Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Sexless Japan: The future of America and the future state of civilization
This topic contains 38 replies, has 25 voices, and was last updated by
Twist 2 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Hmm, right there the famous mousytopia experiment springs to my mind. Ahh well …
I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC
The future of the civilization is not my concern. My motto is: be a decent human being and treat people with respect, as long as they deserve it.
But that doesn’t me I put myself at a disadvantage and wife up just so my dna can propogate. Who gives a f~~~?
If millions of men feels the same way, and choose not to marry and have kids, thus leading to the downfall of humans…well then, so be it. You can argue that it’s the natural outcome of what turns out to be a defective genetic makeup of our species.
If there’s a god, or some other higher power, he knows the plight of man as we face a hostile feminist environment now, and hopefully can forgive our decision to want to live a peaceful life, even if that means not having offsprings.
God bless peace and freedom.
Dildo sales must be setting records.
Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.
Japan:
1. Gone MGTOW
2. Bans all immigrationWhat’s the problem?
I blame cat girls for the reduced population growth, but honestly that which goes up must come down.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

Anonymous2lol I have a “fix”. But I don’t think the politicians, legislators, judges, and law enforcement that enforced the misandrist system are going to willingly walk into the guillotine for the betterment of mankind.
So it’s up to the cupcakes to get off their asses and drag these white knights to them. If this is really a problem, and it really concerns women, that’s what they’re going to have to do.
I guess they did start by voting Trump in, but that’s a small start, and they’re not silencing all the liberal women that are marching and still complaining. Get your house in order women. You want to pretend NAWALT and feminists don’t represent all women, but talk is cheap. Start the killing while I grab my popcorn.
Never going to happen. Women will never derail their own gravy train, and which politician you vote for makes little difference. Keep in mind that it was a conservative named Ronald Regan who was responsible for instituting no fault divorce in the States. Tradcons and feminists are just two sides of the same coin of gynocentrism. Arguing about which one is better for men to support is like arguing about whether it is better to be eaten by a shark or a crocodile. When Trump starts opening enough male homeless shelters to properly care for the 90% male homeless population, creates laws that give fathers equal rights to their children, does away with alimony, gives single fathers an automatic eligibility for government benefits the way single mothers are allowed, and offers all the same free health benefits to men that women are allowed, then I’ll give him some credit. Until then, he’s just another tradcon upholding the gynocentric system.

Anonymous3lol I have a “fix”. But I don’t think the politicians, legislators, judges, and law enforcement that enforced the misandrist system are going to willingly walk into the guillotine for the betterment of mankind.
So it’s up to the cupcakes to get off their asses and drag these white knights to them. If this is really a problem, and it really concerns women, that’s what they’re going to have to do.
I guess they did start by voting Trump in, but that’s a small start, and they’re not silencing all the liberal women that are marching and still complaining. Get your house in order women. You want to pretend NAWALT and feminists don’t represent all women, but talk is cheap. Start the killing while I grab my popcorn.
Never going to happen. Women will never derail their own gravy train, and which politician you vote for makes little difference. Keep in mind that it was a conservative named Ronald Regan who was responsible for instituting no fault divorce in the States. Tradcons and feminists are just two sides of the same coin of gynocentrism. Arguing about which one is better for men to support is like arguing about whether it is better to be eaten by a shark or a crocodile. When Trump starts opening enough male homeless shelters to properly care for the 90% male homeless population, creates laws that give fathers equal rights to their children, does away with alimony, gives single fathers an automatic eligibility for government benefits the way single mothers are allowed, and offers all the same free health benefits to men that women are allowed, then I’ll give him some credit. Until then, he’s just another tradcon upholding the gynocentric system.
I don’t disagree with any of that. In fact, I have often posted about Reagan on these forums.

Anonymous2Japan:
1. Gone MGTOW
2. Bans all immigrationWhat’s the problem?
Ever notice that Japan gets ABSOLUTELY ZERO CRITICISM of xenophobia from the social justice warriors? Hmmm…isn’t it strange how when people in Canada protest about Muslim students being allowed to have prayer rooms in public schools, while Christians are not allowed to do the same, they are immediately labeled as xenophobic, but when Japan has very strict immigration policies because they don’t want the Japanese culture to become extinct, there’s not a peep out of the SJWs?
Oh, I forgot. Japan isn’t a nation with a native WHITE population, so they can be as xenophobic as they want and get a free pass! SJW logic at its finest!
@murph: yes!!!! Dude I’ll move there if our borders aren’t protected from these refugees from terrorist nations!! But then there’s NK threat so who knows lol
The more I know about women the less interest they hold for me.
It’s interesting, I don’t hate women at all.
I just don’t see them.
They are invisible.
This, in turn, and according to my plan, makes me invisible to the world. A ghost.
That is part of the essence of going your own way.
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

