" The angry white man"

[Anonymous 42]

ruben wrote:

That may not be perfect but doesn’t make them a woman. Without further evidence I’d give the kid a break.

Just my two cents.

In the second post she gave herself away as she hid behind the fig leaf lie.

Notice “towards us as men” in the line below, dual inclusive, a hallmark to someone lying, especially a woman, too many nails in the casket always splits the wood.

That was the bubble in the tire that popped for me…

CG27 wrote:

I thought it would be interesting to hear everyone’s thoughts on why they think so much of the world has discontent towards us as men.

[rubenParticipant 119]

This second post?

“Well after seeing this article earlier on today it got me to thinking about the growing trend of hateful behaviour towards men.

I thought it would be interesting to hear everyone’s thoughts on why they think so much of the world has discontent towards us as men.

But if you would prefer to shoot me down by brandishing me a tuna then that’s fine as well.”

If you are sure then fair enough. I can’t swear I see what you see though. Maybe your right, maybe your wrong but I’d hate to see men driven away for no reason.

[Anonymous 11]

Ruben, I’ve been called tuna more than once and again very recently too. It’s part of the experience as we have to be hypervigilant due to the tuna at the gates.

[Anonymous 42]

ruben wrote:

I thought it would be interesting to hear everyone’s thoughts on why they think so much of the world has discontent towards us as men.

Lets throw another spectrum of light on it and I think you’ll get my drift.

” The angry white man”

“The angry rapist man”

“The angry woman hater”

It starts off with a poke in the eye as women now do even in normal conversation, we’re dealing with the most arrogant snide women this world has ever generated.

I can’t differentiate the two, it’s like separating stink from s~~~!

Why not “the angry black man?” I’ll tell you why, because black men are part of their victim circle, so are any group of peoples they have enjoined to their fold.

S~~~ jumps off the page for me!

[rubenParticipant 119]

The article that was linked was horrendus as were the comments by “guardianistas” below it. It got me pretty angry yesterday. Just not sure the OP was trying to promote the views in it.

In any case yes, it was a truly vile article and backed by loads of broken morons in the comments.

[trader1913Participant 1577]

Anonymous wrote:

Why not “the angry black man?” I’ll tell you why, because black men are part of their victim circle, so are any group of peoples they have enjoined to their fold.

S~~~ jumps off the page for me!

Black women are the biggest social vampires on the planet; there are many black women that don’t date black men. They make up excuses but it all comes down to $$$. There are many black MGTOW that will tell you this.

I am not white and i can tell you that non-white women are extremely racist. They are always looking to jump up the ‘race ladder’. A lot of them don’t like marrying someone from a similar background, they want a man with a ‘higher’ background.

[UnbelievableyetnotParticipant 512]

Mentioning neo nazis before talking about the manosphere is a guilt by association fallacy: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy

and Kimmel doesn’t actually link to a study when he makes this claim: a Californian study found that 80% of divorcing couples got the custody arrangement that they wanted. Both of them. So we’re really only talking about 20% of cases, and of those 20% of cases only a fraction of them are like the cases that the men’s rights activists describe: he wants joint custody, she wants sole custody.

He links to this page: http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674212954

This is a – and I hesitate to call him this – “man” who wants you to pay $41.00 • £32.95 • €37.00
Just to be able to check his claims.

And as you probably guessed, his stats are false:
http://fact.on.ca/judiciary/spin.pdf

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Everything that Kimmel write is false. Period.
Everybody can check its (“its” not “his”) sources and verify: the most “true” statement by Kimmel is when it use stats from 1997 about rape: it use stats from 1997 in 2017 because within older stats rape could be committed just only by penetration and not by forced envelope, by so he can bash men for committing 92% violence by penetration. Fact is that rape by penetration is overwhelmingly committed by people with penis and rape by forced envelope is overwhelmingly committed by people with vagina: in example Kimmel rape its wife with its penis, but that doesn’t mean that its wife don’t rape Kimmel with forced envelope, too.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 42]

trader1913 wrote:

Black women are the biggest social vampires on the planet; there are many black women that don’t date black men. They make up excuses but it all comes down to $$$. There are many black MGTOW that will tell you this.

Hey 13, you’re not telling me anything I don’t already know, I worked in the hood and saw it myself. A black woman that lived across the street from our shop told us to “go back to your home in the suburbs”, hated us because we were white, regardless the fact we revived a rundown building and cleaned up the lot. Another got extremely offended because I moved her shopping cart, I read eyes and faces as good as any brother(black dude) I can speak and understand Ebonics (black lingo), I’m not a Lilly White white dude, I’ve lived on both sides of the tracks, I not a country bumpkin that doesn’t read people and susceptible to attack. The meanest black motherf~~~er in the city was a friend of ours, he had a reputation, he was 6’6 and weighed like 285, was armed all the time, we worked on his car, the loose ammunition laying around in the car was enough to reload 3 or 4 times! Bullets everywhere! Afterword nobody in the hood ever gave us trouble again. We used to bring our black friends we made at the shop to our “home in the suburbs” 10 blocks away! We shot pool in the basement until wee hours of the morning. Don’t ask me why white boys are hated so much, we’re people just like anyone else. It all stems from VICTIM HOOD! As the song says “bleeding inside each others wounds”, brother I’m Anglo Saxon/Native American, the most abused and annihilated peoples from two continents! Native Americans were also pressed into slavery but nobody mentions that! It doesn’t fit their customized self-serving p~~~ in my own coffee and cry narrative!

I just thank god I’m not one of the blind drinking self-pity as I cry and cry and cry and cry and,,, well you get it, same’o’ same ‘o’…

trader1913 wrote:

I am not white and i can tell you that non-white women are extremely racist. They are always looking to jump up the ‘race ladder’. A lot of them don’t like marrying someone from a similar background, they want a man with a ‘higher’ background.

That sir extends to ALL WOMEN! Every race, color, and size! I will say one thing, the black community suffered the most since the poor-me attitude was fed there first, now every f~~~wit feminist is looking for and fabricating any excuse to f~~~ing cry! The world has become fields upon fields of plugged in crying MATRIX BABIES! It’s become a global insane asylum! Why do you think I moved away from people? There’s more animals around my house than people! In my Vermont getaway the animals will bite, maul, and eat you! Lets just call cities CRYING BABYFIELD, USA 12345!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

~BS wrote:

Still hasn’t provided her take on the article. seems like she’s trolling, fishing for comments to add to her blog or something.

I read the member’s intro.

/forums/topic/its-good-to-be-home-2/

He’s a happy to find us and admits he’s glad to be here. Being in school …. perhaps he doesn’t realize over time, how sick-to-death men are of that constant kind of crap pumped out by outlets like the Guardian. And perhaps he hasn’t solidified his own take on everything yet.

But he understands “no wife happy life” and “the right to speak your mind”.

The most important part of having “the right to speak your mind” is understanding for every “right” one has, they also have the right NOT to.

🙂

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[trader1913Participant 1577]

Keymaster wrote:

I read the member’s intro.

A lot of men have bought into the nonsense that its all a cabal/conspiracy by higher powers to make men and women behave the way they are.

They think that hatred of men is all because of the feminists, marxists, globalists etc. But they do not know that Greek philosophers made the same observations 2000+ years ago that we are making now.

Aristotle viewed women as inferior in thought to men, but valuable in maintaining a society (pregnancy and child rearing). Plato said that it is not a woman’s place to meddle in a man’s affairs. Many philosophers viewed women as a vice for men that he should resist for his own good.

[Author]

Posts