Saddam Hussein

Topic by Jan Sobieski

Jan Sobieski

Home Forums Political Corner Saddam Hussein

This topic contains 10 replies, has 11 voices, and was last updated by Sky-O  Sky-O 3 years, 1 month ago.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #372616
    +5
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791
    #372622
    +5
    Blade
    blade
    Participant

    All those weapons of mass destruction and the media bulls~~~ propaganda played well . Even though looked at as a brutal ruler he kept things under control and the majority of the people were happy with a functional society. Now the oilfields have been conquered and the elites have filled there pockets from the military machine and the rebuild companies like halliburton the people are much worse of . Now the aftermath and destabilization will keep those pockets topped up

    THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

    #372646
    +2
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    I agree. Sorry to say it, but it’s true. Democracy is not a viable option in the islamic world.

    I just listened to this author being interviewed on the radio. He says much the same in his latest book. (Ordered this day, delivery date to be determined)
    The Muhammad Code: How a Desert Prophet Brought You ISIS, al Qaeda, and Boko Haram
    by Howard Bloom

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #372652
    +3
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35200

    As like many things in life, you may not “like” what you have, but there’s no guarantee that the replacement will be any better, and it can always end up being far worse.

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #372692
    +1
    Jeremiah Johnson
    Jeremiah Johnson
    Participant
    2219

    Everyone said I was f~~~ing nuts when I said this, my reply was always the same…The seals could have killed this man back in the early 90’s, we didn’t, and the reason was very simple…AT LEAST WE KNEW WHAT WE ARE GETTING WITH HIM, Same as Muammar Gaddafi….At the very least you keep stability in the region, and the can keep things running in their own country…Then they would look at me like I was speaking f~~~ing chinese or something…ugh, it is so unexplainable difficult trying to explain logic and intelligence to a horde of 60 – 70 average IQ people….By the time they get it, it is a little too late…

    Men are at a time when panning for gold in a urinal has a higher probability of success than finding a faithful and loving woman, it is time to go your own way.....

    #372753
    +2

    Anonymous
    43

    Sodom Insane kept the lid on a dangerous pot. So did Gadaffi, an a lot of other nasty f~~~ers.

    #372776
    +1
    Magus
    Magus
    Participant
    424

    I think most everybody knew this and went along with it because it let us play war. It also benefits the military industrial complex. And when we can no longer print up money because the dollar becomes worthless then we stop agitating those countries. Those countries are too far away to harm us and so they go back to rebuilding. Much like Vietnam. And in a generation or two they join the rest of the world and forgive us. Long after the short term profits have been made. And those that made the profits will have died of old age.

    However it does not help our country as a whole. It is short term profits at the expense of our countries future.

    #372882
    +1

    Anonymous
    24

    U.S. is nothing more than an Israeli puppet state at this point. We have been systematically destroying all those around Israel that Israel wants destroyed for quite some time now. Libya was a joke, Syria is a terrible joke, 350k dead now, and we are fueling this s~~~, always have been, always will be.

    #373254

    Anonymous
    22

    The Great Satan… you know what country I’m referring to? Well, here’s a hint. It’s not Iraq or Saddam Hussein.

    #373293
    Jim01
    Jim01
    Participant
    6678

    I am not paid £100ks a year or had years of fancy training and I could have told them that in two seconds

    #373931
    Sky-O
    Sky-O
    Participant
    18933

    Saddam never had WMDs (after 1992)

    FYI to the world.

    The reason he delayed inspectors and acted like he might still have WMDs was simple.

    And it was not because he viewed the US as a threat. He didn’t think Bush would ever start a cluster f~~~ of a war over a claim that he had WMDs.

    He acted like he still had them for one reason and one reason only:

    IRAN

    He viewed Iran as a long term military threat and with his own economy and military depleted following the ten plus year long war with Iran (’78-88) and the effect not being able to sell oil outside of the post Gulf War ’91 restrictions –

    He had to make Iran think he still had WMDs to prevent them from engaging in any future military action against Iraq.

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.