Should America ban AUTOMATIC rifles?

Topic by Blue Skies

Blue Skies

Home Forums Political Corner Should America ban AUTOMATIC rifles?

This topic contains 69 replies, has 24 voices, and was last updated by Surfdude12  surfdude12 2 years, 3 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 70 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #617315
    +5
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    Personally, i think the US should ban automatic ones. All other guns should be legal, as part of the constitution.

    People are not allowed to carry around bombs that can kill 50+ ppl at once. So why should people be allowed to carry automatic guns that do the same?

    If citizens wanted to fight the government (due to corruption or some form of evil), the US military has much superior weapons than automatic rifles (such as large fleets of fighter jets). There’s no chance of winning against your own military.

    Let’s discuss, and please explain your reasoning.

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

    #617317
    +8
    Ghost
    ghost
    Participant

    We should legalize fully automatic weapons, not that it would matter to me. I’ve already got a couple.

    #617319
    +17

    Anonymous
    6

    Automatic weapons were already banned and have been since 1986.

    The only way to get them is with a class 3 weapons license. Which some firearms dealers can’t even get.

    This shooter more than likely modified another weapon to fit what he needed.

    #617322
    +2
    Freedom
    freedom
    Participant
    5129

    No, what happened today, happened because he was able to buy these weapons, otherwise, that psycho would have killed 2-3 people tops.

    I’m ok with people buying pistols, but having citizens buy automatic weapons with which they can group together into a militia is totally f~~~ed up. Think of what’s going on in Columbia, yeah sure all those Farc and others got their weapons legally, but if things ever go the wrong way in the states, people may start building their own small armies, same as in Columbia.

    #617326
    +1
    Juehue
    Juehue
    Participant
    1316

    Current gun control laws aim to reduce the clip size and prevent other add-ons right?

    #617327
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    I’m ok with people buying pistols, but having citizens buy automatic weapons with which they build a militia is totally f~~~ed up.

    people may start building their own small armies, same as in Columbia.

    agree, and that’s why i think they should be completely banned, except for military and police.

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

    #617329
    +5

    Anonymous
    7

    Automatic weapons were already banned and have been since 1986.

    The only way to get them is with a class 3 weapons license. Which some firearms dealers can’t even get.

    This shooter more than likely modified another weapon to fit what he needed.

    Beat me to it.

    I would add that modifying a semi-auto into full auto is illegal (not sure if it is if you have the class 3).

    More laws aren’t going to do a darn thing.

    Lets say the US goes full leftard utopia and all firearms are banned…..
    Cocain is illegal, being illegal doesn’t stop it from pouring over the border.

    #617330
    +10
    TaxGuy
    TaxGuy
    Participant

    No, I think what happened today, happened because he was able to buy these weapons.

    I’m ok with people buying pistols, but having citizens buy automatic weapons with which they build a militia is totally f~~~ed up. Think of what’s going on in Columbia, yeah sure all those Farc and others got their weapons legally, but if things ever go the wrong way in the states, people may start building their own small armies, same as in Columbia.

    But being able to build a militia is EXACTLY the reason for the Second Amendment. The First Amendment guarantees our right to freedom of speech, particularly the ability to speak against our own government. The Second Amendment guards the First Amendment from a leader trying to limit your First Amendment rights. The founding fathers were afraid there would come a day when a ruler would try to change or bend the rules. So they made sure we had a way to fight.

    Order the good wine

    #617334
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    But being able to build a militia is EXACTLY the reason for the Second Amendment. The First Amendment guarantees our right to freedom of speech, particularly the ability to speak against our own government. The Second Amendment guards the First Amendment from a leader trying to limit your First Amendment rights. The founding fathers were afraid there would come a day when a ruler would try to change or bend the rules. So they made sure we had a way to fight.

    how are automatic weapons going to defeat tanks and fighter jets?

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

    #617335
    +1
    Freedom
    freedom
    Participant
    5129

    No, I think what happened today, happened because he was able to buy these weapons.

    I’m ok with people buying pistols, but having citizens buy automatic weapons with which they build a militia is totally f~~~ed up. Think of what’s going on in Columbia, yeah sure all those Farc and others got their weapons legally, but if things ever go the wrong way in the states, people may start building their own small armies, same as in Columbia.

    But being able to build a militia is EXACTLY the reason for the Second Amendment. The First Amendment guarantees our right to freedom of speech, particularly the ability to speak against our own government. The Second Amendment guards the First Amendment from a leader trying to limit your First Amendment rights. The founding fathers were afraid there would come a day when a ruler would try to change or bend the rules. So they made sure we had a way to fight.

    do you think regular citizens with M16 and sniper rifles can beat the US army? nope, but they can kill s~~~ load of people when they are emotionally unstable

    #617336
    +3

    Anonymous
    1

    Nobody is trying to take your guns

    They only want to make you register them, restrict transfers, ban certain guns, limit magazine capacity, prohibit carrying them, ban or limit ammo, require they be inoperable when not in use, require insurance to own, require you to buy high priced/low reliability “smart guns”, make other arbitrary laws, and, if we catch you violating any of these made-up rules, throw you in prison… at which point we will take your guns.

