Sex Robots. Do they emancipate us or tie us to pussy?

[DocParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

By having sex with simulated pussy you feel that you are “cheating” on your monkish lifestyle.

100% correct. By having an artifice pussy it’s still a pussy. So it feels like I’m betraying myself.
My principles and my unsaid statement that says F~~~ You to women.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[DocParticipant]

Monk wrote:

Although artificial c~~~s negate the principal power of women, they still represent enslavement to the sex drive.

Spot on. My point in some respect. And that is one thing women have over us. We may be able to create machines that remove women but THEY know what it is we are chasing.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[ghostParticipant]

Sex robots are for effeminate, pussy beggar men who can’t get the real thing.

I don’t care for the real thing anymore so why would I ever want a sex robot?

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Monk wrote:

Although artificial c~~~s negate the principal power of women, they still represent enslavement to the sex drive.

Exactly.
But your sex drive cannot divorce rape you, not to force you to wait in a mall for 5 hours while she’s spending all your money: I haven’t been divorce raped but my ex wife had compulsory shopping syndrome and I actually enjoyed more being at work than the sundays with her at the mall, once she spent 2,200 euro in a day without buying special things, just business as usual but more upscaled due she was in the mood. We had quite great sex such night, due she was “really happy”, but it costed me 2,200 euro plus more about 5 hours at the mall. 2,200 euro is actually about 2,800 $ adjusted to the exchange rate and inflation (it was some years ago), and then 5 hours of my life.
Another day she forced me to go at the supermarket 4 times in a day, because she kept forgotting some ingredients. Needless to say that even if the meal was delicious, it also costed actually more than having it in a first class restaurant.

So I fail to see “being slave of my sex drive” as a major problem, since it’s basically employing few hours of my free time in a happy way while my bank balance keeps growing.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[DocParticipant]

I’m a slave to my sex drive some days. Others I’m ok.
When I’m enslaved I deal with it the way any man can.

And let’s face it once the deed is done either by hand or pussy the relief is there. Sorry to be straight talkin.

And on reflection. The more I think about it the more accepting I am that this is how I choose to live because being with a woman is simply s~~~.

And everything Eric says I completely agree with.
Every single relationship has ended in being held hostage and slammed with guilt for having a sex drive.

Yes – I will admit this too – I ain’t afraid of using a whore house when need. Haven’t in years mind but if the mood took me I would do it again. But I don’t because a Manuel rectification of a sex drive sorts it before I spend money that goes on my kids.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[ghostParticipant]

Doc wrote:

I’m a slave to my sex drive some days. Others I’m ok.
When I’m enslaved I deal with it the way any man can.

And let’s face it once the deed is done either by hand or pussy the relief is there. Sorry to be straight talkin.

I am a slave to my biology every single day. There are some days I release 4-5 times in a single day. There is no shame in that.

I could still kill someone after a day like that. The one thing I will never do is let a woman try and play me for a fool.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

What’s funny is that I’m actually promoting sex robots while I have no intentions to buy it.
It’s because I foresee the full implications of the power shift.

Let’s be very clear: such thing have the potential to push women back 100 years in the past. I’m meaning 1917. It’s not an exaggeration, it’s the expected average. The extreme consequence can be women totally disappearing.

Feminism in the west was successful because it pandered to men’s sexual desires with the sexual revolution.
That’s also why now feminism is receiving a backlash: they aren’t delivering more sex, quite the opposite, they’re restricting it.

Other shocking news: “Chad” is probably going to buy it well before the average joe.
“Chad” have both a stronger sexual desire and he’s less prone to be ashamed than the average joe: when women were obliged to arrive virgins to the wedding night, then “Chad” was either f~~~ing post-wall widows, prostitutes in the brothels (if he was from a rich family) or f~~~ing sheeps (if he was poor). Can you imagine having sex with an old widow or a sheep? That’s why they’re going to buy the sex robots well before the avergae joe.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[ghostParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

What’s funny is that I’m actually promoting sex robots while I have no intentions to buy it.
It’s because I foresee the full implications of the power shift.

I understand why you’re doing it. You want the pussy beggar men to use them instead of giving women so much power. I think that’s fair.

[DocParticipant]

Some good points Eric.
I truly hope you are right. The abuse of their newly found power is frankly breathtaking as it is disgusting.

I am not in any way against sex bots. Or have issues with anyone who uses them I was just wondering if it changed anything in principle. But I appreciate the implications that may come with mass proliferation of sex bots and even robots in general. I don’t think the new Blade Runner can be far from reality.

The pace of technological pace is incredible and we only have access to what the military have tossed us. F~~~ knows what the real cutting edge looks like.
Classified material may show we are closer to Blade runner than we realise.

I agree Gambit.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[guiParticipant 825]

It’s not pussy worshiping. It’s just an elaborate form of masturbation and thus we should be free to use it (I know you didn’t say they should be banned, I just said that because women unjustly want them prohibited).

Well, I believe masturbation is healthy because lots of reasons and will definetely try out those robots in the future.

Pity and contempt are siblings. You only feel pity for those you consider weak.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Depends. Once they have robot versions that can divorce your ass and take half, they’ll tie us to pussy. Until then how is it any different than choking the chicken looking at your phone? You’re getting off with the assistance of technology.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

ghost wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

What’s funny is that I’m actually promoting sex robots while I have no intentions to buy it.
It’s because I foresee the full implications of the power shift.

I understand why you’re doing it. You want the pussy beggar men to use them instead of giving women so much power. I think that’s fair.

