Should females be infantry?

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

A real battle, could females have done this?

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

To answer your question, our infantry should be all female. After all, we’ve oppressed them enough. Let them femisplane to us how a war should be fought.

On a serious note, we might be much more thoughtful about going to war if we sent our wives and daughters into battle. Since they aren’t disposable like men.

Order the good wine

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

You do make a great point, TaxGuy.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 42]

Should females be infantry?

Only if they’re in burlap bags and piled up around your foxhole or machine gun nest. Other than that they’re a liability and utterly useless on the battlefield!

[Anonymous 3]

TaxGuy wrote:

we might be much more thoughtful about going to war if we sent our wives and daughters into battle. Since they aren’t disposable like men.

“We” might. But unfortunately “we” have little to say about when going to war.

And I bet that there would be a sudden shortage of feminists and empowered women in case of a war and women having any chance of taking any kind of risk…

[TuneoutParticipant]

TaxGuy wrote:

On a serious note, we might be much more thoughtful about going to war if we sent our wives and daughters into battle. Since they aren’t disposable like men.

I think the winds of change are a blown’ on that outdated attitude – and strangely we have the femnazi’s and their gov’t lap dogs to thank for that.

I bet there are many husbands who wouldn’t mind seeing their wives on the front line,lol.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

They should be like medics, only instead of medical assistance, its blowjob assistance. I’ve just been f~~~ing hit with shrapnel in my ass bitch, i need a blowjob to ease the pain, now get sucking slut!!! Shoving their head down as its bobbing and blow your load out faster than a f~~~ing 105mm howitzer.

[NeroParticipant 1466]

TaxGuy wrote:

To answer your question, our infantry should be all female. After all, we’ve oppressed them enough. Let them femisplane to us how a war should be fought.

On a serious note, we might be much more thoughtful about going to war if we sent our wives and daughters into battle. Since they aren’t disposable like men.

I agree with TaxGuy. I mean, we already know women have been the actual victims of previous wars. All those mothers, wives, sisters, etc. Don’t let them be the victims any longer!

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

TaxGuy wrote:

Since they aren’t disposable like men.

Speaking as a man who, by choice, has no children of my own to support and yet still has to pay massive extra taxes to feed, house, clothe and support those women…

…they are very f~~~ing disposable.

[Bestieboy666Participant 2358]

They should send them to the front line is ISIS controlled areas. Might be better to arm them with condoms instead of bullets.

Women are so bad, if they changed the law so I kept the house, I still wouldn't marry one. I'd rather be homeless.

[Anonymous 14]

I am with Taxguy on this one-

Yes, they should. In fact, let’s have the whole Military be women, in a few thousand years they may be able to get close to what men have sacrificed over the centuries, that way we can make some actual progress towards equality.

[AttonParticipant]

Personally I couldn’t care how incapable they are. My dream job would be drafting these so called strong and independent women at gun point with state sanction. They can go out and fight and die in their own wars for once honestly.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Rafe GBParticipant 474]

Women are victims. This “empowers” them to destroy enemy patriarchal men in battlefield conditions and in a unique way spread feminism to less enlightened countries.
I know I might be off base, but I’m thinking win/win here.

/sarcasm

MGTOW: The silent heralds of cataclysmic societal change. AGAIN!

[Anonymous 0]

Whenever I get on my soapbox about quotas in the workplace for women, my argument always leads to suggesting a genuine 50/50 split I list all the jobs with the finale being 50% frontline serving troops. That’s the point (if talking to a woman) I am met with abuse and dismissal of logic.

Also I have heard, on more than one occasion, claims that the reason woman can’t serve on the frontline is because they would distract the men and have them distressed and hesitant over a woman dead body.
That’s right folks, according to women, it turns out it’s yet again men stopping women from fighting.

But answer the original question.
No, justice and fairness aside, I feel safer with men between me and those that want to kill me. Thanks as always to those who are.

[Y_Participant 4591]

I believe that females should have their own all-female units and should be sent out to get killed just like men.

And the 50-50 quota should be mandatory. If serving females die because they are unable to do their job then they should be replaced by more females. This way the 50-50 rule is maintained and we get rid of the stupid ones who think they are just as good as us – forever and quickly.

This will teach them about real equality. Let them earn it.
With their blood. I bet you none of them will do it. Bitches.

[Author]

Posts