Suprime court to review internet sales tax

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-12/bid-to-collect-internet-sales-tax-gets-u-s-high-court-review

U.S. Supreme Court to Review Bid to Collect Internet Sales Tax

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider freeing state and local governments to collect billions of dollars in sales taxes from online retailers, agreeing to revisit a 26-year-old ruling that has made much of the internet a tax-free zone.

Heeding calls from traditional retailers and dozens of states, the justices said they’ll hear South Dakota’s contention that the 1992 ruling is obsolete in the e-commerce era and should be overturned.

——I do between 1 to 3k in sales a year over the internet. Would like to ramp up to 10k or more one day. Hope no changes would not want to deal with tax records.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Anonymous 42]

Interstate taxation is unconstitutional, according to the constitution, but when did that mean anything?

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22510]

When the internet giants put a distribution center in a state, that is when residents may see certain purchases – those filled by them – are now charged sales tax. This does not apply to states without sales tax.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[DarkRyuParticipant 2354]

About f~~~ing time. I’m so f~~~ing sick and tired of not being able to find what I want locally. Frequently my only option is to buy something online and hope it’s not a cheapo piece of Chinese S~~~, just to waste my time returning it because it is. It doesn’t even matter how much money you spend on it. It can be expensive and still be a piece of s~~~. I want to f~~~ing SEE it and FEEL it before I buy it.

I just bought this entryway bench. It was $500. FIVE HUNDRED F~~~ING DOLLARS! And it was such cheapo s~~~, Kmart would have sold that s~~~ in the 90’s for $15 in their clearance isle. Shipped that f~~~er back ASAP and bought something I didn’t even like the look of off Craigslist because it wasn’t a piece of s~~~. The Craigslist bench only cost me $35 too.

[Anonymous 42]

DarkRyu wrote:

The Craigslist bench only cost me $35 too.

I get all my 10w30 heating oil on CL…

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Three years of law school, one full year of constitutional and and I don’t recall “obsolescence” as a reason for rejection of stare Decisis. Guess I missed that lecture.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

Three years of law school, one full year of constitutional and and I don’t recall “obsolescence” as a reason for rejection of stare Decisis. Guess I missed that lecture.

The original case was a company called Quill. They sent catalogs in the mail and people could order out of it. The state’s case was that the catalogs eventually ended up in the garbage in their state, so that gave Quill nexus in the state of North Dakota. The Supreme Court said that a mail-order catalog did not create enough nexus for the state to force Quill to collect and remit their sales tax.

If a catalog doesn’t create nexus, I don’t know how an internet website can create nexus. If Quill is overturned, it won’t be on the merits of the argument. It will be because the Supreme Court wants the states to have more money.

I’ve never stepped foot in North Dakota in my life. If I had a website, I’m not sure how they could say I have to collect their tax. Now imagine our Supreme Court in the US telling someone in some s~~~ hole country that THEY have to collect our state taxes and remit them. Or what? You have no jurisdiction over that person.

Order the good wine

[Author]

Posts