Scietifically Proven :Men Are Smarter

[Y_Participant 4591]

Presented here is conclusive information from two good papers on sex differences in IQ that end up having the same conclusion. Additionally, data from Mensa Canada is given that agrees with both those papers on that point. Not that this will not be found in the MSM.

WISC-R Test for 6-16 year olds

The paper is from Jensen, A. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (1983). It finds that females have a 101.41 mean IQ with a 13.55 standard deviation versus males that have a 103.08 mean IQ with a 14.54 standard deviation for 6-16 year olds. ‘Not much difference’ say the feminists.

When the summary data is used to generate a graph, and a different picture emerges:
http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/Images/Sex%20differences%20on%20the%20WISC.jpg

Note that due to the seemingly unimportant slightly higher male average IQ, the extra male variability does not mean that there are many more mentally deficient males.

Instead, the areas under the curve show that at the high extreme, such as the Mensa or gifted cut-off IQ of 130 (indicated by the red arrow) and above, there are significantly more males than females who qualify.

In other words, the reason there are less men in the middle of the group is because there are more men in the smarter areas on the right of the chart.

Let’s be adult about this.

Raven Progressive Matrices for Adults

The situation is even more pronounced if one looks at the other paper: Lynn, R., & Irwing, P. (2004). In this paper, which looked at adult IQs, a five point higher IQ was found for males over females and the standard deviations were found to be equal. Graphed, it looks like this:

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/Images/Sex%20differences%20Adult%20Raven%20Mensa%20Cutoff.jpg

Looking at the graph produced from this meta-analysis, beyond the 130 cut-off, the ratio of the areas under the curve for males and females is about 2:1.

In other words, men are not only smarter after puberty kicks in, but the gap widens the further up the IQ scale you go. The higher someone’s IQ, the more likely they are to be a man. Although there is relative parity between men and women around the average IQ of 100, at IQs of 130-150 the male to female ratio is already 2.5:1.

The main differences between the two papers are that the WISC has verbal (educationally dependent) and performance (non-educationally dependent) components and it was given to children. The Raven is a pure performance type test, and the paper only looked at scores from adult samples.

The second paper is the more trustworthy one for two reasons. First, it is based on 57 samples instead of one large one. Second, it includes a statement that might actually explain the disagreement between the two papers: “Results showed that there is no difference among children aged 6–14 years, but that males obtain higher means from the age of 15 through to old age.”

Conclusion

Male and female mean IQs are about equal below the age of 15 but males have a higher mean IQ from age 15 on. The effect of sex differences in IQ is largest at the high extreme of intelligence.

Since many of the more prestigious roles in society are associated with high IQ, the lack of female representation in these roles may be partially due to fewer females being (mentally) competitive at these highest levels.

I rest my case. MEN ROCK!!!
Females to be replaced by sex-bots.

http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/sexdifferences.aspx

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Excellent analysis Yumbo. But there is another explanation for the results. Men are largely driven by left brain; logic reasoning etc. and Women are right brain–fluffy nonsense. and I think I.Q is largely geared to measure left side strengths. At least thats what I recall from the Mensa exams I took years ago.

[Psl47Participant 678]

Ive kind of knew that all my life , lol 😉

.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Well done, Yumbo. I suspect you’re closer to the 130 range than I am.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Unfortunately high IQ co insides with issues. Like autism.

I’d trade 50 IQ points to be able to fit in socially.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Anonymous 54]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

Unfortunately high IQ co insides with issues. Like autism.

I’d trade 50 IQ points to be able to fit in socially.

Deal!

[Y_Participant 4591]

Hi Pete / everyone

My MGTOW brothers aside, I know from working with quite a few of them that high IQ people are usually so wrapped up in their own world they do not care much to learn how to interact with others. It appears that many scholars are retarded 🙂 but they are just indifferent to the real world. Trust me on this.

As Pete said the left and right brain theories were traditionally thought to control male and female responses. To a degree this is now still true. It didn’t explain why most great writers, artistic performers and painters etc. were men.

What they now found was – the male brain uses front to back action to access areas in both lobes to reach a decision or think. There is a MRI that shows the entire front-to-rear action. Nothing short of beautiful.

The female uses brain power to access information in a left-tight lobe transfer – this totally is not the way men do it. (I think it is the left lobe blaming the right and vice versa).

You wont see this report in the MSM very much.

The male brain is highly specialized, using specific parts of one hemisphere or the other to accomplish specific tasks. The female brain is more diffused and utilizes significant portions of both hemispheres for a variety of tasks.

Men are able to focus on narrow issues and block out unrelated information and distractions. Women naturally see everyday things from a broader, “big-picture” vantage point.

Men can narrowly focus their brains on specific tasks or activities for long periods of time without tiring. Women are better equipped to divide their attention among multiple activities or tasks.

Men are able to separate information, stimulus, emotions, relationships, etc. into separate compartments in their brains, while women tend to link everything together. (I call this confusion)

Men see individual issues with parts of their brain, while women look at the holistic or multiple issues with both hemispheres. (I call this more confusion)

Men have as much as 20 times more testosterone in their systems than do women. This makes men typically more aggressive in their approach to solving problems and more narrowly focused

In men, the dominant perceptual sense is vision, which is typically not the case with women. All of a woman’s senses are, in some respects, more finely tuned than those of a man.

Pornographers incorporate male/female differences into the design and marketing of their wares. Just because something might not appeal to a man doesn’t mean that a woman won’t be attracted to it and vice versa.

Hope that was interesting

ttps://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/02/men-women-brains-wired-differently

[Author]

Posts