I think that’s awesome.
This is going to change the world.
I don’t think it’ll be just only for pussy beggars: just think about the implications of having multiple robots – that’s basically giving to every man born after 2010 (they’ll be 25 in 2035, and 40 in 2050) the chance to buy a fake but still quite realistic and well working version of the Ottoman Imperial Harem. It isn’t much different from buying a flight simulator program and a 1,000 $ full c~~~pit to be used attached to the computer, and then piloting a Hellcat fighter engaging a bunch of Japanese Zeros: would you call those players “losers who can’t get a real amateur pilot patent”? Still, that is the difference between having a relationship with a real woman who is a 7, and having an “harem” composed by a bunch of 10+ very exotic sex robots.

I’m thinking about something like that, just to make it very clear

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[ghostParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

I think that’s awesome.
This is going to change the world.
I don’t think it’ll be just only for pussy beggars: just think about the implications of having multiple robots – that’s basically giving to every man born after 2010 (they’ll be 25 in 2035, and 40 in 2050) the chance to buy a fake but still quite realistic and well working version of the Ottoman Imperial Harem. It isn’t much different from buying a flight simulator program and a 1,000 $ full c~~~pit to be used attached to the computer, and then piloting a Hellcat fighter engaging a bunch of Japanese Zeros: would you call those players “losers who can’t get a real amateur pilot patent”? Still, that is the difference between having a relationship with a real woman who is a 7, and having an “harem” composed by a bunch of 10+ very exotic sex robots.

Good point. I agree.

[DocParticipant]

My son is gonna have a happy adulthood.
He is 5.
So by 2050 he will be 38.
My daughter will be 37.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Doc wrote:

My son is gonna have a happy adulthood.
He is 5.
So by 2050 he will be 38.
My daughter will be 37.

Your daughter is gonna having a good career.
Your son is gonna having a lot of fun.
Same for my daughter and my son (actually 12 ad 13).

It seems fair enough to me: after all, women are particularly excited by resources/money, and men by bodies/sex, right?

To paraphrase Marx:

From each according to her ability, to each according to his needs

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 12]

Oldschool wrote:

Sex robots will never take the place of women. We are hunters and we enjoy the hunt. There is nothing that can replace the experience of getting a female in bed and peeling down those panties for the first time knowing you are going to f~~~ her. Pregnancy, STD’s, false rape, it don’t matter. The power of the pussy is in our DNA and is not going to change. FLAME AWAY, brothers….

The effort and the risks always outweighed the reward for me. I used whores from the start. Robots or Virtual Reality porn would be even better.

[NomadicExpatParticipant 1785]

ghost wrote:

Sex robots are for effeminate, pussy beggar men who can’t get the real thing.

I don’t care for the real thing anymore so why would I ever want a sex robot?

100% disagree with you on this, Bro.

ghost wrote:

Sex robots are for effeminate, pussy beggar men who can’t get the real thing.

This is exactly the feminist first line of defense regarding sex robots. Shaming tactics and sweeping accusations. This line of thinking falls in lock step with “your not a real Man if…” mentality.

How many times have you heard this said about MGTOWS? That we are all a bunch of incels because “we cant get the real thing”? How true is that in reality?

Women have been the gatekeepers of sexual gratification since the dawn of time. It has truly been the only real advantage they have in interpersonal relations.

Gentlemen, we are about to witness an Event Horizon that will rival the dawn of the internet, once sex robots go mainstream. Womens monopoly on sexual gratification will be finally severed completely, once and for all. Printed pieces of paper cannot fully simulate sexual gratification, nor pixels on a screen. But a perfect, lifelike rendering, with squishy parts in all the right places?

Even if you HATE sex robots, I guarantee you en masse women will HAVE to walk back their hypergamous, radically femenized attention whoring behavior to secure the type of Men they once could. This will be a HUGE win for ALL Men, even if you never partake.

ghost wrote:

I don’t care for the real thing anymore so why would I ever want a sex robot?

You just said a few lines down that you sometimes fap 4-5 times a day….. to what? Fast cars?

If your fapping to the female figure, whether it be a picture on a piece of paper, pixels on a screen, VR or a silicone rendering, does it f~~~ing matter? As long as your not pussy begging for a modern females precious vagina, who cares?

I just dont understand this logic.

I would highly encourage you to listen to the opening commentary of the video below.

Now with that said….

Guys who buy these dolls to comb their hair while chatting about their day, holding fake weddings with their dolls and telling them that they love them… thats just weird. I cant imagine going blue pill on a piece of plastic.

I’d f~~~ the hell out of one, then toss it in the closet like a used sock until next time. Its a tool, like anything else, IMO.

[DocParticipant]

Nicely put NomadicExpat.

It IS AN EVENT HORIZON FOR SURE.

Interesting video too. Male shaming Gynocentricm.

My ex tried to shame me within the last 24 hours.
I’ll go into detail another time but I just walked away.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[ghostParticipant]

NomadicExpat wrote:

You just said a few lines down that you sometimes fap 4-5 times a day….. to what? Fast cars?

I see what you’re saying. I just find the concept of the doll a bit too much for me. I actually do not need any photos or videos. I can imagine situations and get my release. I have trained myself to do this so the act of sex is unnecessary in my mind. The doll is just something “fake” to me so I will never use one.

I should not be so judgmental about men using dolls though. To each their own I guess.

[DocParticipant]

You have clarified right there what I have attempted and failed to do – no need for anything.

But having said that – if the robots do bring about an Event Horizon I am bought.
I ain’t into dolls and can’t see me ever using a robot unless it is indistinguishable in EVERY way to a real woman. With the exception of an OFF button.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[Author]

Posts