too bad, we don’t owe them s~~~. If you haven’t know love, then I guess you need to WOMAN UP and try harder.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

The vast majority of women are beta, they are unatractive overweight incompetant parasites who exploit men because they are incapable of finding their own way in the world. Does this make them more deserving of a man’s attention? Does it even make them more pleasent human beings? It is often said that homely girls develop a more attractive personality as compensation, the same way the blind develop better hearing. Bollocks are they, in fact they tend to be even more bitter and twisted than the miss world wanabe.

Do wimin pay any attension to beta men? No they do not, so why should we pay beta wimin any mind?

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[hmskl’dParticipant 6413]

No matter who the woman – all it takes is for me to imagine her yelling at me with a scowl on her face and she is no longer very appealing. I don’t owe her anything – especially none of my time.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

Beta women are usualy even more f~~~ed up, bitter and neurotic than alpha women.

And do you see beta women working in the mines, shaking hands with the devil everytime the mine rumbles?
Or do you see beta women carrying 20kg bags of cement in construction work?

S~~~, they cant even change a tire in their car.

At least atractive women are good to look at.

I have no simpathy fow women, period.
Stupid, ignorant, lazy and worthless pieces of meat.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

I don’t think terms like “beta” are really applicable. I think it’s more a matter of being f~~~able versus unf~~~able. And when you consider all the hideous hambeasts waddling around with a train of little welfare dependents behind then you realize that women have to be really damn unf~~~able to be literally unf~~~able.

I think the figures runs something like 80% of women are having sex with 20% of men. So the bottom 20% of women are unf~~~able while the bottom 80% of men are. Right away you can see the double standard there. Then you consider the things that make a man unf~~~able are largely things he cannot do anything about (such as his height) while the things that make a woman unf~~~able are generally easily remedied (weight and hygiene).

So I see no reason why an unf~~~able (due to feminine double standards) 75th percentile man should have any sympathy for an unf~~~able (due to poor life choices) 15th percentile woman.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Yet another unoriginal piece of feminist fluff.
All this useless t~~~ did was change the word men to women, and go into full victim mode. Reversing what men have been saying for the last decade, and claiming it for those poor women.
I find it hard to empathize, sympathize, or even care about the petty mewling of the most privileged, protected, and spoiled creatures in the western world.
51% minority, only a woman would say that…f~~~ you
My personal experience has been that If I treat people like s~~~, I am treated like s~~~ in return. If I am treated badly, I reciprocate in kind. Pretty simple really.
They way these t~~~s go on about how bad it is to be a woman is embarrassing to our species.
How long will it be before history is taught names and accomplishments like Sara De Champlain was the founder of New France, Christine Columbus sailed for the Americas, Erica the Red discovered Vineland, Nicole Tesla invented AC, Nellie Armstrong walked on the moon, Rose and Rachel founded Rome?

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[AFTParticipant 2725]

Beer wrote:

they get treated like society treats men so we should feel sorry for them?

EXACTLY

Beat me to it, I should feel sorry because she gets treated just as bad as I do?

NO

She will never be treated as bad as a man, she will never get divorce raped, be treated as a disposable utility, do the dangerous physical work.

She will always be able to get laid, she may even be able to get resources out of a guy, so what if she can’t have a relationship with a handsome young guy, I can’t feel sympathy for her not having as much privilege as the next better looking slut.

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[Author]

Posts