Science says feminist activist women are masculinized.

[RoyDalParticipant]

(Well, I must say I am not too surprised that they turn out to be a bunch of bull dykes. –RD)

Madison, G., Aasa, U., Wallert, J., & Woodley, M.(2014). Feminist activist women are masculinized in terms of digit-ratio and dominance: A possible explanation for the feminist paradox. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1011.

Abstract:
The feminist movement purports to improve conditions for women, and yet only a minority of women in modern societies self-identify as feminists. This is known as the feminist paradox. It has been suggested that feminists exhibit both physiological and psychological characteristics associated with heightened masculinization, which may predispose women for heightened competitiveness, sex-atypical behaviors, and belief in the interchangeability of sex roles. If feminist activists, i.e. those that manufacture the public image of feminism, are indeed masculinized relative to women in general, this might explain why the views and preferences of these two groups are at variance with each other. We measured the 2D:4D digit ratios (collected from both hands) and a personality trait known as dominance (measured with the Directiveness scale) in a sample of women attending a feminist conference. The sample exhibited significantly more masculine 2D:4D and higher dominance ratings than comparison samples representative of women in general, and these variables were furthermore positively correlated for both hands. The feminist paradox might thus to some extent be explained by biological differences between women in general and the activist women who formulate the feminist agenda.

journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01011/pdf

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

That explains a lot.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

There still c~~~s though right?

😁

[peterfaParticipant 833]

It does offer slight evidence for my philosophy that people typically believe with what they feel they relate, but not because of the validity of that. Women who are psychopaths will be attracted to feminism because it speaks to them. They see men as objects for usage because they see people for that. They are also expert manipulators. That would be the radical feminists who believe men are trash and should be always reminded of such.

There are other types of feminists though. As I see it, each feminist sees something that appeals to her. Some women feel comfortable blaming male sexuality for not being interested in them (fat-shaming, etc), and the others who find it tickles their narcissism, which are the ones who constantly say men objectify them, are creepy and ogle them.

There’s this recognized problem that so many women have, “I feel, therefore it’s true.” Well, that’s subjective and not objective. It’s self-serving and lazy.

[Author]

Posts