Spermjacking lawsuit

Topic by Monk

Monk

Home Forums Men’s and Father’s Rights Spermjacking lawsuit

This topic contains 7 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by Atton  Atton 2 years, 6 months ago.

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #544548
    +5
    Monk
    Monk
    Participant
    16979

    Precis:

    Man (wealthy) and woman go to clinic. Have one child by IVF. Remaining fertilised eggs frozen. Break up. Him in new relationship. Ex allegedly then forges his signature for release of fertilised eggs. She has baby in secret. Tells him on Valentines day. Man accepts child but sues clinic for £1 million costs of raising child. Woman denies forgery. Woman sued by clinic. Case ongoing.

    Source: Daily Mail “Father suing IVF clinic after doctors let ex use his DNA to have secret baby”. 21/07/2017.
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4714094/Father-sues-clinic-1m-cost-raising-daughter.html?ITO=1490

    #544554
    +5

    Anonymous
    5

    Why did he sue the clinic, but not the Savage c~~~?

    Vasectomy is the answer to all this spermjacking madness.

    #544556
    +3

    Anonymous
    42

    The morrow of this story is that women are responsible for debilitating legal expenses because they’re given any legitimacy at all.

    They should be treated like goats and horses and not spoken too, and forbidden from any legal transaction in nature.

    #544560
    +3

    Anonymous
    25

    Let me guess what the judgment will be:

    – claim denied. a man gives up any right to the sperm once he hands it over to the clinic and the female can do with it what she likes

    pussy pass granted

    the policy of the courts is that all costs of raising a child are internalised to the father. not the mother or some business

    hey look at that Kangaroo …

    #544561
    +5
    Monk
    Monk
    Participant
    16979

    Why did he sue the clinic, but not the Savage c~~~?

    Clinic is (allegedly) negligent, and has money/insurance. C~~~ probably has nothing anyway.

    #544621
    +1

    Anonymous
    18

    Why did he sue the clinic, but not the Savage c~~~?

    This is perhaps to bypass all the anti-male laws set up in your ‘legal’ system when a woman is sued by a man.

    Corporations have (supposedly) money and connections.

    And as @monk pointed out – she is likely broke.

    #544635
    Grumpy
    Grumpy
    Participant

    And the winner will be the lawyers first and foremost.
    The clinic’s counter argument will be maintained that since he did not inform them of the termination of the relationship (the “marriage”), nor take steps to void the contract between them (himself and the clinic) in a timely manner, It constitutes implied consent.
    Ergo they did no wrong

    There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

    #545147
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    Entrust your sperm to no one.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.