Slut shaming is good for PUAs but bad for MGTOW.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

Hi guys. On this site, I usually mock feminism (Criticizing it intelligently is pretty much pointless at this point.) … but I still think that I need to criticize other anti-feminists a bit. Let’s talk about sluts.

In one of my earlier threads, I summed up my attitude towards sluts. “Slut pride” is silly but sluts aren’t totally bad. Not all sluts want to be respected after all.

Some people say “Sluts have diseases.” That doesn’t matter to me because I use condoms. We all probably do. Some people say “Sluts are poor marriage material.” That means nothing to me because I go my own way. This isn’t a tradcon site.

I’ve noticed that most of the rabid slut hate actually comes from the PUA community. Why? Let’s talk about the 80/20 rule.

The 80/20 rule is a sociological rule that is discussed on several incel sites and PUA sites. The 80/20 rule works like this: 80 percent of women are f~~~ing the top 20 percent of men. This has created a women shortage. Thus, many men have difficulty getting laid.

I’m not exactly sure if 80/20 is the correct ratio … but I understand and agree with the central point. Lots of alpha males have a harem of “plates”.

Different anti-feminists have proposed different solutions to this problem. The incels will usually say “We need to enforce monogamy, just like in the good old days! That way, every man will have a woman.” The PUAs say “Any man can become an alpha male if he works hard enough.”

Neither of these are good solutions. Monogamy is dying and doomed. Nothing can save it now. Furthermore, not every man can be an alpha male. Some men are too poor and/or ugly for that.

The Real Solution: Let women be sluts.

That brings me back to the PUAs. The PUAs engage in slut shaming because they want to keep their harem in line. In other words, they have deliberately created the 80/20 rule … and now they offer us solutions to the problems that they created. What kind of brothers are they?

Overall, feminists perceive slut shaming in an overly simplistic way. It isn’t just something that men created to inconvenience women. It is something that “alphas” created to inconvenience women … and all other men. Something isn’t automatically good for men just because women hate it. If you tell a woman “You may only have one man.” then she is naturally going to pick an alpha. Hypergamy is natural and we need to accept it because it is never going away.

What if the female sex drive was unleashed? What are women attracted to? I understand women quite a bit. Women are attracted to many different men … but they stick to the high-status men because they can only pick one. PUAs have ruined women. The rational part of the female brain wants money and status, but female lust is more chaotic than that. Women sometimes think about low-class men lustfully … but they need to stick to one guy. Damn PUAs.

Let’s be optimistic about the “liberation of the female sex drive”. It will make getting laid even easier. Enjoy the decline.

It’s fun to make jokes about sluts from the dark corners of the web … but I don’t plan to discourage loose women in the real world. I plan to f~~~ them.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

I have to say I don’t think “slut shaming” is even really a thing any more… at least not in big cities.

Back in the day, men used to shame sluts because they were afraid that other men would steal their women. Didn’t help. The girls f~~~ed whomever they wanted, they just kept quiet about it.

Women shamed sluts because they didn’t want fat and ugly girls getting the good men. Didn’t help. Fat and ugly girls still got laid because they were easier and didn’t make a lot of demands on guys who just wanted to get laid.

Everyone knew what was going on… the same things that are going on now… just everyone kept more quiet about it.

Not any more.

Women do whatever they want still… which is to f~~~ whomever they want, whenever they want… only now they’re more out and proud about it. Fat ugly women throw themselves at guys and dudes still fear that someone else has a bigger dick and nobody can say s~~~ about it.

Who are these shame filled sluts, anyway? I haven’t seen one in well over a decade.

[HitmanParticipant]

Sluts were always great to have around.
Some of my favorite women were sluts.
Fun and easy.
No strings.
How much better can it get?
I know a lot better but it is what it is.

[RoyDalParticipant]

The whole reason I got laid in my blue pill days was because of sluts. The nice girls wouldn’t have a thing to do with me. Only the big men on campus were good enough for them.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Uintatherium wrote:

Let’s talk about sluts.

Way to open a dialogue. I just refilled my glass.

Uintatherium wrote:

I’ve noticed that most of the rabid slut hate actually comes from the PUA community. Why?

Being turned down by a “slut” is an insult to a PUA. He thinks he’s all “alpha” and has her number and can get the bang with a good “opinion opener”. I’m simplifying but you get the point.

I am less “insulted” by a woman who f~~~s another guy. If she said “I don’t want to be with you” and preferred to be single, then I would check myself in the mirror… but screwing another guy has little effect on me. Especially if she screwed around on her guy to be with ME. You can expect it from her.

I know it seems backwards but think about it. If she sluts her way into YOUR bed, you can set your timer, because she’s gonna do it again. It’s not personal.

Uintatherium wrote:

Some men are too poor and/or ugly for that.

OK fair enough….. but a woman can just as easily be hot for a broke, unemployed musician on a stolen motorbike with enough tattoos and body piercings to hang a shower curtain. You’ve seen that too. Dirty fingernails and all.

