So What Happened to That "Do Women Love Men" Thread?

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Obviously it got deleted, but how’d it go down? Did the OP reveal itself as tuna? Just curious since its intro seemed legit.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[bladeParticipant]

I responded to it . Told him not to take it to heart and brush it of because he wanted the thread taken down . I think he was legit and not tuna . Went just after i posted . I tried telling him to just move on to another thread .

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[bladeParticipant]

Hey ghost . Don’t be a pussy and get back on here bro . S~~~ happens . Put that mgtow armour on .

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

I don’t understand why he wouldn’t defend, clarify, or correct his position. Didn’t seem to be interested in discussion at all. One poster called tuna and it went the usual “You are all so horrible and mean route.”

Whatever…

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Okay, thanks guys. He sure did seem to be taking it hard that someone was challenging his viewpoint. Didn’t seem like a tuna, just a bit sensitive.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[Anonymous 14]

I don’t think it was tuna, and I do feel he was misunderstood.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

The member requested the thread to be deleted. Honored that request because it was just one thread.

I PMed and explained it’s not a solution. The member also requested to be deleted entirely for a while including the intro – which I would not do – because that’s not cool and we’re not interested in reading and replying to have our time tossed away.

The member expressed that he didn’t “feel” welcome or at ease for asking the question and wanted to delete and start over at a later time. Said he was very disappointed.

But I don’t see how he didn’t feel welcome here. We even made him “MGHOW of the Day” on our homepage as well. He even wrote: “Thanks so much for the replies. I can’t describe in words how it feels to have other people understand how I feel and how I see the world.”

So I don’t know what warmer kind of welcome he was expecting.
It wasn’t very sportsman-like.

Perhaps he will realize we’re not that sensitive and he shouldn’t be either.

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t think it was tuna, and I do feel he was misunderstood.

I didn’t review it entirely and didn’t step in. At first it was just one thread, but when the member wanted to have the intro and account tossed too, I took a closer look and reached out to him.

The degree of sensitivity was a little “tuna” , but MGTOW are Lions and if you’re a Lion too, you’re not gonna have a problem. A Zebra will have a problem.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

Okay, thanks guys. He sure did seem to be taking it hard that someone was challenging his viewpoint. Didn’t seem like a tuna, just a bit sensitive.

I don’t know about tuna, but it sure went the victim route really fast. It seemed to think it was supposed to only receive feedback agreeing with its POV that it is up to men to earn enough to make women happy in a relationship, or some such BS.

What was up with the ego of it talking about its own “epic intro” and how we were all going to miss its great contribution? Seriously, who the f~~~ are you?

And if this was an indication of its contribution, playing devils advocate for women and their hypergamy and shifting all responsibility and blame on men for not earning enough… good riddance.
Seems really odd.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

I was writing this above before I saw KM’s explanation. ^^^

Thanks KM.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t think it was tuna, and I do feel he was misunderstood.

It is not like he wasn’t given a chance to clarify or explain.

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

I don’t think it was tuna, and I do feel he was misunderstood.

It is not like he wasn’t given a chance to clarify or explain.

True, but he had already been attacked, and not every kid/man that comes here is going to be able to come out of the blocks swinging when they are just looking for validation. These guys are not all going to be lions, if anything we should be here to help them FIND their inner lion.

[Anonymous 43]

no one loved the op.

it was a great question, and someone put a harpoon through it. IT was if a thought was forming, but needed help. I hope the dude comes back.

We being men will never experience how women really feel, or think. I believe the woman’s perspective of the world is vastly different than that of a man.

I took my answer and turned it into the how do women operate thread.

my own experience has shown women love what a man can do and procure for her, loving the man is not relevant/possible, germane a concern, has no place here…I don’t have a word here. It’s out of my experience, and I can =t verbalize it. women allow men in their presence in a close intimate way…is that love the way I experience love where I want to take care of and protect a woman I keep close and intimate? For me love is cherish…protect, sacrifice for. for her it is granting permission to approach? The benefits I get from loving a woman are sex, procreation and care of children while I go out and gather resources.

See, I think love is a really crappy word because it can’t mean the same thing for a man and a woman…go through a thesaurus and you get closer to what love is with cherish, devotion, not preservation, maybe bond, commit, union with, gather together, walk together, something like that. But love isn’t the right word, it has 2 different meanings for our two different genders because we have two different functions in life. love puts women on a pedestal and makes men do stupid things chemical f~~~ery in a man’s head.

is love a form of preference? maybe it is men who can not love…can we prefer yeah we select one woman over another, where am I goinghere, its 130 why am I doing this, because this s~~~ bugs me that I can t figure it out. im smarter than this I think

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

I don’t think it was tuna, and I do feel he was misunderstood.

