Seems Like A Fair Deal To Me

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

I live alone in an apartment. I don’t like doing chores, but I don’t like living in a messy environment either. So I clean up the place on my day off from work. It takes me about 2 hours to clean the whole place (scrubbing, sweeping, mopping). I’m not a messy person, so the apartment stays tidy all week. I do the laundry, take the trash out, cook my own meals, and I do my own grocery shopping.

If I was living in the 1950s, my wife would have the understanding that she would do these tasks while I spend the day working. I figure it would only take about 4 hours to run errands and do a few chores in the apartment. That leaves several free hours of the day for her to watch soap operas & read romance books. Compare four hours of chores, a back rub, and a handjob at the end of the day to an 8 hour work shift. I’ll pay all the bills. I’ll pay for food & occasional shopping sprees at the mall. In exchange for that, I want a clean apartment/house, cooked meals, and sexual gratification. This seems like a fair deal to me, and there used to be women in the USA (a long time ago) who would accept this deal. But the rabid feminists think housewives are slaves that should be liberated. They hate the traditional marriage roles for women (but not for men) and they want everyone else to hate them too. I think they are winning the war against traditional marriage.

I notice that women in third world countries aren’t protesting about the “oppression” of their marriage roles. Their daily chores are MUCH MORE difficult to endure than what the average American or Western woman goes through. Some of them live in tents or wood shacks. They hand wash a basket of clothes in a river, cook three meals a day with a wood stove or an open fire pit, wash dishes, sweep the floor, change cloth diapers, walk to the marketplace to buy goods, and sleep on a mat. These women have very difficult lives and very little money–but they don’t have feminists rallies and demand the public to give them a break, increase their social status, or give them welfare. They don’t have modern appliances to make their household tasks easier. They just humbly do what they’re expected to do. And they still have sex with their husbands even if these men only make 50 cents an hour at work. I think women living in extreme poverty would embrace the roles that independent, entitled women don’t want to play.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[FuckMeSpectator 215]

FunInTheSun wrote:

I think women living in extreme poverty would embrace the roles that independent, entitled women don’t want to play.

You said it. My last profile I had online stated “If your in debt a little, don’t own much, or are flat broke then perfect” because I figure one that is broke will appreciate me more, what a f~~~ed up society we have become…EVERYTHING seems like it is an exchange for money. There is A LOT to love here at MGTOW, ad free is THE way to go…

You think Chernobyl was bad? Wait until the ink drys on that marriage contract you just signed...we know, you just wanted sex and fun...you could have gotten that for $100.00 a couple times a month instead of DESTROYING your life!!!

[megatoad69Participant 449]

Pre feminism women had a sweet deal.
And like women, they went and f~~~ed it up.

You can't reason with unreasonable, there; women, figured out, there is nothing to reason.

[HitmanParticipant]

They had more than a good deal. .they did f~~~ it up. .society now. .poisoned by feminist ideology. .let them struggle. .they ruined their own good thing. .DUMB !

[Author]

Posts