Taboos & Kink… What’s the Attraction?

Topic by Stargazer

Stargazer

Home Forums Philosophy Taboos & Kink… What’s the Attraction?

This topic contains 7 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by Stargazer  Stargazer 2 years ago.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #707026
    +3
    Stargazer
    Stargazer
    Participant
    12505

    So I was having a half-drunken discussion with my still blue-pilled friend the other day and the topic came to people who call each other “mommy” and “daddy” during sex.

    My initial response was “Hey, whatever gets you off.” but then, of course, I had to think more deeply, which brought us to this idea.

    What’s the deal with kink, anyway?

    My friend made the argument that “Kink is about doing things that are proscribed by society. It’s about breaking traditional mores and doing something exciting and adding sexual variety.”

    My response was that if someone is psychologically and emotionally healthy, they can not possibly do anything “kinky”. Here is the logic:

    1) They would not give a damn what anyone thinks about what they do.
    2) They would only do things they WANT to do, never things they DO NOT WANT to do.
    3) They would only need try something once with any given person in any given situation to determine whether or not they WANT to do it again.

    THEREFORE

    The only time a person could possibly perform an action that THEY THEMSELVES thought was kinky would be if THEY THEMSELVES felt that they SHOULD NOT do it. To do something that YOU BELIEVE you SHOULD NOT do is a self-denial or self-destructive act and a sign of mental or emotional illness.

    My friend went BALLISTIC over this. Apparently it’s a problem to kink shame people. Maybe he’s into some self-destructive behavior himself that he is in denial about, who knows… but whatever it is, he was not having any of this definition.

    “NO!” he demanded… “It’s not a sickness… it’s about breaking SOCIETY’S moral constraints. It’s an act of self-liberation!”

    Well hey, Mr. Conflicted, if you TRULY BELIEVED that the thing you were doing was not immoral or unethical, then you wouldn’t give a s~~~ about society’s moral constraints. What, do you hire a dyke to give it to you up the ass just so you call your momma up and shock her with the details? That’s f~~~ing sick. If you want to get pegged because you’re into it, then why the f~~~ would you care to upset anyone else about it?”

    Let me hear your opinions. Kink… total bulls~~~ posturing for identity politics… mental illness… desperately trying to be offensive just for the sake of offending… or what?

    To reiterate: I believe that for something to be kinky, it has to be something that the participant themself believes to be taboo or forbidden, in which case doing it once is either self-destructive mental illness or indicates they don’t really believe it to be taboo or forbidden (therefore simply trying something new) and doing it more than once is either normal for them or self-destructive mental illness.

    #707027
    +3

    Anonymous
    54

    Dudes call a women mommy dureing sex??
    WTF.

    Dont they know.

    You can never go back home

    Hahah shheeess….

    #707031
    +2

    Anonymous
    0

    Nice work shining light on more blue pill delusion, in this case, so-called sexual taboos.

    They think they are “free” because they are so “naughty and unihibited.”

    Meanwhile, decades in debt and clueless.

    All part of the propaganda that includes consumerism, voting, democracy and every other form of idiocy that fakes people into thinking they are in control of own lives.

    Freedom of expression, etc. is one of the major propaganda tools. Look around and see how much advertising is now appealing basically to selfishness. There is a restaurant chain whose motto is “My Choice” with a picture of a woman so self satisfied she looks post-coital.

    The appeal is to make you feel like a close-minded bigot if you don’t endorse complete “freedom.” Wasn’t there a big deal about some movie a few years ago that was supposedley the most taboo, sexually explicit film ever? People loved the idea of it I remember but I can’t remember the name of it or it if ever went anywhere.

    #707042
    +2
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Secret Agent MGTOW
    Participant
    22507

    Your starting point is flawed, imo.

    The definition of kink you use from your friend is not fixed because its based on the relative morality in an ever changing society. What society shuns today could be accepted tomorrow. This is not how you gauge psychological or emotional health, basing it on ever changing, sliding moral relativity.

    Also if you are having sex with another person you better well give a damn what they think about what you want to do.

    Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

    #707080
    +1
    Vajra Varaha
    Vajra Varaha
    Participant
    1283

    Oh I don’t know….
    Tying her up, slapping a ball gag in her mouth, spanking the s~~~ out of her before using her mercilessly has its appeal……LMAO

    After all they silence us with gossip, file restraining orders, and rape us with the legal system.

    Turn about feels good! I may have issues, but I like my anger. Reminds me why I’m here and keeps me warm at night! LMAO

    Disclaimer: I’m only referring to consensual sex for anyone from California reading this tongue-in-cheek post…..:-)

    #707085
    +1

    Anonymous
    43

    part of the thing is knowing a secret about another person.

    #707100
    +2

    Anonymous
    12

    Your starting point is flawed, imo.

    The definition of kink you use from your friend is not fixed because its based on the relative morality in an ever changing society. What society shuns today could be accepted tomorrow. This is not how you gauge psychological or emotional health, basing it on ever changing, sliding moral relativity.

    Also if you are having sex with another person you better well give a damn what they think about what you want to do.

    I was going to say very similar. In today’s society not having tattoo’s and not wanting to engage in taboo/kinky sex or just casual sex is deviant behavior compared to the standard.

    Quick example, if nudity was the accepted form of getting around then someone wearing clothes would be considered deviant or kinky.

    I used to be on sites like Fetlife and those people despite claiming to be open minded and tolerant behave in exactly the same manner as the people they claim they hate. If you are not crazy kinky on those sites they will be very violent (verbally) against you.

    Funny thing is they are also being monitored and have to keep banning certain kinks because they are too extreme and dangerous.

    #707258
    Stargazer
    Stargazer
    Participant
    12505

    The definition of kink you use from your friend is not fixed because its based on the relative morality in an ever changing society. What society shuns today could be accepted tomorrow. This is not how you gauge psychological or emotional health, basing it on ever changing, sliding moral relativity.

    You’re right that mores change but I believe that is irrelevant. Laws change over time based on what actions a society believes should be punished. What is illegal today, however, may be legal tomorrow. Nevertheless, a person who deliberately breaks laws is a criminal.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.