Home › Forums › Relations~~~s › Seeking Arrangement
This topic contains 10 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by
Y_ 3 years ago.
- AuthorPosts
I do these things so that you don’t have to.
About a month ago, someone posted about this site “Seeking Arrangement” where women who want someone to pay for their s~~~ find schlubs who think that paying for a woman’s s~~~ gives him authority over her vagina.
I’ll state at the outset that I am fully aware that the power of pussy is the power to manipulate men with the promise of sex, appreciation and loyalty in order to extract protection and provision from them. Now normally I would say that I respect an honest whore who hands you a menu with prices up front and, on the face of it, sites like Seeking Arrangement do exactly this. But of course women are duplicitous and even if they weren’t, Briffault’s Law still applies.
I signed up for an account on Seeking Arrangement in order to look into what kind of things women are willing to do and say at this point as a baseline for how things will be in four years. Here are my results.
My profile was very simple. I used a false name, stated my income as about $250,000 a year and my net worth at $750,000 and posted a single image of myself in a suit at a local lounge that was taken about a year ago which had never been posted anywhere else online. For my description I wrote a single sentence that I am interested in quality and have time, effort and energy to spare. For my desired match I wrote a single sentence saying I was looking for an independent minded woman looking for a man who knows how to show her a good time.
“Independent Minded”. Lol.
Anyway, after creating the account, I let it sit… maybe did three searches and viewed some profiles but didn’t initiate communication with anyone. Here are my results.
To date I have been viewed by 207 women, 90 of whom marked me as “favorite”. I was messaged by about 45 individuals and responded to 7 of them. About half the women who messaged me were either out of the country, undesirable or obviously bots. Many of the others came on like prostitutes (“Hey baby, what are you doing tonight?”) but a few seemed like actual women. Of the seven I responded to, five became conversations.
1) This individual turned out to be a M->F transsexual. “She” sent me private images which did not look at all like the profile image. I told “her” I was not interested.
2) This individual messaged me several times and asked to meet for coffee but then asked me to give her an “allowance” in order to meet. I told her it’s considered good business negotiation strategy to offer something of value before asking for payment.
3) This individual asked to meet me for drinks then messaged me photos and reports from AVN with her posing with porn stars and suggesting that she might become a camwhore. I told her she was free to do whatever she wanted with her vagina but that if she wants to be someone’s “sugar baby” she needs to be telling him what she’s going to do with HIM, not what she’s doing with other people.
4) This individual asked to meet for drinks, saying she’s tired of dating losers and signed up to the site to meet “men who have their s~~~ together”. When I asked her “How would you feel about dating a man who actually made your life BETTER?”, she stopped messaging me.
5) This individual suggested meeting, then revealed that she lived in another country but was moving to the States soon and would text me when she got here. Riiiight.
The take-away I got from this experience: not only do women desperately need strong, financially stable men and hate us because of it, but they’re so resistant to the idea of it that they’ve deliberately forgotten how to appeal to us. I was impressed by how pathetic the efforts were.
Women are wrecked. We’ll see how much better they get at trying to catch a man after four years of Trump-enforced responsibility. I’ll be happy to share my results with you all again at that point.
Great experiment.
The best part is the sugar babies will lead to legal prostitution in the USA. That’s all they are. One it is acceptable en mass the price will drop like a stone as every female will be looking to make a little extra.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
Precisely. Male-female relationships have ALWAYS been transactional. Exclusive access to sex and reproduction in exchange for protection and provision.
Somewhere (I’m no historian) we went through some romantic period where relationships were supposed to be about love and desire.
Now we’re getting to the point where we’re honest about it again… and it’s about to be disintermediated. The fog of war is lifting and we’re getting to the point where it’s gonna be literally “Five dollah, make you holla!”
Women are about to find out just exactly how valuable pussy ACTUALLY is. Hope they can compete in the sexually liberated world THEY created.

Anonymous18Women only admit to their true intentions after you are no longer seen as a potential victim/partner type. As default their imagery is for nice girl-next-door who spreads so long the man in question can provide and doing so refer to transaction as intimacy or love. Their next state is the more conspicuous exchange of sex with money/things. Pussy for sale, 10% discount.
The quality of a woman is determined in 10 seconds after you get her to want sex and then deny her. Her potential others are mentioned in those crucial 10 seconds.
Too f~~~ing expensive….I’ve never paid S~~~ for pussy and being a musician and about an 8 or so, I plowed a lot of it. My mid 30’s sucked cause I gained about 40lbs over the decade, was miserable and I satisfied with my life..then I got my s~~~ together, lost the weight and women attacked me..I freaked out and got married when I was obviously NOT in my right mind….anyway, Pussy in the USA is at least 5X what it should cost for a young, pretty, slim girl. The escort prices I’ve seen seem insane to me…
Be professional be polite but always have a plan to kill everyone you meet.
The title of site fully implies a quid pro quo relationship. Still the snowflakes want it for free, as if every guy they meet is a welfare state. Either way they have nothing to offer, or worse think their golden vag is worth the world.
If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.
As usual Son of R’lyeh has cut through the BS to the heart of the matter. And I think he is right. As women divest themselves of the traditional “romantic love” paradigm in favor of their “liberated fantasy” they will indeed be left with nothing to offer but sex–in an honest trade for resources. The smoke and mirrors will be gone. When that happens the forces of the market will take over. Supply and demand will fix a “pussy price” if I may be so bold as to coin the phrase.
And then reality will take control as most will find that demand for their used up high mileage saggy labia is LOW and the competition for hot poon-tang will be high! Ah the forces of the market can be cruel. And it will be interesting to see how the knowledge of their own depreciating value affects their behavior. Should be amusing.
Somewhere (I’m no historian) we went through some romantic period where relationships were supposed to be about love and desire.
I’m beginning to think romance and ‘love and desire’ don’t fit together. I do believe that love and desire can exist between a man in woman, if there the right social constraints are in place to keep the two people together and dependent on each other for mutual benefit. It takes time and commitment for their to be actual love. Romance seems more like a shortcut that doesn’t work. It’s like a ‘fake it till you make it’ approach.
What I find funny about a lot of these women on dating sites is that they want to be romanced right off the bat. They don’t really care about the real thing, they just want something quick and easy. As well, they want to be ‘loved’ for something different then looks, even though all you know of them is looks.
Ok. Then do it.
Thank you Pete, you get it… and succinctly put, as well.
Narwhal; let me correct my language… rather than “love” I should have said “feelings”.
When I use the word love in my own life, I mean it in terms of the day to day actions one person takes that protects and provides for another. Man’s love, as it were. Curating, shepherding, husbanding, stewarding… these are the ways men love.
For women, I shouldn’t say love… when I said that “relationships were supposed to be about love and desire”, I should have said “relationships were supposed to be about desire and emotions rather than practical concerns and positive actions”.
I’m sure you knew what I meant.
Wrapping up this little experiment… after having one last girl suggest I should pay her for the privilege of meeting her for coffee, I updated my profile.
Not like it matters, but at least I enjoyed writing it.

The take-away I got from this experience: not only do women desperately need strong, financially stable men and hate us because of it, but they’re so resistant to the idea of it that they’ve deliberately forgotten how to appeal to us. I was impressed by how pathetic the efforts were.
You Sir, are a Steely-Eyed Missile Man.
MGTOW medal of bravery with cluster.- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