Anonymous3So When do men and Women Stop communicating?When Women become too problematic for men and men decide to invest their time and energy into something that purely satisfies them on an Individual level
The answer is simple. When their women decided they wanted it all and became unattainable according to hypergamy more men decided to opt out. It happened at the same time as the tech boom, but is it causation or correlation?
Not anymore. I now take it naturally as another phase if human history
This planet would be full of life, even if humankind disappears. The worst we can do will be cleaned up in a few million years.
Life prevails.
first, thanks for the loong goodby & good luck. generally I take responsibility for my own life. I love those bumper stickers that say ” save the planet ” we as a species will b long gone & the world will keep spinning around
Unless there are some major legislative changes, the population in many countries will decline.
Either remove the current punitive divorce laws and replace them with zero alimony, zero child support remove the no fault divorce option
Removing the no fault divorce would be removing an option, removing a personal freedom.
What need to be done is “no fault divorce = no alimonies”.and force these idiot women from declaring “I’m not haaaaapy I want a divorce” and force them to stay in serviceable marriages.
No.
Forcing people to stay in marriage is tradcon bulls~~~, it also led men to be workhorses breaking their back by working 10 hours per day.
The solution is MORE freedom: men thrive when they have freedom, what we have now is freedom and special privileges for women, and no freedom for men.
The solution is:
No alimonies.
The right for men to surrender rights and duties of fatherhood (“financial abortion”).SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Never going to happen. Women will never derail their own gravy train, and which politician you vote for makes little difference. Keep in mind that it was a conservative named Ronald Regan who was responsible for instituting no fault divorce in the States. Tradcons and feminists are just two sides of the same coin of gynocentrism. Arguing about which one is better for men to support is like arguing about whether it is better to be eaten by a shark or a crocodile. When Trump starts opening enough male homeless shelters to properly care for the 90% male homeless population, creates laws that give fathers equal rights to their children, does away with alimony, gives single fathers an automatic eligibility for government benefits the way single mothers are allowed, and offers all the same free health benefits to men that women are allowed, then I’ll give him some credit. Until then, he’s just another tradcon upholding the gynocentric system.
This.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Unless there are some major legislative changes, the population in many countries will decline.
In Western countries, the population of Westerners will drop but the immigrants will take up the slack. We are already seeing this happening now in Canada. Brampton is a major city in Ontario where the population of non-Westerners now exceeds the population of Westerners.
Non-Westerners are anticipating the decline of Western birth rates in Western countries. This is wait they’re waiting for. They don’t give a f~~~ about the family laws in Western society so they will continue to punch out kids at a high rate. Things are going to get nasty real soon…
Unless there are some major legislative changes, the population in many countries will decline.
Either remove the current punitive divorce laws and replace them with zero alimony, zero child support remove the no fault divorce option and force these idiot women from declaring “I’m not haaaaapy I want a divorce” and force them to stay in serviceable marriages.
I honestly believe that changing laws and legislation around divorce would have a limited impact. Yes, things wouldn’t be such a bad deal for men if they weren’t stuck paying child support/ alimony and being on the losing end of marriage breakdowns, etc. but I for one still wouldn’t want a woman permanently in my life either way.
I just don’t want to put up with woman’s s~~~. The nagging/bitching/complaining/drama that is associated with being in relations~~~s doesn’t appeal to me in the slightest and that s~~~ won’t change regardless of any amendments to the laws.
I just want my freedom and to have peace and f~~~ing quiet
The single biggest threat to your happiness is women and the only way to win is to not play the game
I missed the part where that’s my problem – Peter Parker. They can save themselves but it would take great effort. But as long as feminism and the way men are treated through the judicial system I doubt any man in his right mind will care.
No one knows the true worth of a man.
Unless there are some major legislative changes, the population in many countries will decline.
No, nothing ever changes.
"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain
I don’t know about the geographical dynamics where my MGTOW bro’s live, but i can tell you at my workplace i’m the only guy without a girlfriend or wife out of about 45 guys. So i could be wrong but i don’t think the U.S will resemble Japan anytime in the near future.
I honestly have no problem with population declining, if anything it’s part of natural selection doing what it does best. Maybe overall the U.S is headed in the same direction as Japan, but i don’t see it in my local area.
Keep in mind that it was a conservative named Ronald Regan who was responsible for instituting no fault divorce in the States.
Reagan later called it the biggest mistake of his political career
Read more at http://www.phillymag.com/news/2013/04/18/real-threat-marriage-no-fault-divorce/#rgIvVBMJmXgEpCLL.99Removing “fault” for voiding a contract is a contradiction. Contracts by their definition have consequences for violation of terms. It is easier to get out of a marriage today (I’m not happy) than to get out of your cell phone contract. If there are no faults and consequences there is no contract. i.e. – end of marriage. I’m OK with that. I was incorporated into no-fault when the law changed, even though it was not the law 20 years earlier when I signed a contract.
Women’s hysteria used to get them deposited into the loony bin. Now it drives their abuse of no-fault and mobilizes their army of supporters to use it for ultimate destruction.
What fixes this? I don’t give a f~~~. Not playing the game.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