Good looking / tall / smart men are also disadvantaged in a way too. She can see a “hunk” and disqualify him as a “player” who she thinks will cheat on her. It’s all a random coin toss.

Uintatherium wrote:

The Real Solution: Let women be sluts.

That’s not unreasonable and I have seen it written like this: “being a slut is actually a decent option for women these days. It keeps her in the game. Other options are no longer realistic for them.”.

I don’t have a problem with “easy” women. I actually PREFER them to the difficult ones. As long as she doesn’t behave like a slut and pretend she’s not. Thats’ the worst kind.

Uintatherium wrote:

That brings me back to the PUAs. The PUAs engage in slut shaming because they want to keep their harem in line. In other words, they have deliberately created the 80/20 rule … and now they offer us solutions to the problems that they created. What kind of brothers are they?

Strongly disagree there.
PUAs don’t “create” jack s~~~, and they don’t deplete the supply either.

Women do.
That’s why PUAs exist.

When you’re going through a dry spell, it’s WOMEN who should be looking out for you and setting you up with her girlfriends. This actually happens in many cultures. It’s called “taking care of their men”. A totally foreign concept in western nations.

Americanized women don’t want you to have options. It’s her, or you get nothing and she gloats and enjoys it. She’s not doing you any favors and introducing you to her friends. When it doesn’t work out with one girl, she doesn’t say “well you’re not my type, but I know 3 girls who would LOVE to go out with you! Let me put in a good world for you.”.

Forget it. Not happening. They compete with each other like hyenas for a carcass and they are not sharing. If she’s not into you, you’re now pond scum.

Uintatherium wrote:

What are women attracted to? I understand women quite a bit. Women are attracted to many different men … but they stick to the high-status men

Don’t pay any attention to that. All of this depends on her age, if she had any kids, the Wall™, if she can even GET (or keep) a “high status” man. Status only needs to be PERCEIVED status anyway. You know, “the $30,000 millionaire” with a $1200 car lease payment, fake Rolex Daytona and not much else?? He can get some tail too. Just by ACTING like he has status.

“Hello I’m a doctor”. Done.

What she’s attracted to changes over time and rapidly. It’s a constant struggle between the guy she WANTS — and the guy she can GET. Think Pamela Anderson.

Women may control what YOU get.
But they have no say in what THEY get.

Uintatherium wrote:

I don’t plan to discourage loose women

I don’t either. Skanky ones I can do with out, but I always like the overtly horny ones who responded positively to male attention and were care free about it.

There’s a big difference between “trying to get into her pants”….
And the kind of girl who is happy to take them of FOR you.

Ignore the rest.

“Slut” is only what she is called in the eyes of other WOMEN who shame her for lowering every whore’s price…. and by PUAs who learn that a slut will f~~~ anyone, but a bitch will f~~~ anybody but YOU.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Hitman wrote:

Sluts were always great to have around.
Some of my favorite women were sluts.
Fun and easy.
No strings.
How much better can it get?

Agree with that 100%

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

I agree with the above, there aren’t sluts anymore, just women and AWALT.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Y_Participant 4591]

Every female able to do it is a slut for some reason in her sordid life.
Those that can’t throw s~~~ – ’cause they can’t.
Just a matter of knowing what turns the slut on.

[MutineerParticipant 1467]

Is f~~~ing sluts even worth the effort? I think the risks outweigh the benefits. If she’s a slut then she’s not much of a conquest and that’s part of the fun. Alternatively, her sluttiness might be a symptom of BPD an you could have a giant s~~~ storm coming your way.

"The secret to happiness is freedom... And the secret to freedom is courage." - Thucydides

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

Overall, some people who discuss human sexuality fail to realize that there is a conflict between lust and reason. This constantly comes up whenever people online say “Women only want to f~~~ alphas.”

I’ve browsed DeviantArt with the mature content filter off … so you don’t have to. Lesson Learned: Women will often lust after men who are shy or ugly. They can’t do this IRL (for reasons I already discussed) but they will indulge in this weird, crazy lust when they are protected by the anonymity of the internet.

I laugh out loud whenever racists say “The Jews have turned our women into whores!” Nope! They were always whores deep down. Stop pretending that women are “pure hearted” like the virgin Mary. Stop pretending that women are “naturally chaste”. They is a myth. It never happened.

Male sexuality is somewhat similar in that there is a clear conflict between lust and reason. That’s why the phrase “Don’t stick your dick in crazy.” exists. Some mentally ill women are sexy in a kinky sort of way … but committing to one is a very bad idea.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Uintatherium wrote:

The Real Solution: Let women be sluts.

I find it hard to shame anyone who is engaging in the same behavior as myself. I love a good slut.

I like honesty that she is in it for the sex and makes it clear she is not going to be faithful and doesn’t want faithfulness back. I don’t feel trapped or pressured because she wants to move on and values freedom as much as I do.

I don’t like the woman who pretends to be a slut, then when she gets at some cuck’s assets turns off the sex.

I think PUA’s have weak egos that need constant validation and when they don’t get it they turn sour.

MGTOW is being a lone alpha. Sluts love that.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Author]

Posts