It is not like he wasn’t given a chance to clarify or explain.

True, but he had already been attacked, and not every kid/man that comes here is going to be able to come out swinging when they are just looking for validation. These guys are not all going to be lions, if anything we should be here to help them FIND their inner lion.

You know, I think you are a really solid poster, and I like your posts, but I don’t get all this “Attack!” stuff from you here, or in that thread. I think it was pretty civil.
I kept sticking to the points I was making, the issue I had with its thesis, and asking for his thoughts/explanation/ answer/ rebuttal, and it just wouldn’t do anything but play victim, and you fed into it didn’t help imo.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

It is not like he wasn’t given a chance to clarify or explain.

I saw the original post and only scanned some replies. That topic should have expected a somewhat strong reaction considering the company he’s in…. but claws weren’t really called for. Yet. I did understand the strong reaction though.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

I don’t think it was tuna, and I do feel he was misunderstood.

It is not like he wasn’t given a chance to clarify or explain.

True, but he had already been attacked, and not every kid/man that comes here is going to be able to come out swinging when they are just looking for validation. These guys are not all going to be lions, if anything we should be here to help them FIND their inner lion.

You know, I think you are a really solid poster, and I like your posts, but I don’t get all this “Attack!” stuff from you here, or in that thread. I think it was pretty civil.
I kept sticking to the points I was making, the issue I had with its thesis, and asking for his thoughts/explanation/ answer/ rebuttal, and it just wouldn’t do anything but play victim, and you fed into it didn’t help imo.

There were open calls of Tuna with several likes, the kid felt attacked. He was already retreating by the time you got in there.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

It is not like he wasn’t given a chance to clarify or explain.

I saw the original post and only scanned some replies. That topic should have expected a somewhat strong reaction considering the company he’s in…. but claws weren’t really called for. Yet. I did understand the strong reaction though.

I just didn’t see the claws. I certainly didn’t have my claws out.

I tried to stick to my point and get it to clarify or correct etc.

It seemed to be too wrapped up in ego, and was p~~~ed its thesis wasn’t received as some breakthrough moment for all of us.

[bladeParticipant]

Face book is a safe space he will be ok

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

I don’t think it was tuna, and I do feel he was misunderstood.

It is not like he wasn’t given a chance to clarify or explain.

True, but he had already been attacked, and not every kid/man that comes here is going to be able to come out swinging when they are just looking for validation. These guys are not all going to be lions, if anything we should be here to help them FIND their inner lion.

You know, I think you are a really solid poster, and I like your posts, but I don’t get all this “Attack!” stuff from you here, or in that thread. I think it was pretty civil.
I kept sticking to the points I was making, the issue I had with its thesis, and asking for his thoughts/explanation/ answer/ rebuttal, and it just wouldn’t do anything but play victim, and you fed into it didn’t help imo.

There were open calls of Tuna with several likes, the kid felt attacked. He was already retreating by the time you got in there.

Thanks for the answer.
I tried to explain to him why the tuna might have come into play, as it didn’t seem to understand how playing devil’s advocate for the women’s position on love and hypergamy might get that response. I didn’t advocate that he poster was tuna, though quite frankly… eh, never mind.

I tried to stick to the points. I was disappointed at its responses or lack therof on merits.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

I don’t know about tuna, but it sure went the victim route really fast. It seemed to think it was supposed to only receive feedback agreeing with its POV that it is up to men to earn enough to make women happy in a relationship, or some such BS.

Nodding.

Pedal, run, row wrote:

What was up with the ego of it talking about its own “epic intro” and how we were all going to miss its great contribution? Seriously, who the f~~~ are you?

Didn’t catch that part.

Pedal, run, row wrote:

And if this was an indication of its contribution, playing devils advocate for women and their hypergamy

From what I saw, I guessed “hypergamy” was an unfamiliar word to him. That would explain it.

Interestingly, he mentioned he made a brief stop at PUA on the way to MGTOW, and I also said in his intro that I once knew a hardcore PUA who I met in person one day …. and when I showed him the “Hypergamy” video – and the website – his mind was blown.

It was a whole new realm he hadn’t considered.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Keymaster wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

It is not like he wasn’t given a chance to clarify or explain.

I saw the original post and only scanned some replies. That topic should have expected a somewhat strong reaction considering the company he’s in…. but claws weren’t really called for. Yet. I did understand the strong reaction though.

I just didn’t see the claws. I certainly didn’t have my claws out.

I tried to stick to my point and get it to clarify or correct etc.

It seemed to be too wrapped up in ego, and was p~~~ed its thesis wasn’t received as some breakthrough moment for all of us.

He had answered and said he did not blame men. Look, either way what was likely a young kid who liked us is now gone, make of the situation whatever you like.

[Author]

Posts