Home › Forums › Men’s and Father’s Rights › Spermjacking lawsuit
This topic contains 7 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by
Atton 2 years, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Precis:
Man (wealthy) and woman go to clinic. Have one child by IVF. Remaining fertilised eggs frozen. Break up. Him in new relationship. Ex allegedly then forges his signature for release of fertilised eggs. She has baby in secret. Tells him on Valentines day. Man accepts child but sues clinic for £1 million costs of raising child. Woman denies forgery. Woman sued by clinic. Case ongoing.
Source: Daily Mail “Father suing IVF clinic after doctors let ex use his DNA to have secret baby”. 21/07/2017.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4714094/Father-sues-clinic-1m-cost-raising-daughter.html?ITO=1490
Anonymous5Why did he sue the clinic, but not the Savage c~~~?
Vasectomy is the answer to all this spermjacking madness.

Anonymous42The morrow of this story is that women are responsible for debilitating legal expenses because they’re given any legitimacy at all.
They should be treated like goats and horses and not spoken too, and forbidden from any legal transaction in nature.

Anonymous25Let me guess what the judgment will be:
– claim denied. a man gives up any right to the sperm once he hands it over to the clinic and the female can do with it what she likes
pussy pass granted
the policy of the courts is that all costs of raising a child are internalised to the father. not the mother or some business
hey look at that Kangaroo …
Why did he sue the clinic, but not the Savage c~~~?
Clinic is (allegedly) negligent, and has money/insurance. C~~~ probably has nothing anyway.

Anonymous18Why did he sue the clinic, but not the Savage c~~~?
This is perhaps to bypass all the anti-male laws set up in your ‘legal’ system when a woman is sued by a man.
Corporations have (supposedly) money and connections.
And as @monk pointed out – she is likely broke.
And the winner will be the lawyers first and foremost.
The clinic’s counter argument will be maintained that since he did not inform them of the termination of the relationship (the “marriage”), nor take steps to void the contract between them (himself and the clinic) in a timely manner, It constitutes implied consent.
Ergo they did no wrongThere was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
Entrust your sperm to no one.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