    #617340
    +2
    Ghost
    ghost
    Participant

    agree, and that’s why i think they should be completely banned, except for military and police.

    We are already headed in this direction longer-term. The empowerment of the American woman will only continue as a result. Men need to wise up and learn how to protect themselves using all available tools. It could be knowledge, weapons or a combination. It all depends on your specific locality and lifestyle.

    The effeminate pussy beggar men will always outnumber men like myself. I am okay with going against the grain. I have done that my entire life.

    #617343
    +13
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    Apparently BMW doesn’t know how difficult it is to legally own a fully auto-weapon. It is nearly impossible. I might also point out that full auto is ONLY effective in crowded areas–other wise its just a waste of ammo.

    Besides even if they were illegal how is that going to stop someone intent upon committing a crime in the first place? Only liberals think that a bank robber, mugger, murderer is going to think to themselves: “Yeah I’m going to commit this crime BUT OH MY I’d be breaking the law if I use a gun so I guess I’ll behave myself.” Besides any gunsmith worth his salt can convert a semi-auto to full auto without much effort.

    There is a better solution to the Vegas attack. I would bet $100 that the catalyst for this event is a bitch–somewhere somehow a c~~~ is involved. This guy’s attack was rage-fueled, not personal. I wonder if he knew about MGTOW or had access to MGTOW. And if WE as a group could have addressed his red-pill rage. Granted I’m speculating about motive—but then what/why is a guy going to lose his s~~~ like this? Where have we seen this kind of rage before? (See the Forum blue pill hell)

    #617344
    +4
    Kolaxis
    Kolaxis
    Participant
    668

    The founding fathers were afraid there would come a day when a ruler would try to change or bend the rules. So they made sure we had a way to fight.

    And that’s exactly why they want to take our guns away. So much easier to rule us when we can offer no opposition.

    All of this gun control propaganda is total BS. People actually believe that if a certain type of gun is illegal that it’ll magically go away? It’s good to know that the war on drugs ended drug use for all time. Oh, wait, it didn’t. It’s good to know that no one under 21 drinks alcohol in the US. Oh, wait, they do. It’s good to know that no crimes are committed anywhere in the country since they’re illegal. Oh, wait…

    Jackie: How do you write women so well?
    Melvin Udall: I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.

    #617348
    +5
    IRuleMe
    IRuleMe
    Participant

    No, I think what happened today, happened because he was able to buy these weapons.

    I’m ok with people buying pistols, but having citizens buy automatic weapons with which they build a militia is totally f~~~ed up. Think of what’s going on in Columbia, yeah sure all those Farc and others got their weapons legally, but if things ever go the wrong way in the states, people may start building their own small armies, same as in Columbia.

    But being able to build a militia is EXACTLY the reason for the Second Amendment. The First Amendment guarantees our right to freedom of speech, particularly the ability to speak against our own government. The Second Amendment guards the First Amendment from a leader trying to limit your First Amendment rights. The founding fathers were afraid there would come a day when a ruler would try to change or bend the rules. So they made sure we had a way to fight.

    do you think regular citizens with M16 and sniper rifles can beat the US army? nope, but they can kill s~~~ load of people when they are emotionally unstable

    We beat the largest army in the world for our independence did we not? Nobody thought a bunch of colonies could defeat the mighty empire.

    #617349
    +4

    Anonymous
    2

    Imagine the effects of a sawed off 12 gauge shotgun with a large buckshot? In close would be a slaughter. I’m not promoting this but 6 3 inch cshells can f~~~ a lot up in a hurry. Any time this happens the anti American idiots want weapons banned. It’s never good for our freedoms.

    I’m all for open carry everywhere. Does the casino it happened in have a no concealed carry rule? People would think twice walking in somewhere where there’s a couple hundred others with weapons. Not all but most. Sad for the lose of life and wounded. Thoughts and Prayers to them.

    #617350
    +1
    Kolaxis
    Kolaxis
    Participant
    668

    Nobody is trying to take your guns

    It’s a step-by-step process. Numerous examples of how this works have already played out in Europe.

    Jackie: How do you write women so well?
    Melvin Udall: I think of a man and I take away reason and accountability.

    #617351
    +4
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    how are automatic weapons going to defeat tanks and fighter jets?

    Ask the Afgans they’ve been doing it for 16 years.

    #617352
    +3

    Anonymous
    1

    Because trusting any government with the monopoly on force works out well for the serfs.

    #617353
    +1
    Blue Skies
    Blue Skies
    Participant
    15665

    Apparently BMW doesn’t know how difficult it is to legally own a fully auto-weapon

    My apologies, i don’t live in the US.

    MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 70 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.